Cited by 231

Automated Classification of Lung Cancer Types from Cytological Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

Teramoto, Atsushi, Tsukamoto, Tetsuya, Kiriyama, Yuka, Fujita, Hiroshi·2017·BioMed Research International

Abstract

Lung cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. Currently, in differential diagnosis of lung cancer, accurate classification of cancer types (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma) is required. However, improving the accuracy and stability of diagnosis is challenging. In this study, we developed an automated classification scheme for lung cancers presented in microscopic images using a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN), which is a major deep learning technique. The DCNN used for classification consists of three convolutional layers, three pooling layers, and two fully connected layers. In evaluation experiments conducted, the DCNN was trained using our original database with a graphics processing unit. Microscopic images were first cropped and resampled to obtain images with resolution of 256 × 256 pixels and, to prevent overfitting, collected images were augmented via rotation, flipping, and filtering. The probabilities of three types of cancers were estimated using the developed scheme and its classification accuracy was evaluated using threefold cross validation. In the results obtained, approximately 71% of the images were classified correctly, which is on par with the accuracy of cytotechnologists and pathologists. Thus, the developed scheme is useful for classification of lung cancers from microscopic images.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2017/4067832

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A deep convolutional neural network on 301 lung carcinoma CT images identified lung cancer with sensitivity 0.93, precision 0.82, and overall accuracy approximately 71%, comparable to cytotechnologists and pathologists.

    “Probabilities for three cancer types were estimated, and threefold cross-validation reported a sensitivity of 0.93, precision of 0.82, and overall accuracy of approximately 71%, comparable to that of cytotechnologists and pathologists.”
  • Teramoto et al. evaluated 298 images using DCNNs and achieved classification accuracies of 89% for adenocarcinoma, 60% for squamous cell carcinoma, and 70% for small-cell lung cancer, outperforming both cytotechnologists and pathologists.

    “Teramoto et al. evaluated 298 images using DCNNs and achieved classification accuracies of 89% for adenocarcinoma, 60% for squamous cell carcinoma, and 70% for small-cell lung cancer—outperforming both cytotechnologists and pathologists [31].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [2]Baas P. Belderbos J. S. A. Senan S. Concurrent chemotherapy (carboplatin, paclitaxel, etoposide) and involved-field radiotherapy in limited stage small cell lung cancer: a dutch multicenter phase II study British Journal of Cancer 2006 94 5 625 630 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602979 2-s2.0-33644840888 16465191 PMC2361215 · DOI
  2. [3]Travis W. D. Brambilla E. Burke A. Marx A. Nicholson A. G. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Lung, Pieura, Thymus, and Heart 2015 Lyon, France IARC 26291007
  3. [4]He L. Long L. R. Antani S. Thoma G. R. Histology image analysis for carcinoma detection and grading Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2012 107 3 538 556 2-s2.0-84863869228 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.12.007 22436890 PMC3587978 · DOI
  4. [5]Barker J. Hoogi A. Depeursinge A. Rubin D. L. Automated classification of brain tumor type in whole-slide digital pathology images using local representative tiles Medical Image Analysis 2016 30 60 71 2-s2.0-84956999616 10.1016/j.media.2015.12.002 26854941 · DOI
  5. [7]Ficsor L. Varga V. S. Tagscherer A. Tulassay Z. Molnar B. Automated classification of inflammation in colon histological sections based on digital microscopy and advanced image analysis Cytometry Part A 2008 73A 3 230 237 10.1002/cyto.a.20527 2-s2.0-40049108865 18228558 · DOI
  6. [8]Krizhevsky A. Sutskever I. Hinton G. E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2012 25 1106 1114
  7. [9]LeCun Y. Bengio Y. Hinton G. Deep learning Nature 2015 521 7553 436 444 10.1038/nature14539 26017442 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [10]Anthimopoulos M. Christodoulidis S. Ebner L. Christe A. Mougiakakou S. Lung Pattern Classification for Interstitial Lung Diseases Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2016 35 5 1207 1216 2-s2.0-84968662241 10.1109/TMI.2016.2535865 26955021 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [11]Cha K. H. Hadjiiski L. Samala R. K. Chan H.-P. Caoili E. M. Cohan R. H. Urinary bladder segmentation in CT urography using deep-learning convolutional neural network and level sets Medical Physics 2016 43 4 1882 1886 2-s2.0-84973293116 10.1118/1.4944498 27036584 PMC4808067 · DOI
  10. [12]Teramoto A. Fujita H. Yamamuro O. Tamaki T. Automated detection of pulmonary nodules in PET/CT images: Ensemble false-positive reduction using a convolutional neural network technique Medical Physics 2016 43 6 2821 2827 2-s2.0-84969776874 10.1118/1.4948498 27277030 · DOI
  11. [13]Miki Y. Muramatsu C. Hayashi T. Classification of teeth in cone-beam CT using deep convolutional neural network Computers in Biology and Medicine 2017 80 24 29 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.11.003 27889430 · DOI
  12. [14]Ciresan D. C. Giusti A. Gambardella L. M. Schmidhuber J. Mitosis detection in breast cancer histology images with deep neural networks Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2011 2013 8150 Berlin, Germany Springer 411 418 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 10.1007/978-3-642-40763-5_51 24579167 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [15]Wang H. Cruz-Roa A. Basavanhally A. Mitosis detection in breast cancer pathology images by combining handcrafted and convolutional neural network features Journal of Medical Imaging 2014 1 3 p. 034003 10.1117/1.JMI.1.3.034003 PMC4479031 26158062 · DOI
  14. [16]Ertosun M. G. Rubin D. L. Automated grading of gliomas using deep learning in digital pathology images: A modular approach with ensemble of convolutional neural networks Proceedings of the In AMIA Annual Symposium 2015 1899 1908 PMC4765616 26958289
  15. [17]Xu J. Luo X. Wang G. Gilmore H. Madabhushi A. A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for segmenting and classifying epithelial and stromal regions in histopathological images Neurocomputing 2016 191 214 223 2-s2.0-84977845763 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.01.034 28154470 PMC5283391 · DOI
  16. [19]Jia Y. Shelhamer E. Donahue J. Caffe: convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia November 2014 Orlando, FL, USA ACM 675 678 10.1145/2647868.2654889 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [20]Nizzoli R. Tiseo M. Gelsomino F. Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in the pathological typing of non-small cell lung cancer Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2011 6 3 489 493 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31820b86cb 2-s2.0-79951767771 21258246 · DOI
  18. [21]Sigel C. S. Moreira A. L. Travis W. D. Subtyping of non-small cell lung carcinoma: A comparison of small biopsy and cytology specimens Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2011 6 11 1849 1856 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318227142d 2-s2.0-80054935174 21841504 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teramoto, A., Tsukamoto, T., Kiriyama, Y., & Fujita, H.
Affiliations
  • School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake City, Aichi 470-1192, Japan
  • School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake City, Aichi 470-1192, Japan
  • Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
Venue
BioMed Research International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017
Volume
2017
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 2314-6133
  • 2314-6141
Cited by
231
References
1
Language
en
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review