Cited by 98Spinal Cord Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesNerve injury and regeneration

Tamoxifen attenuates inflammatory-mediated damage and improves functional outcome after spinal cord injury in rats

Tian, Dai‐Shi, Liu, Jun‐Li, Xie, Min‐Jie, Zhan, Yan, Qu, Wen‐Sheng, Yu, Zhi‐Yuan, Tang, Zhou‐Ping, Pan, Deng‐Ji +1 more·2009·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Tamoxifen has been found to be neuroprotective in both transient and permanent experimental ischemic stroke. However, it remains unknown whether this agent shows a similar beneficial effect after spinal cord injury (SCI), and what are its underlying mechanisms. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of tamoxifen treatment in attenuating SCI-induced pathology. Blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) permeability, tissue edema formation, microglial activation, neuronal cell death and myelin loss were determined in rats subjected to spinal cord contusion. The results showed that tamoxifen, administered at 30 min post-injury, significantly decreased interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) production induced by microglial activation, alleviated the amount of Evans blue leakage and edema formation. In addition, tamoxifen treatment clearly reduced the number of apoptotic neurons post-SCI. The myelin loss and the increase in production of myelin-associated axonal growth inhibitors were also found to be significantly attenuated at day 3 post-injury. Furthermore, rats treated with tamoxifen scored much higher on the locomotor rating scale after SCI than did vehicle-treated rats, suggesting improved functional outcome after SCI. Together, these results demonstrate that tamoxifen provides neuroprotective effects for treatment of SCI-related pathology and disability, and is therefore a potential neuroprotectant for human spinal cord injury therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06077.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tian, D., Liu, J., Xie, M., Zhan, Y., Qu, W., Yu, Z., Tang, Z., Pan, D., & Wang, W.
Affiliations
Tongji Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Wei
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05-21
Volume
109
Issue
6
Pages
1658-1667
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W1982466660
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
tamoxifen, spinal cord injury, neuroprotection, spinal cord contusion, blood-spinal cord barrier permeability, microglial activation, IL-1β, neuronal apoptosis, demyelination, tissue edema, locomotor recovery, anti-inflammatory therapy
MeSH terms
Nogo Proteins, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Blood-Brain Barrier, Disease Models, Animal, Double-Blind Method, Edema, Estrogen Antagonists, Gene Expression Regulation, Indoles, Inflammation, Male, Myelin Proteins, Myelin Sheath, Peptide Fragments, Phosphopyruvate Hydratase, Spinal Cord Injuries, Tamoxifen, Time Factors, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Apoptosis, Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein, Recovery of Function, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, CD11b Antigen, Rats, Interleukin-1beta

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review