The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mutagenesis as a Tool in Plant Genetics, Functional Genomics, and Breeding
Open accessAbstract
Plant mutagenesis is rapidly coming of age in the aftermath of recent developments in high-resolution molecular and biochemical techniques. By combining the high variation of mutagenised populations with novel screening methods, traits that are almost impossible to identify by conventional breeding are now being developed and characterised at the molecular level. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the various techniques and workflows available to researchers today in the field of molecular breeding, and how these tools complement the ones already used in traditional breeding. Both genetic (Targeting Induced Local Lesions in Genomes; TILLING) and phenotypic screens are evaluated. Finally, different ways of bridging the gap between genotype and phenotype are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Direct detection of DNA methylation during single-molecule, real-time sequencing
Flusberg, B. A., Webster, D. R., Lee, J. H., Travers, K. J., Olivares, E. C., Clark, T. A., Korlach, J., & Turner, S. W. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1459 · Cited by 1,460
UTILLdb, a Pisum sativum in silicoforward and reverse genetics tool
Dalmais, M., Schmidt, J., Le Signor, C., Moussy, F., Burstin, J., Savois, V., Aubert, G., Brunaud, V., de Oliveira, Y., Guichard, C., et al. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-r43 · Cited by 187
Cited by
Gene Editing and Crop Improvement Using CRISPR-Cas9 System
Arora, L., & Narula, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01932 · Cited by 367
Enhancing genetic gain in the era of molecular breeding
Xu, Y., Li, P., Zou, C., Lu, Y., Xie, C., Zhang, X., Prasanna, B. M., & Olsen, M. S. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erx135 · Cited by 336
Potential of Industrial Hemp for Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals
Placido, D. F., & Lee, C. C. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11050595 · Cited by 96
Tools and targets: the dual role of plant viruses in CRISPR–Cas genome editing
Uranga, M., & Daròs, J. (2023) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.1002/tpg2.20220 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Sikora, P., Chawade, A., Larsson, M., Olsson, J., & Olsson, O.
- Venue
- International Journal of Plant Genomics
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2011-01-22
- Volume
- 2011
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 1687-5370 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-5389
- OpenAlex
- W2108786468
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutagenesis as a Tool in Plant Genetics, Functional Genomics, and Breeding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2011/314829
- The paper
- Sikora, P., Chawade, A., Larsson, M., Olsson, J., & Olsson, O. (2011). Mutagenesis as a Tool in Plant Genetics, Functional Genomics, and Breeding. International Journal of Plant Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/314829
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
