Cited by 26EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeural dynamics and brain functionFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Changes in EEG power spectral density and cortical connectivity in healthy and tetraplegic patients during a motor imagery task.

Open access
Cona, Filippo, Zavaglia, Melissa, Astolfi, Laura, Babiloni, Fabio, Ursino, Mauro·2009·Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience

Abstract

Knowledge of brain connectivity is an important aspect of modern neuroscience, to understand how the brain realizes its functions. In this work, neural mass models including four groups of excitatory and inhibitory neurons are used to estimate the connectivity among three cortical regions of interests (ROIs) during a foot‐movement task. Real data were obtained via high‐resolution scalp EEGs on two populations: healthy volunteers and tetraplegic patients. A 3‐shell Boundary Element Model of the head was used to estimate the cortical current density and to derive cortical EEGs in the three ROIs. The model assumes that each ROI can generate an intrinsic rhythm in the beta range, and receives rhythms in the alpha and gamma ranges from other two regions. Connectivity strengths among the ROIs were estimated by means of an original genetic algorithm that tries to minimize several cost functions of the difference between real and model power spectral densities. Results show that the stronger connections are those from the cingulate cortex to the primary and supplementary motor areas, thus emphasizing the pivotal role played by the CMA_L during the task. Tetraplegic patients exhibit higher connectivity strength on average, with significant statistical differences in some connections. The results are commented and virtues and limitations of the proposed method discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2009/279515

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Feature matrix input can be extracted by wavelet, entropy, STFT, power spectral density, and so on.

    “Another form of input is the feature matrix that could be extracted by wavelet, entropy, STFT, power spectral density, and so on (Subasi, 2007; Filippo et al., 2009; Seitsonen et al., 2010; Lu et al., 2017; Lashgari et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00112-5 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.mri.2004.10.006 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/PL00007990 · DOI
  4. Kamiński M., 1995, Investigation of coherence structure and EEG activity propagation during sleep, Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 55, 213, 10.55782/ane-1995-1078 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0013-4694(96)95721-5 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s004220000235 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0165-0270(03)00052-9 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Freeman W. J., 1978, Models of the dynamics of neural populations, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 34, 9
  9. 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60995-4 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/BF00199471 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.01985.x · DOI
  12. 10.1007/BF00317988 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s004220000160 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.015 · DOI
  15. 10.1162/neco.2007.19.2.478 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s00422-006-0122-4 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.04.022 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/TBME.2007.897814 · DOI
  19. Zavaglia M., 2008, A model of rhythm generation and functional connectivity during a simple motor task: preliminary validation with real scalp EEG data, International Journal of Bioelectromagnetism, 10, 68
  20. Wendling F., 2005, Interictal to ictal transition in human temporal lobe epilepsy: insights from a computational model of intracerebral EEG, Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 22, 343
  21. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.036 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.conb.2003.10.008 · DOI
  25. Holland J., 1975, Adaptation in Natural and Articial Systems
  26. 10.1007/s12038-007-0012-5 · DOI
  27. Liley D. T. J., 2005, Understanding the transition to seizure by modeling the epileptiform activity of general anesthetic agents, Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 22, 300
  28. 10.1093/cercor/bhh111 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301069.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.012 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1093/cercor/6.3.342 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/S0926-6410(96)00031-6 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.019 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00661-7 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90011-5 · DOI
  36. Gutfreund Y., 1995, Subthreshold oscillations and resonant frequency in guinea-pig cortical neurons: physiology and modelling, The Journal of Physiology, 483, 621, 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020611 · DOI
  37. 10.1073/pnas.88.3.897 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S0166-2236(96)10023-0 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1109/TNSRE.2008.2006196 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.09.023 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00269.x · DOI
  43. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00300.x · DOI
  44. 10.1006/nimg.2002.1090 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cona, F., Zavaglia, M., Astolfi, L., Babiloni, F., & Ursino, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
Corresponding author
Ursino, Mauro
Venue
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01
Volume
2009
Issue
1
Pages
279515-279515
ISSN
  • 1687-5265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-5273
OpenAlex
W1969140390
Cited by
26
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Cooperation in Science and Technology (BM0601)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
cortical connectivity, EEG power spectral density, tetraplegia, motor imagery, neural mass model, genetic algorithm, boundary element model, cingulate motor area, primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area, beta oscillations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review