Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 21Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseNutrition and Health Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 105 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Nutritional Status and Cardiovascular Health in Female Adolescent Elite-Level Artistic Gymnasts and Swimmers: A Cross-Sectional Study of 31 Athletes

Open access

Abstract

Objective. Nutritional status is important for health and competitive achievement. This area remains understudied among elite-level female athletes and is appropriate for research. We examined nutritional status and cardiovascular health markers of two groups of female athletes of the same age and competition period, involved in weight-bearing and a non-weight-bearing sport: gymnasts (n = 17) and swimmers (n = 14); mean age 17.4 and 16.6 years. Methods. Body composition and dietary intake were assessed by bioelectrical impedance and Food Frequency Questionnaire. The concentrations of serum micronutrients (B12, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25 (OH) D), calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, and iron), blood lipids, and blood pressure (BP) were measured. Setting and Participants. A cross-sectional study of 31 athletes from Slovenia. Results. Gymnasts had higher body mass index (21.5 vs. 20.1 kg/m2, p = 0.043 ) and lower fat free mass (42.4 vs. 46.6 kg, p = 0.024 ) than swimmers and comparable body fat percentage (22.5 vs. 22.8%). Both groups had low intake of carbohydrates, fibre, polyunsaturated fats, protein (only gymnasts), and micronutrients (11/13 micronutrients gymnasts and 4/13 swimmers) and high intake of free sugars and saturated fats. Both groups also had significantly lower-than-recommended serum levels of 25 (OH) D. All cardiovascular risk factors were within recommended ranges. Gymnasts had higher LDL cholesterol (2.7 vs. 2.2 mmol/L, p < 0.011 ), and swimmers had higher systolic BP (126 vs. 107 mmHg, p < 0.001 ). Conclusions. Dietary intake especially in gymnasts was suboptimal, which may reflect in anthropometric and cardiovascular marker differences between gymnasts and swimmers.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

In a cross-sectional study of 31 Slovenian elite female adolescent athletes, gymnasts had higher BMI and lower fat-free mass than swimmers, and both groups showed suboptimal dietary intake, especially gymnasts. Cardiovascular risk markers were mostly within recommended ranges, but gymnasts had higher LDL cholesterol and swimmers had higher systolic blood pressure.

Key findings

  • Gymnasts (n = 17) had higher BMI than swimmers (n = 14) (21.5 vs. 20.1 kg/m², p = 0.043) and lower fat-free mass (42.4 vs. 46.6 kg, p = 0.024), with comparable body fat percentage (22.5% vs. 22.8%).
  • Both groups had low intake of carbohydrates, fibre, and polyunsaturated fats; gymnasts also had low protein intake, and micronutrient intake was below recommendations for 11/13 micronutrients in gymnasts and 4/13 in swimmers. Both groups had high free sugar and saturated fat intake and low serum 25(OH)D.
  • Gymnasts had higher LDL cholesterol than swimmers (2.7 vs. 2.2 mmol/L, p < 0.011), while swimmers had higher systolic blood pressure (126 vs. 107 mmHg, p < 0.001).
  • All cardiovascular risk factors were, on average, within recommended ranges; energy availability was below recommended in both groups (23 ± 3 kcal/kg FFM/day in gymnasts and 33 ± 5 in swimmers vs. recommended 45 kcal/kg FFM/day).

Methods

  • Cross-sectional study of 31 elite-level female indoor athletes from Slovenia: 17 artistic gymnasts (mean age 17.4 ± 4.1 years) and 14 swimmers (mean age 16.6 ± 3.1 years), assessed during the competition period within three days (April 4–6, 2018).
  • Body composition was assessed by bioelectrical impedance; dietary intake by a 52-item qualitative Food Frequency Questionnaire; serum micronutrients, blood lipids, and blood pressure were measured after overnight fasting.
  • Between-group comparisons used Mann–Whitney U tests; intake versus recommendations used one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests; analyses performed in R 3.5.2.

Limitations

  • The paper states the sample size was relatively small, results should be interpreted with caution, and replication in larger samples is needed.
  • The paper acknowledges FFQ limitations: a planned 3-day weighed dietary protocol was not performed because coaches advised against it; the FFQ had limited items and a one-year recall period, was validated in a Dutch rather than Slovenian population, and dietary assessment may involve under- or misreporting, especially in elite female gymnasts.
  • The paper notes blood assays were obtained from two national medical laboratories separately for gymnasts and swimmers, and that a single assessment does not allow definitive conclusions about anthropometry, diet, or cardiovascular health.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2021/8810548

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 Dietary intake of elite-level artistic gymnasts and swimmers compared with recommendations [40–45].
Figure 1 Dietary intake of elite-level artistic gymnasts and swimmers compared with recommendations [40–45].CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 75 Not checked · 98 Own results and interpretations

62 more claims

Create a free account to see all 173 claims and to verify the 103 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 70
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 55

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

4 of 4

Citations

Cites

Show all 79 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Tanita, 2015, Body composition analyzer
  2. 10.1093/eurpub/cks096 · DOI · Paper page
  3. German Nutrition Society, 2018, Ergaenzlieferung D-A-CH Referenzwerte für die Nährstoffzufuhr [Reference Values for Nutrient Intake]
  4. WHO, 2015, Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children
  5. FAO, 2003, Food energy–methods of analysis and conversion factors, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 29-29, 55
  6. E. Benedik, 2012, New recommendations for vitamin D intake Nova priporočila za vnos vitamina D, Zdrav Vestn, 82, 154

Cited by

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Jakše, B., Jakše, B., Mis, N. F., Jug, B., Šajber, D., Godnov, U., & Čuk, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
  • Ljubljana University Medical Centre (SI)
  • University of Primorska (SI)
Corresponding author
  • Jakše, Boštjan
  • Mis, Nataša Fidler
Venue
Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-01-12
Volume
2021
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 2090-0724 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-0732
OpenAlex
W3121009498
Cited by
21
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
nutritional status, cardiovascular health, adolescent female athletes, artistic gymnasts, swimmers, body composition, dietary intake, micronutrient deficiency, vitamin D, serum lipids, blood pressure, cardiovascular risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.