The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms among Campylobacter
Open accessAbstract
Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli are recognized as the most common causative agents of bacterial gastroenteritis in the world. Humans most often become infected by ingesting contaminated food, especially undercooked chicken, but also other sources of bacteria have been described. Campylobacteriosis is normally a self-limiting disease. Antimicrobial treatment is needed only in patients with more severe disease and in those who are immunologically compromised. The most common antimicrobial agents used in the treatment of Campylobacter infections are macrolides, such as erythromycin, and fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin. Tetracyclines have been suggested as an alternative choice in the treatment of clinical campylobacteriosis but in practice are not often used. However, during the past few decades an increasing number of resistant Campylobacter isolates have developed resistance to fluoroquinolones and other antimicrobials such as macrolides, aminoglycosides, and beta-lactams. Trends in antimicrobial resistance have shown a clear correlation between use of antibiotics in the veterinary medicine and animal production and resistant isolates of Campylobacter in humans. In this review, the patterns of emerging resistance to the antimicrobial agents useful in treatment of the disease are presented and the mechanisms of resistance to these drugs in Campylobacter are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colowick, S. P., Joshi, M. D., Jagannathan, & KAPLAN, N. O. (1966) · Cited by 26,137
Manual of Clinical Microbiology.
(1980) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-93-6-939_2 · Cited by 14,411
Chopra, I., & Roberts, M. (2001) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.65.2.232-260.2001 · Cited by 4,517
The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences
Parkhill, J., Wren, B. W., Mungall, K., Ketley, J. M., Churcher, C., Basham, D., Chillingworth, T., Davies, R. M., Feltwell, T., Holroyd, S., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001088 · Cited by 1,976
Campylobacter jejuni Infections: Update on Emerging Issues and Trends
Acheson, D., & Allos, B. M. (2001) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/319760 · Cited by 1,216
Schlünzen, F., Zarivach, R., Harms, J., Bashan, A., Tocilj, A., Albrecht, R., Yonath, A., & Franceschi, F. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35101544 · Cited by 1,059
Experimental Campylobacter jejuni Infection in Humans
Black, R. E., Levine, M. M., Clements, M. L., Hughes, T. P., & Blaser, M. J. (1988) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/157.3.472 · Cited by 1,044
Mechanisms of Resistance to Quinolones
Jacoby, G. A. (2005) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/428052 · Cited by 924
Experimental Campylobacter Jejuni Infection in Humans
Black, R. E., Levine, M. M., Clements, M. L., Hughes, T. P., & Blaser, M. J. (1988) · doi:10.21236/ada265410 · Cited by 869
Molecular basis of bacterial resistance to chloramphenicol and florfenicol
Schwarz, S., Kehrenberg, C., Doublet, B., & Cloeckaert, A. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.04.001 · Cited by 800
Metadata
- Authors
- Wieczorek, K., & Osek, J.
- Venue
- BioMed Research International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 2013
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
- 2314-6133
- 2314-6141
- OpenAlex
- W1977184995
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 104
- FWCI
- 21.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms among Campylobacter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2013/340605
- The paper
- Wieczorek, K., & Osek, J. (2013). Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms among Campylobacter. BioMed Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/340605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.