The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluating Pavement Cracks with Bidimensional Empirical Mode Decomposition
Open accessAbstract
Crack evaluation is essential for effective classification of pavement cracks. Digital images of pavement cracks have been analyzed using techniques such as fuzzy set theory and neural networks. Bidimensional empirical mode decomposition (BEMD), a new image analysis method recently developed, can potentially be used for pavement crack evaluation. BEMD is an extension of the empirical mode decomposition (EMD), which can decompose nonlinear and nonstationary signals into basis functions called intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). IMFs are monocomponent functions that have well-defined instantaneous frequencies. EMD is a sifting process that is nonparametric and data driven; it does not depend on an a priori basis set. It is able to remove noise from signals without complicated convolution processes. BEMD decomposes an image into two-dimensional IMFs. The present paper explores pavement crack detection using BEMD together with the Sobel edge detector. A number of images are filtered with BEMD to remove noise, and the residual image analyzed with the Sobel edge detector for crack detection. The results are compared with results from the Canny edge detector, which uses a Gaussian filter for image smoothing before performing edge detection. The objective is to qualitatively explore how well BEMD is able to smooth an image for more effective edge detection with the Sobel method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Automatic Pixel‐Level Crack Detection and Measurement Using Fully Convolutional Network
Yang, X., Li, H., Yu, Y., Luo, X., Huang, T., & Yang, X. (2018) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12412 · Cited by 852
Automatic Road Crack Detection and Characterization
Oliveira, H., & Correia, P. L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2012.2208630 · Cited by 537
Kheradmandi, N., & Mehranfar, V. (2022) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126162 · Cited by 426
Nhat-Duc, H., Nguyen, Q.-L., & Tran, V.-D. (2018) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.008 · Cited by 369
Zakeri, H., Nejad, F. M., & Fahimifar, A. (2017) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-016-9194-z · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Ayenu-Prah, A., & Attoh-Okine, N.
- Venue
- EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing
- Published
- 2008-03-30
- Volume
- 2008
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1110-8657 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-6180
- OpenAlex
- W2008935780
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating Pavement Cracks with Bidimensional Empirical Mode Decomposition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2008/861701
- The paper
- Ayenu-Prah, A., & Attoh-Okine, N. (2008). Evaluating Pavement Cracks with Bidimensional Empirical Mode Decomposition. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/861701
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.