Cited by 74Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Sensitivity to Pain Traumatization: A Higher‐Order Factor Underlying Pain‐Related Anxiety, Pain Catastrophizing and Anxiety Sensitivity among Patients Scheduled for Major Surgery

Open access
Kleiman, Valery, Clarke, Hance, Katz, Joel·2011·Pain Research and Management

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present article addresses two related developments in the psychology of pain, and integrates them into a coherent framework to better understand the relationship between pain and trauma. The first is an emerging conceptualization regarding the nature of the hierarchical organization of major pain‐related anxiety constructs. The second is the theoretical rationale and empirical evidence linking pain and symptoms of post‐traumatic stress disorder. OBJECTIVES: To explore the underlying hierarchical factor structure of commonly used pain‐related anxiety measures including the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS‐20), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI); and to relate this structure to post‐traumatic stress disorder in patients scheduled for major surgery. METHODS: Measures were completed by 444 patients scheduled to undergo major surgery. Exploratory factor analysis and subsequent higher‐order analysis using the Schmid‐Leiman transformation were conducted to investigate the underlying factor structure of the ASI, the PCS and the PASS‐20. RESULTS: Twenty items from the ASI, the PASS‐20 and the PCS loaded exclusively on one higher‐order factor. The authors suggest the term ‘sensitivity to pain traumatization’ (SPT) for the underlying construct based in part on the strong, significant positive correlation between SPT scores and scores on the Post‐traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist – Civilian Version. Finally, the total SPT score was significantly higher for patients with a history of pain than for those without a history of pain, both before surgery and one year after surgery. SPT describes the propensity to develop anxiety‐related somatic, cognitive, emotional and behavioural responses to pain that resemble features of a traumatic stress reaction. Together, the results of the present study provide preliminary evidence for the construct validity of SPT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2011/932590

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Posttraumatic stress symptoms predict the development of chronic postsurgical pain.

    “Negative cognitive–affective states including perioperative depression,42,43 anxiety,25,32,35,43,44 pain catastrophizing,18,44 and posttraumatic stress symptoms45 also predict the development of CPSP.”

    From Chronic postsurgical pain: From risk factor identification to multidisciplinary management at the Toronto General Hospital Transitional Pain Service (2019) · cites this paper as [45]

    The paper’s PCL-C measure assesses PTSD symptoms (PTSD Checklist – Civilian Version). In “Testing the construct validity of SPT” (page not provided), presurgery PCL-C scores did not differ significantly between patients with persistent pain and those without it at one year (P=0.15). The paper reports this distinction for sensitivity to pain traumatization (SPT), not for PTSD symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most patients are provided little more than pharmacotherapy for pain after surgery and are generally offered no intervention targeting the psychological vulnerability factors associated with a greater probability of pain chronicity, including pain catastrophizing, sensitivity to pain traumatization, anxiety and depressive symptoms.

    “Most patients are provided little more than pharmacotherapy for pain after surgery and are generally offered no intervention targeting the psychological vulnerability factors that are associated with a greater probability of pain chronicity, including pain catastrophizing,8 sensitivity to pain traumatization,9 anxiety and depressive symptoms.10”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Lilienfeld SO. Anxiety sensitivity is not distinct from trait anxiety. In: Rapee RM, ed. Current controversies in the anxiety disorders. New York: The Guilford Press, 1996:228-44.
  2. Asmundson GJG, Norton PJ, Norton GR. Beyond pain: The role of fear and avoidance in chronicity. Clin Psychol Rev 1999;19:97-119.
  3. Chen FF, West SG, Sousa KH. A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behav Res 2006;41:189-225.
  4. Westgard JO. Basic Method Validation. Berlin: Springer, 1999.
  5. Turk DC. A diathesis-stress model of chronic pain and disability following traumatic injury. Pain Res Manag 2002;7:9-19.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kleiman, V., Clarke, H., & Katz, J.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Katz, Joel
Venue
Pain Research and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
169-177
ISSN
  • 1203-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-1523
OpenAlex
W2294244675
Cited by
74
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain Research and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
pain-related anxiety, pain catastrophizing, anxiety sensitivity, post-traumatic stress disorder, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Anxiety Sensitivity Index, higher-order factor structure, major surgery, preoperative anxiety, construct validity, history of pain
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Pain, Postoperative, Postoperative Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Statistics as Topic, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Young Adult, Catastrophization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review