Cited by 7Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

The use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic workup and treatment of atrial fibrillation

Open access
Haemers, Peter, Claus, Piet, Willems, Rik·2012·Cardiology Research and Practice

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and imposes a huge clinical and economic burden. AF is correlated with an increased morbidity and mortality, mainly due to stroke and heart failure. Cardiovascular imaging modalities, including echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), play a central role in the workup and treatment of AF. One of the major advantages of CMR is the high contrast to noise ratio combined with good spatial and temporal resolution, without any radiation burden. This allows a detailed assessment of the structure and function of the left atrium (LA). Of particular interest is the ability to visualize the extent of LA wall injury. We provide a focused review of the value of CMR in identifying the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of AF, its role in stroke prevention and in the guidance of radiofrequency catheter ablation. CMR is a promising technique that could add valuable information for therapeutic decision making in specific subpopulations with AF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2012/658937

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delayed-enhancement MRI of the left atrium using gadolinium contrast, T1 mapping using cardiac MRI, and intracardiac echo may help to guide treatment decisions in AF, but require external validation in multicentre studies.

    “Delayed-enhancement MRI of the left atrium using gadolinium contrast, [345][346][347] T1 mapping using cardiac MRI, 347 and intracardiac echo 348 may help to guide treatment decisions in AF, but require external validation in multicentre studies.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haemers, P., Claus, P., & Willems, R.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Willems, Rik
Venue
Cardiology Research and Practice
Published
2012
Volume
2012
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 2090-0597 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-8016
OpenAlex
W2007485298
Cited by
7
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cardiology Research and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, left atrium, stroke prevention, radiofrequency catheter ablation, atrial fibrillation pathophysiology, heart failure, arrhythmia diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review