Cited by 8Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsUsability and User Interface DesignMental Health Research Topics

Experience-Sampling Methodology with a Mobile Device in Fibromyalgia

Open access
Diana, Castilla, Cristina, Botella, Azucena, García-Palacios, Luis, Farfallini, Ignacio, Miralles·2012·International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications

Abstract

This work describes the usability studies conducted in the development of an experience-sampling methodology (ESM) system running in a mobile device. The goal of the system is to improve the accuracy and ecology in gathering daily self-report data in individuals suffering a chronic pain condition, fibromyalgia. The usability studies showed that the developed software to conduct ESM with mobile devices (smartphones, cell phones) can be successfully used by individuals with fibromyalgia of different ages and with low level of expertise in the use of information and communication technologies. 100% of users completed the tasks successfully, although some have completely illiterate. Also there seems to be a clear difference in the way of interaction obtained in the two studies carried out.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2012/162673

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Clark J Tapworthy IPhone Design and User Experience 2011 San Francisco, Calif, USA O'Reilly Media

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diana, C., Cristina, B., Azucena, G.-P., Luis, F., & Ignacio, M.
Affiliations
  • Labpsitec, Universitat Jaume I, Avenida Sos Baynat s/n, 12071 Castellón de la Plana, Spain
  • Universitat Jaume I (ES)
Venue
International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications
Published
2012
Volume
2012
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 1687-6415 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-6423
OpenAlex
W2033519219
Cited by
8
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
ecological momentary assessment, mobile devices, fibromyalgia, chronic pain, usability, smartphones, illiterate users, ecological validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review