Cited by 156Mercury impact and mitigation studiesPlant Stress Responses and ToleranceEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phytotoxicity of Mercury in Plants: A Review

Open access
Azevedo, Raquel, Rodriguez, Eleazar·2012·Journal of Botany

Abstract

With the advent of the industrial revolution, heavy metal contamination has become an ever increasing concern. Thus, it is of major importance to understand the extent of the toxicity in plants and animals and the consequences from the ingestion of contaminated food. Hg is easily modified into several oxidation states, and it can be spread in many ecosystems. Due to the recurrence of Hg pollution and due to the lack of knowledge about the effects of this heavy metal in plants, the aim of the present text is to provide a comprehensive review of the literature regarding Hg phytotoxicity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2012/848614

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The permeability of cell membranes and the number of palisades may be reduced in the presence of mercury, resulting in the buildup of Fe and the loss of essential elements like Mg and K.

    “The permeability of cell membranes and the number of palisades may be reduced in the presence of Hg, resulting in the buildup of Fe and the loss of essential elements like Mgand K (Shiyab et al., 2009; Tangahu et al., 2011; Azevedo and Rodriguez, 2012).”

    From Plant hyperaccumulators: a state-of-the-art review on mechanism of heavy metal transport and sequestration (2025) · cites this paper as Azevedo and Rodriguez, 2012

    Section 5.1 (page not provided) says mercury can change cell-membrane permeability and that exposure can cause loss of potassium and magnesium and accumulation of iron. It does not say permeability is reduced or that these changes result from reduced permeability; it says the element losses help explain changes in membrane permeability. The passages do not support a reduction in the number of palisades. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mercury interaction with thiol groups in tissues rich in SH ligands, such as seed and embryo, results in the development of an S-Hg-S bridge, disrupting the group's stability and affecting seed germination and embryo development.

    “Hg interaction with thiol (SH) groups in tissues rich in SH ligands, such as seed and embryo, results in the development of an S-Hg-S bridge, which disrupts the group’s stability. Seed germination and embryo development are both affected by this binding.”

    From Plant hyperaccumulators: a state-of-the-art review on mechanism of heavy metal transport and sequestration (2025) · cites this paper as Azevedo and Rodriguez, 2012

    Section 5.1 (General Effects) says Hg forms an S-Hg-S bridge with SH groups, disrupting their stability, and that this can affect seed germination and embryo growth. The citing sentence presents those effects as certain, whereas the review describes them as possible. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mercury affects the antioxidant defense system by altering enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants and disrupting cells.

    “Hg also affects the antioxidant defense system by altering enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants and disrupting cells (Azevedo and Rodriguez, 2012), negatively affecting light and dark photosynthetic responses.”
  • Phytotoxic effects of high mercury levels on plants are possible.

    “Phytotoxic effects of high mercury levels on plants are possible (Azevedo and Rodriguez, 2012; Rocha et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 2005, Elements, 1, 193, 10.2113/gselements.1.4.193 · DOI
  2. 2007, International Journal of Physical Sciences, 2, 112
  3. 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.10.023 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.022 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.046 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.029 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.etap.2005.03.007 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s11356-009-0156-y · DOI
  9. 1988, Environmental Pollution, 50, 139, 10.1016/0269-7491(88)90189-3 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00137-3 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.02.009 · DOI
  12. 10.1104/pp.106.082743 · DOI
  13. 1981, Journal of Plant Nutrition, 3, 643, 10.1080/01904168109362867 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1007/s00204-008-0313-y · DOI
  16. 2000, Botanical Review, 66, 379, 10.1007/BF02868923 · DOI
  17. 10.1021/tx2001465 · DOI
  18. 2012, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 53, 94, 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.01.013 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00283-0 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/10408440600845619 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/ajim.20476 · DOI
  22. 10.1139/A08-001 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0896-8411(02)00115-4 · DOI
  24. 10.1104/pp.106.085068 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.envint.2010.03.011 · DOI
  26. 2000, Pharmacological Reviews, 52, 113, 10.1016/S0031-6997(24)01438-8 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.037 · DOI
  28. 1992, Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 22, 195, 10.1007/BF00213285 · DOI
  29. 10.1023/A:1010358708525 · DOI
  30. 2000, Metal-accumulating plants
  31. 1995, Environmental Science & Technology, 29, 1239, 10.1021/es00005a015 · DOI
  32. 1995, Environmental Science & Technology, 29, 1232, 10.1021/es00005a014 · DOI
  33. 1995, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 14, 61, 10.1002/etc.5620140108 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0041-008X(92)90015-K · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00367-8 · DOI
  36. 1962, Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 42, 280, 10.4141/cjps62-041 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/jxb/eri223 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.02.016 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Azevedo, R., & Rodriguez, E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 220 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Journal of Botany
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-20
Volume
2012
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 2090-0120 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-0139
OpenAlex
W2036040108
Cited by
156
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Botany (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BPD/75696/2011)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
mercury, phytotoxicity, heavy metal contamination, contaminated food

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review