Cited by 16Spinal Cord Injury ResearchVeterinary Orthopedics and NeurologyNerve injury and regeneration

Tamoxifen Promotes Axonal Preservation and Gait Locomotion Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury in Cats

Open access
de la Torre Valdovinos, Braniff, Duenas Jimenez, Judith Marcela, Estrada, Ismael Jimenez, Banuelos Pineda, Jacinto, Franco Rodriguez, Nancy Elizabeth, Lopez Ruiz, Jose Roberto, Osuna Carrasco, Laura Paulina, Candanedo Arellano, Ahiezer +1 more·2016·Journal of Veterinary Medicine

Abstract

We performed experiments in cats with a spinal cord penetrating hemisection at T13-L1 level, with and without tamoxifen treatment. The results showed that the numbers of the ipsilateral and contralateral ventral horn neurons were reduced to less than half in the nontreated animals compared with the treated ones. Also, axons myelin sheet was preserved to almost normal values in treated cats. On the contrary, in the untreated animals, their myelin sheet was reduced to 28% at 30 days after injury (DAI), in both the ipsilateral and contralateral regions of the spinal cord. Additionally, we made hindlimb kinematics experiments to study the effects of tamoxifen on cat locomotion after the injury: at 4, 16, and 30 DAI. We observed that the ipsilateral hindlimb angular displacement (AD) of the pendulum-like movements (PLM) during gait locomotion was recovered to almost normal values in treated cats. Contralateral PLM acquired similar values to those obtained in intact cats. At 4 DAI, untreated animals showed a compensatory increment of PLM occurring in the contralateral hindlimb, which was partially recovered at 30 DAI. Our findings indicate that tamoxifen exerts a neuroprotective effect and preserves or produces myelinated axons, which could benefit the locomotion recovery in injured cats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2016/9561968

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 21 days of tamoxifen treatment beginning immediately after SCI reduced inflammation, decreased glial reactivity, promoted cell survival, increased white matter sparing, and enhanced functional recovery in rats and cats.

    “21 days of tamoxifen treatment beginning immediately after SCI reduced inflammation, decreased glial reactivity, promoted cell survival, increased white matter sparing, and enhanced functional recovery in rats and cats [38–43].”

    From Delayed short-term tamoxifen treatment does not promote remyelination or neuron sparing after spinal cord injury (2020) · cites this paper as [39]

    Methods (§2.2) says the cats received tamoxifen on days 0, 1, and 2 after injury, not for 21 days. Results (§§3.3–3.5) support neuronal and myelin preservation and improved gait in cats; the Discussion (§4) reports anti-inflammatory effects in rats from earlier work. This paper does not establish reduced glial reactivity or increased white matter sparing after the stated 21-day regimen in rats and cats. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Tamoxifen administration immediately after SCI reduces this response in part by promoting cell survival.

    “Studies have shown that tamoxifen administration immediately after SCI reduces this response in part by promoting cell survival [39, 41, 55].”

    From Delayed short-term tamoxifen treatment does not promote remyelination or neuron sparing after spinal cord injury (2020) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Methods (§2.2; page unavailable) report tamoxifen treatment beginning on the day of injury, and the Results (§3.4; page unavailable) report increased neuronal survival in treated cats. The Introduction describes tamoxifen as a proposed inflammatory-response modulator, but this study does not show that promoting cell survival is how it reduces that response. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies began tamoxifen treatment within 24 hours of injury, then gave low doses of tamoxifen chronically via intraperitoneal injection or intrathecal infusion.

    “Previous studies began tamoxifen treatment within 24 hours of injury, then gave low doses of tamoxifen chronically via intraperitoneal injection [39, 41] or intrathecal infusion [40, 55].”

    From Delayed short-term tamoxifen treatment does not promote remyelination or neuron sparing after spinal cord injury (2020) · cites this paper as [39]

    Methods §2.2 reports tamoxifen at 1 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection on days 0, 1, and 2 after injury, supporting early treatment and the route attributed to this source. It describes only a three-day course, not chronic treatment. The sentence assigns intrathecal infusion to other citations. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These results contradict other CNS trauma studies that show tamoxifen improves anatomical and motor recovery in female and male SCI rodents.

    “These results contradict other CNS trauma studies that show tamoxifen improves anatomical and motor recovery in female and male SCI rodents [39–41, 55], but this is likely attributed to differences in the timing of dosing.”

    From Delayed short-term tamoxifen treatment does not promote remyelination or neuron sparing after spinal cord injury (2020) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Introduction and Discussion report beneficial effects of tamoxifen in rats after spinal cord injury, and the Conclusions describe earlier positive neuroprotective effects in rodents. But this paper’s own anatomical and gait-recovery findings are from cats; our copy does not establish those combined outcomes in both female and male SCI rodents. No page numbers were provided for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This is opposite of previous reports that suggest tamoxifen is neuroprotective and increases neuron survival.

    “This is opposite of previous reports that suggest tamoxifen is neuroprotective and increases neuron survival [39, 41, 42, 55].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. [1]Jacobs R. R. Asher M. A. Snider R. K. Thoracolumbar spinal injuries. A comparative study of recumbent and operative treatment in 100 patients Spine 1980 5 5 463 477 10.1097/00007632-198009000-00012 2-s2.0-0019159491 7455777 · DOI
  2. [3]Tester N. J. Howland D. R. Chondroitinase ABC improves basic and skilled locomotion in spinal cord injured cats Experimental Neurology 2008 209 2 483 496 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.07.019 2-s2.0-38649143667 17936753 PMC2827296 · DOI
  3. [4]Rossignol S. Giroux N. Chau C. Marcoux J. Brustein E. Reader T. A. Pharmacological aids to locomotor training after spinal injury in the cat Journal of Physiology 2001 533 1 65 74 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0065b.x 2-s2.0-0035867071 11351014 PMC2278596 · DOI
  4. [5]Pertici V. Pin-Barre C. Felix M.-S. Laurin J. Brisswalter J. Decherchi P. A new method to assess weight-bearing distribution after central nervous system lesions in rats Behavioural Brain Research 2014 259 78 84 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.10.043 2-s2.0-84888119862 24200548 · DOI
  5. [6]Martinez M. Delivet-Mongrain H. Leblond H. Rossignol S. Recovery of hindlimb locomotion after incomplete spinal cord injury in the cat involves spontaneous compensatory changes within the spinal locomotor circuitry Journal of Neurophysiology 2011 106 4 1969 1984 10.1152/jn.00368.2011 2-s2.0-80054027109 21775717 · DOI
  6. [7]Franco Rodríguez N. Dueñas Jiménez J. De la Torre Valdovinos B. López Ruiz J. Hernández Hernández L. Dueñas Jiménez S. Tamoxifen favoured the rat sensorial cortex regeneration after a penetrating brain injury Brain Research Bulletin 2013 98 64 75 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2013.07.007 23886572 · DOI
  7. [8]Tian D.-S. Liu J.-L. Xie M.-J. Tamoxifen attenuates inflammatory-mediated damage and improves functional outcome after spinal cord injury in rats Journal of Neurochemistry 2009 109 6 1658 1667 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06077.x 2-s2.0-65949095026 19457130 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [9]İsmailoğlu Ö. Oral B. Görgülü A. Sütçü R. Demir N. Neuroprotective effects of tamoxifen on experimental spinal cord injury in rats Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2010 17 10 1306 1310 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.01.049 2-s2.0-77955653000 20630763 · DOI
  9. [10]Luque Contreras D. Jiménez Estrada I. Martínez Fong D. Hindlimb claudication reflects impaired nitric oxide-dependent revascularization after ischemia Vascular Pharmacology 2007 46 1 10 15 10.1016/j.vph.2006.06.017 2-s2.0-33845456672 17011243 · DOI
  10. [11]Kim K. K. Adelstein R. S. Kawamoto S. Identification of neuronal nuclei (NeuN) as Fox-3, a new member of the Fox-1 gene family of splicing factors The Journal of Biological Chemistry 2009 284 45 31052 31061 10.1074/jbc.m109.052969 2-s2.0-70949092754 19713214 PMC2781505 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [12]Cohen-Adad J. Leblond H. Delivet-Mongrain H. Martinez M. Benali H. Rossignol S. Wallerian degeneration after spinal cord lesions in cats detected with diffusion tensor imaging NeuroImage 2011 57 3 1068 1076 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.068 2-s2.0-79959743868 21596140 · DOI
  12. [14]Gibson D. F. C. Gottardis M. M. Jordan V. C. Sensitivity and insensitivity of breast cancer to tamoxifen The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 1990 37 6 765 770 10.1016/0960-0760(90)90417-j 2285588 · DOI
  13. [15]Lymperatou D. Giannopoulou E. Koutras A. K. Kalofonos H. P. The exposure of breast cancer cells to fulvestrant and tamoxifen modulates cell migration differently BioMed Research International 2013 2013 14 147514 10.1155/2013/147514 2-s2.0-84880867110 PMC3713599 23936773 · DOI
  14. [16]Dhandapani K. M. Brann D. W. Protective effects of estrogen and selective estrogen receptor modulators in the brain Biology of Reproduction 2002 67 5 1379 1385 10.1095/biolreprod.102.003848 2-s2.0-0036838768 12390866 · DOI
  15. [17]Tapia-Gonzalez S. Carrero P. Pernia O. Garcia-Segura L. M. Diz-Chaves Y. Selective oestrogen receptor (ER) modulators reduce microglia reactivity in vivo after peripheral inflammation: potential role of microglial ERs Journal of Endocrinology 2008 198 1 219 230 10.1677/joe-07-0294 2-s2.0-47849095720 18460549 · DOI
  16. [18]Blight A. R. Decrescito V. Morphometric analysis of experimental spinal cord injury in the cat: the relation of injury intensity to survival of myelinated axons Neuroscience 1986 19 1 321 341 10.1016/0306-4522(86)90025-4 2-s2.0-0022444725 3785669 · DOI
  17. [19]Kuo J.-R. Wang C.-C. Huang S.-K. Wang S.-J. Tamoxifen depresses glutamate release through inhibition of voltage-dependent Ca2+ entry and protein kinase Cα in rat cerebral cortex nerve terminals Neurochemistry International 2012 60 2 105 114 10.1016/j.neuint.2011.11.014 2-s2.0-84855231371 22142530 · DOI
  18. [20]Ward R. E. Huang W. Kostusiak M. Pallier P. N. Michael-Titus A. T. Priestley J. V. A characterization of white matter pathology following spinal cord compression injury in the rat Neuroscience 2014 260 227 239 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.12.024 2-s2.0-84892490179 24361176 · DOI
  19. [21]Nadella R. Voutilainen M. H. Saarma M. Transient transfection of human CDNF gene reduces the 6-hydroxydopamine-induced neuroinflammation in the rat substantia nigra Journal of Neuroinflammation 2014 11 1, article 209 10.1186/s12974-014-0209-0 PMC4275959 25511018 · DOI
  20. [23]Grossman S. D. Wolfe B. B. Yasuda R. P. Wrathall J. R. Changes in NMDA receptor subunit expression in response to contusive spinal cord injury Journal of Neurochemistry 2000 75 1 174 184 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0750174.x 2-s2.0-0034085532 10854260 · DOI
  21. [24]Evrard H. C. Balthazart J. Localization of oestrogen receptors in the sensory and motor areas of the spinal cord in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) Journal of Neuroendocrinology 2002 14 11 894 903 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2002.00857.x 2-s2.0-0036854597 12421343 · DOI
  22. [25]Hösli E. Hösli L. Cellular localization of estrogen receptors on neurones in various regions of cultured rat CNS: Coexistence with cholinergic and galanin receptors International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 1999 17 4 317 330 10.1016/s0736-5748(99)00038-6 2-s2.0-0032798313 10479067 · DOI
  23. [26]Papka R. E. Storey-Workley M. Shughrue P. J. Estrogen receptor-α and -β immunoreactivity and mRNA in neurons of sensory and autonomic ganglia and spinal cord Cell and Tissue Research 2001 304 2 193 214 10.1007/s004410100363 2-s2.0-0035004783 11396714 · DOI
  24. [27]VanderHorst V. G. J. M. Meijer E. Schasfoort F. C. Van Leeuwen F. W. Holstege G. Estrogen receptor-immunoreactive neurons in the lumbosacral cord projecting to the periaqueductal gray in the ovariectomized female cat Neuroscience Letters 1997 236 1 25 28 10.1016/s0304-3940(97)00750-7 2-s2.0-0031585489 9404943 · DOI
  25. [28]Crone S. A. Quinlan K. A. Zagoraiou L. Genetic ablation of V2a ipsilateral interneurons disrupts left-right locomotor coordination in mammalian spinal cord Neuron 2008 60 1 70 83 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.08.009 2-s2.0-53049089487 18940589 · DOI
  26. [29]Campbell J. B. DeCrescito V. Tomasula J. J. Demopoulos H. B. Flamm E. S. Ransohoff J. Experimental treatment of spinal cord contusion in the cat Surgical Neurology 1973 1 2 102 106 2-s2.0-0015601232 4772792
  27. [30]Brustein E. Rossignol S. Recovery of locomotion after ventral and ventrolateral spinal lesions in the cat. I. Deficits and adaptive mechanisms Journal of Neurophysiology 1998 80 3 1245 1267 2-s2.0-0031759023 9744936
  28. [31]Brustein E. Rossignol S. Recovery of locomotion after ventral and ventrolateral spinal lesions in the cat. II. Effects of noradrenergic and serotoninergic drugs Journal of Neurophysiology 1999 81 4 1513 1530 2-s2.0-0033020942 10200188
  29. [32]Jordan L. M. Liu J. Hedlund P. B. Akay T. Pearson K. G. Descending command systems for the initiation of locomotion in mammals Brain Research Reviews 2008 57 1 183 191 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.07.019 2-s2.0-36749061303 17928060 · DOI
  30. [33]Doperalski A. E. Tester N. J. Jefferson S. C. Howland D. R. Altered obstacle negotiation after low thoracic hemisection in the cat Journal of Neurotrauma 2011 28 9 1983 1993 10.1089/neu.2010.1457 2-s2.0-80054803066 21682603 PMC3172876 · DOI
  31. [34]Hurd C. Weishaupt N. Fouad K. Anatomical correlates of recovery in single pellet reaching in spinal cord injured rats Experimental Neurology 2013 247 605 614 10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.02.013 2-s2.0-84881372804 23470552 · DOI

Authors
de la Torre Valdovinos, B., Duenas Jimenez, J. M., Estrada, I. J., Banuelos Pineda, J., Franco Rodriguez, N. E., Lopez Ruiz, J. R., Osuna Carrasco, L. P., Candanedo Arellano, A., & Duenas Jimenez, S. H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Computer Science, CUCEI, Universidad de Guadalajara, Avenida Revolucion No. 1500 Building M, Laboratory 212, 44430 Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico
  • Department of Physiology, CUCS Universidad de Guadalajara, Sierra Mojada 950, Building P Third Floor, 44290 Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico
  • Department of Physiology Biophysics and Neurosciences, Centro de Investigacion y Estudios Avanzados IPN, Avenida Instituto Politecnico Nacional 2508, 07360 Mexico City, DF, Mexico
  • Department of Veterinary and Medicine, CUCBA Universidad de Guadalajara, Camino Ing. Ramon Padilla Sanchez 2100, 45110 Zapopan, JAL, Mexico
  • Department of Neuroscience, CUCS Universidad de Guadalajara, Sierra Mojada 950, Building P Third Floor, 44290 Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico
Venue
Journal of Veterinary Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-23
Volume
2016
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 2314-6966 (ISSN-L)
  • 2356-7708
OpenAlex
W2286893582
Cited by
16
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Veterinary Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universidad de Guadalajara
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
tamoxifen, spinal cord injury, myelination, neuroprotection, locomotor recovery, ventral horn neurons, hindlimb kinematics, cats, hemisection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review