The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-Analysis and Evidence Base for the Efficacy of Autologous Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Knee Cartilage Repair: Methodological Guidelines and Quality Assessment
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this study is to review all the published clinical trials on autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) in the repair of cartilage lesions of the knee. We performed a comprehensive search in three electronic databases: PubMed, Medline via Ovid, and Web of Science. A systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of PRISMA protocol and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The modified Coleman methodology score was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the effect size for Pain and function change after receiving BM-MSCs. Thirty-three studies—including 724 patients of mean age 44.2 years—were eligible. 50.7% of the included patients received cultured BM-MSCs for knee cartilage repair. There was improvement in the MINORS quality score over time with a positive correlation with the publication year. Meta-analysis indicated better improvement and statistical significance in the Visual Analog Scale for Pain, IKDC Function, Tegner Activity Scale, and Lysholm Knee Score after administration of noncultured BM-MSCs when compared to evaluation before the treatment. Meanwhile, there was a clear methodological defect in most studies with an average modified Coleman methodology score (MCMS) of 55. BM-MSCs revealed a clinically relevant improvement in pain, function, and histological regeneration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Leukocyte-poor PRP may be superior for tendinopathy, whereas leukocyte-rich PRP may be more effective in ligament and cartilage repair.
“Some evidence suggests leukocyte-poor PRP may be superior for tendinopathy, whereas leukocyte-rich PRP may be more effective in ligament and cartilage repair [97].”
From Advancements in Regenerative Therapies for Orthopedics: A Comprehensive Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Peptide Therapies, and Biomimetic Applications (2025) · cites this paper as [97]
The Discussion describes platelet-rich fibrin glue used with stem cells for cartilage defects, and §5.4 mentions PRP as a possible additional agent. Neither passage compares leukocyte-poor with leukocyte-rich PRP or addresses tendinopathy and ligament repair; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vandenbroucke, J. P., von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., Egger, M., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297 · Cited by 8,613
Vandenbroucke, J. P., Elm, E. V., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., Egger, M., & initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-w1 · Cited by 3,543
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- 1993, Bulletin/Hospital for Joint Diseases, 53, 41
- 10.1007/s12026-015-8720-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.joca.2007.07.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/art.24984 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00264-010-0959-y · DOI
- 10.3810/psm.2011.02.1867 · DOI
- 10.1002/14651858.CD005328.pub2 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546508328414 · DOI
- 10.3310/hta21060 · DOI
- 10.1097/00003086-200208000-00020 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12178-012-9132-0 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.blo.0000143938.30681.9d · DOI
- 10.1016/j.berh.2007.12.001 · DOI
- 1994, Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 21, 429, 10.1016/S0094-1298(20)31020-8 · DOI
- 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0062 · DOI
- 10.1089/ten.1998.4.415 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcb.20546 · DOI
- 10.2147/SCCAA.S42880 · DOI
- 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00001 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546509351649 · DOI
- 2008, Pain Physician, 11, 343
- 10.1002/term.299 · DOI
- 2011, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 94, 395
- 10.1016/j.knee.2014.10.003 · DOI
- 10.1053/joca.2001.0504 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.09.074 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12967-016-0998-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.knee.2013.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1177/1947603514563597 · DOI
- 10.1177/1947603510392023 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00167-016-3984-6 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00590-013-1393-9 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546516662455 · DOI
- 10.5604/15093492.1058409 · DOI
- 2013, Ortopedia, Traumatologia, Rehabilitacja, 15, 69
- 10.1007/s12306-013-0242-7 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546516656179 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11999-009-0885-8 · DOI
- 10.1177/03946320110241S213 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eats.2012.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1177/1947603510366027 · DOI
- 10.2174/1876893801304010007 · DOI
- 2005, The Journal of Rheumatology, 32, 1615
- 10.1080/14653240600855905 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/TP.0b013e318291a2da · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2011.01599.x · DOI
- 2012, Archives of Iranian Medicine, 15, 422
- 10.4172/2157-7633.1000285 · DOI
- 2016, World Journal of Plastic Surgery, 5, 168
- 10.2106/JBJS.M.00058 · DOI
- 2012, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 41, 511, 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V41N11p511 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546509359067 · DOI
- 10.14573/altex.2010.1.53 · DOI
- 2002, Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 30, 219, 10.1177/026119290203000208 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.joca.2006.08.008 · DOI
- 10.1002/term.8 · DOI
- 10.1002/stem.139 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00344.x · DOI
- 2010, Journal of the Indian Medical Association, 108, 583
- 10.1002/jcp.21200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.08.013 · DOI
- 10.1089/ten.2006.12.527 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.22285 · DOI
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4690 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.c869 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00303 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Goulian, A. J., Goldstein, B., & Saad, M. A. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14062061 · Cited by 25
“Some evidence suggests leukocyte-poor PRP may be superior for tendinopathy, whereas leukocyte-rich PRP may be more effective in ligament and cartilage repair [97].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Awad, M. E., Hussein, K. A., Helwa, I., Abdelsamid, M. F., Aguilar-Perez, A., Mohsen, I., Hunter, M., Hamrick, M. W., Isales, C. M., Elsalanty, M., Hill, W. D., & Fulzele, S.
- Affiliations
- Augusta University (US)
- National Research Centre (EG)
- Misr International University (EG)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Anatomy and Cell Biology Department-Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Fayoum University (EG)
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hill, William D.
- Fulzele, Sadanand
- ORCID
- Venue
- Stem Cells International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-04-07
- Volume
- 2019
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 1687-966X (ISSN-L)
- 1687-9678
- PMC
- PMC6476108
- OpenAlex
- W2934303176
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Stem Cells International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Mesenchymal stem cell research
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
- Keywords
- autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, knee cartilage repair, cartilage damage, pain outcomes, knee function, cartilage regeneration, study quality assessment, IKDC score, Lysholm score, Tegner score
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review