Cited by 39Osteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsMesenchymal stem cell researchPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meta-Analysis and Evidence Base for the Efficacy of Autologous Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Knee Cartilage Repair: Methodological Guidelines and Quality Assessment

Open access

Abstract

The aim of this study is to review all the published clinical trials on autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) in the repair of cartilage lesions of the knee. We performed a comprehensive search in three electronic databases: PubMed, Medline via Ovid, and Web of Science. A systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of PRISMA protocol and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The modified Coleman methodology score was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the effect size for Pain and function change after receiving BM-MSCs. Thirty-three studies—including 724 patients of mean age 44.2 years—were eligible. 50.7% of the included patients received cultured BM-MSCs for knee cartilage repair. There was improvement in the MINORS quality score over time with a positive correlation with the publication year. Meta-analysis indicated better improvement and statistical significance in the Visual Analog Scale for Pain, IKDC Function, Tegner Activity Scale, and Lysholm Knee Score after administration of noncultured BM-MSCs when compared to evaluation before the treatment. Meanwhile, there was a clear methodological defect in most studies with an average modified Coleman methodology score (MCMS) of 55. BM-MSCs revealed a clinically relevant improvement in pain, function, and histological regeneration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2019/3826054

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leukocyte-poor PRP may be superior for tendinopathy, whereas leukocyte-rich PRP may be more effective in ligament and cartilage repair.

    “Some evidence suggests leukocyte-poor PRP may be superior for tendinopathy, whereas leukocyte-rich PRP may be more effective in ligament and cartilage repair [97].”

    From Advancements in Regenerative Therapies for Orthopedics: A Comprehensive Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Peptide Therapies, and Biomimetic Applications (2025) · cites this paper as [97]

    The Discussion describes platelet-rich fibrin glue used with stem cells for cartilage defects, and §5.4 mentions PRP as a possible additional agent. Neither passage compares leukocyte-poor with leukocyte-rich PRP or addresses tendinopathy and ligament repair; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. 1993, Bulletin/Hospital for Joint Diseases, 53, 41
  2. 10.1007/s12026-015-8720-7 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.joca.2007.07.005 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1002/art.24984 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s00264-010-0959-y · DOI
  7. 10.3810/psm.2011.02.1867 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/14651858.CD005328.pub2 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/0363546508328414 · DOI
  10. 10.3310/hta21060 · DOI
  11. 10.1097/00003086-200208000-00020 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s12178-012-9132-0 · DOI
  13. 10.1097/01.blo.0000143938.30681.9d · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.berh.2007.12.001 · DOI
  15. 1994, Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 21, 429, 10.1016/S0094-1298(20)31020-8 · DOI
  16. 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0062 · DOI
  17. 10.1089/ten.1998.4.415 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/jcb.20546 · DOI
  19. 10.2147/SCCAA.S42880 · DOI
  20. 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00001 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/0363546509351649 · DOI
  22. 2008, Pain Physician, 11, 343
  23. 10.1002/term.299 · DOI
  24. 2011, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 94, 395
  25. 10.1016/j.knee.2014.10.003 · DOI
  26. 10.1053/joca.2001.0504 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.09.074 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1186/s12967-016-0998-2 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.knee.2013.04.003 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/1947603514563597 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/1947603510392023 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s00167-016-3984-6 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s00590-013-1393-9 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/0363546516662455 · DOI
  35. 10.5604/15093492.1058409 · DOI
  36. 2013, Ortopedia, Traumatologia, Rehabilitacja, 15, 69
  37. 10.1007/s12306-013-0242-7 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/0363546516656179 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s11999-009-0885-8 · DOI
  40. 10.1177/03946320110241S213 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.eats.2012.07.001 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/1947603510366027 · DOI
  43. 10.2174/1876893801304010007 · DOI
  44. 2005, The Journal of Rheumatology, 32, 1615
  45. 10.1080/14653240600855905 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1097/TP.0b013e318291a2da · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2011.01599.x · DOI
  48. 2012, Archives of Iranian Medicine, 15, 422
  49. 10.4172/2157-7633.1000285 · DOI
  50. 2016, World Journal of Plastic Surgery, 5, 168
  51. 10.2106/JBJS.M.00058 · DOI
  52. 2012, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 41, 511, 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V41N11p511 · DOI
  53. 10.1177/0363546509359067 · DOI
  54. 10.14573/altex.2010.1.53 · DOI
  55. 2002, Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 30, 219, 10.1177/026119290203000208 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/j.joca.2006.08.008 · DOI
  57. 10.1002/term.8 · DOI
  58. 10.1002/stem.139 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.07.003 · DOI
  60. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00344.x · DOI
  61. 2010, Journal of the Indian Medical Association, 108, 583
  62. 10.1002/jcp.21200 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.08.013 · DOI
  64. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.527 · DOI
  65. 10.1002/art.22285 · DOI
  66. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4690 · DOI
  67. 10.1136/bmj.c869 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00303 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Awad, M. E., Hussein, K. A., Helwa, I., Abdelsamid, M. F., Aguilar-Perez, A., Mohsen, I., Hunter, M., Hamrick, M. W., Isales, C. M., Elsalanty, M., Hill, W. D., & Fulzele, S.
Affiliations
  • Augusta University (US)
  • National Research Centre (EG)
  • Misr International University (EG)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Anatomy and Cell Biology Department-Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
  • Fayoum University (EG)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hill, William D.
  • Fulzele, Sadanand
Venue
Stem Cells International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-07
Volume
2019
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 1687-966X (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-9678
OpenAlex
W2934303176
Cited by
39
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stem Cells International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, knee cartilage repair, cartilage damage, pain outcomes, knee function, cartilage regeneration, study quality assessment, IKDC score, Lysholm score, Tegner score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review