Cited by 51Face Recognition and PerceptionDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Recognition of facial expressions of different emotional intensities in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Open access
Kessels, Roy P. C., Gerritsen, Lotte, Montagne, Barbara, Ackl, Nibal, Diehl, Janine, Danek, Adrian·2007·Behavioural Neurology

Abstract

Behavioural problems are a key feature of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Also, FTLD patients show impairments in emotion processing. Specifically, the perception of negative emotional facial expressions is affected. Generally, however, negative emotional expressions are regarded as more difficult to recognize than positive ones, which thus may have been a confounding factor in previous studies. Also, ceiling effects are often present on emotion recognition tasks using full‐blown emotional facial expressions. In the present study with FTLD patients, we examined the perception of sadness, anger, fear, happiness, surprise and disgust at different emotional intensities on morphed facial expressions to take task difficulty into account. Results showed that our FTLD patients were specifically impaired at the recognition of the emotion anger. Also, the patients performed worse than the controls on recognition of surprise, but performed at control levels on disgust, happiness, sadness and fear. These findings corroborate and extend previous results showing deficits in emotion perception in FTLD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2007/868431

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kessels, R. P. C., Gerritsen, L., Montagne, B., Ackl, N., Diehl, J., & Danek, A.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie (DE)
Corresponding author
Kessels, Roy P. C.
Venue
Behavioural Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
31-36
ISSN
  • 0953-4180 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8584
OpenAlex
W2104701606
Cited by
51
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (490-22-203)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
frontotemporal lobar degeneration, facial expression recognition, emotion recognition, emotional intensity, anger recognition, behavioral problems
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Dementia, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nonverbal Communication, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reference Values, Social Perception, Matched-Pair Analysis, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review