The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of the Effect of Processing Variables on the Fabrication of Electrospun Nanofibers for Drug Delivery Applications
Open accessAbstract
Electrospinning is a fast emerging technique for producing ultrafine fibers by utilizing electrostatic repulsive forces. The technique has gathered much attention due to the emergence of nanotechnology that sparked worldwide research interest in nanomaterials for their preparation and application in biomedicine and drug delivery. Electrospinning is a simple, adaptable, cost‐effective, and versatile technique for producing nanofibers. For effective and efficient use of the technique,several processing parameters need to be optimized for fabricating polymeric nanofibers. The nanofiber morphology, size, porosity, surface area, and topography can be refined by varying these parameters. Such flexibility and diversity in nanofiber fabrication by electrospinning has broadened the horizons for widespread application of nanofibers in the areas of drug and gene delivery, wound dressing, and tissue engineering. Drug‐loaded electrospun nanofibers have been used in implants, transdermal systems, wound dressings, and as devices for aiding the prevention of postsurgical abdominal adhesions and infection. They show great promise for use in drug delivery provided that one can confidently control the processing variables during fabrication. This paper provides a concise incursion into the application of electrospun nanofibers in drug delivery and cites pertinent processing parameters that may influence the performance of the nanofibers when applied to drug delivery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scaffolding in tissue engineering: general approaches and tissue-specific considerations
Chan, B. P., & Leong, K. W. (2008) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0745-3 · Cited by 1,708
Vaz, C. M., van Tuijl, S., Bouten, C. V. C., & Baaijens, F. P. T. (2005) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2005.06.006 · Cited by 459
Cited by
Poly(lactic acid) nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering
Santoro, M., Shah, S. R., Walker, J. L., & Mikos, A. G. (2016) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.019 · Cited by 485
A review on fabrication of nanofibers via electrospinning and their applications
Islam, M. S., Ang, B. C., Andriyana, A., & Afifi, A. M. (2019) · SN Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-019-1288-4 · Cited by 386
Biomedical Applications of Electrospun Nanofibers: Drug and Nanoparticle Delivery
Bhattarai, R. S., Bachu, R. D., Boddu, S. H. S., & Bhaduri, S. (2018) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics11010005 · Cited by 322
Electrospun Fibrous Architectures for Drug Delivery, Tissue Engineering and Cancer Therapy
Ding, Y., Li, W., Zhang, F., Liu, Z., Zanjanizadeh Ezazi, N., Liu, D., & Santos, H. A. (2019) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201802852 · Cited by 312
Recent advances in carbon nanofibers and their applications – A review
Yadav, D., Amini, F., & Ehrmann, A. (2020) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109963 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Pillay, V., Dott, C., Choonara, Y. E., Tyagi, C., Tomar, L., Kumar, P., du Toit, L. C., & Ndesendo, V. M. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Nanomaterials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 2013
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1687-4110 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-4129
- OpenAlex
- W2009271116
- Cited by
- 689
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of the Effect of Processing Variables on the Fabrication of Electrospun Nanofibers for Drug Delivery Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2013/789289
- The paper
- Pillay, V., Dott, C., Choonara, Y. E., Tyagi, C., Tomar, L., Kumar, P., du Toit, L. C., & Ndesendo, V. M. K. (2013). A Review of the Effect of Processing Variables on the Fabrication of Electrospun Nanofibers for Drug Delivery Applications. Journal of Nanomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/789289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.