The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dietary Iron Intake in Women of Reproductive Age in Europe: A Review of 49 Studies from 29 Countries in the Period 1993–2015
Abstract
Objective. Assessment of dietary iron intake in women of reproductive age in Europe. Design. Review. Setting. Literature search of dietary surveys reporting intake of iron using PubMed, Internet browsers, and national nutrient databases in the period 1993–2015. Subjects. Women of reproductive age. Results. 49 dietary surveys/studies in 29 European countries were included. Belgium, Bosnia, Denmark, Hungary, Italy, Northern Ireland, Serbia, Scotland, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom/England, and Wales reported a median/mean iron intake of 7.6–9.9 mg/day. Finland, Iceland, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, and Spain reported an intake of 10.0–10.7 mg/day. Austria, Estonia, France, and Russia reported an intake of 11.0–11.9 mg/day. Latvia and Germany reported an intake of 12.0–12.2 mg/day. Croatia, Lithuania, Portugal, and Slovakia reported an intake of 15.9–19.0 mg/day. The percentage of dietary iron consisting of heme iron, reported in 7 studies, varied from 4.3% in United Kingdom to 25% in Spain. Nutrient density for iron (mg iron/10 MJ, median/mean) varied from 11.8 in Sweden to 23.0 in Lithuania. The correlation between nutrient density and dietary iron was significant (p=0.0006). In most countries, the majority of women had a dietary iron intake below 15 mg/day. In Belgium, Denmark, Hungary, and Sweden, 91–95% of women had an intake below 15 mg/day. In Ireland and Germany, 61–78% had an intake below 15 mg/day. Conclusions. In Europe, 61–97% of women have a dietary iron intake below 15 mg/day. This contributes to a low iron status in many women. We need common European standardized dietary methods, uniform dietary reference values, and uniform statistical methods to perform intercountry comparisons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This may be explained by the known skewed distribution of iron intakes [66] and supplement use among MAs [32,67]”
From Dietary Intake of Masters Athletes: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [66]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Iron status in pregnant women and women of reproductive age in Europe
Milman, N., Taylor, C. L., Merkel, J., & Brannon, P. M. (2017) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.117.156000 · Cited by 225
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- 10.3945/ajcn.117.155804 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3109/00016346409155829 · DOI
- 10.3109/00016349309021150 · DOI
- 10.1007/bf01698138 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00277-010-1144-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s002770100371 · DOI
- 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4254 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.e15121 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/s0007114509990572 · DOI
- 10.17221/160/2013-cjfs · DOI
- 2016, The Belgian Food Consumption Survey
- 10.1159/000103278 · DOI
- 2016, The belgian food consumption survey 2014-2015
- 2016, Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 1071, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/09637480701252393 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00394-003-0425-3 · DOI
- 2013, The national FINDIET 2012 survey
- 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600561 · DOI
- 10.1017/s0007114509992625 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601923 · DOI
- 10.1556/oh.2007.28017 · DOI
- 10.1556/oh.2012.29379 · DOI
- 2017, Orvosi Hetilap, 158, 803, 10.1556/650.2017.30773 · DOI
- 10.1017/s1368980009005035 · DOI · Paper page
- 1997, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 51, S51
- 2001, Public Health Nutrition, 4, 1183
- 10.1017/s1368980008003595 · DOI
- 10.2105/ajph.88.4.576 · DOI
- 10.1017/s1368980017001240 · DOI
- 10.1006/jfca.2002.1075 · DOI
- 10.1017/s1368980007000961 · DOI
- 10.3109/09637489709028573 · DOI
- 10.3390/nu9030203 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12884-014-0373-3 · DOI
- 2019, Food and nutrient intake in adults in Sweden 2010–2011
- 10.1017/s1368980013000207 · DOI
- 10.1017/s0007114511002340 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ogc.2011.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, European Food Safety Authority Journal, 8
- 10.1038/sj/ejcn/160143210.1038/sj.ejcn.1601422 · DOI
- 10.1038/ejcn.2015.159 · DOI
- 10.3402/fnr.v53i0.2038 · DOI
- 10.1093/ajcn/54.6.1047 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2003.00090.x · DOI
- 10.1079/phn2001154 · DOI
- 10.1038/ejcn.2013.242 · DOI
- 10.3748/wjg.14.4101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/jn/136.11.2808 · DOI
- 10.1159/000332129 · DOI
Cited by
Dietary Intake of Masters Athletes: A Systematic Review
Guo, S., Shaoni, G. L. L., Stuart-Smith, W. A., Davies, A. J., & Gifford, J. A. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15234973 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Milman, N. T.
- Affiliations
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Næstved Hospital, University College Zealand, DK-4700 Næstved, Denmark
- ORCID
- Milman, Nils Thorm
- Venue
- Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-06-13
- Volume
- 2019
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 2090-0724
- 2090-0732
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dietary Iron Intake in Women of Reproductive Age in Europe: A Review of 49 Studies from 29 Countries in the Period 1993–2015. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2019/7631306
- The paper
- Milman, N. T. (2019). Dietary Iron Intake in Women of Reproductive Age in Europe: A Review of 49 Studies from 29 Countries in the Period 1993–2015. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7631306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.