Cited by 103Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageBIM and Construction Integration

Digital Twin Technology for Bridge Maintenance using 3D Laser Scanning: A Review

Open access
Hosamo, Haidar Hosamo, Hosamo, Mohsen Hosamo·2022·Advances in Civil Engineering

Abstract

There has been a significant surge in the interest in adopting cutting‐edge new technologies in the civil engineering industry in recent times that monitor the Internet of Things (IoT) data and control automation systems. By combining the real and digital worlds, digital technologies, such as Digital Twin, provide a high‐level depiction of bridges and their assets. The inspection, evaluation, and management of infrastructure have experienced profound changes in technological advancement over the last decade. Technologies like laser scanners have emerged as a viable replacement for labor‐intensive, costly, and dangerous traditional methods that risk health and safety. The new maintenance techniques have increased their use in the construction section, particularly regarding bridges. This review paper aims to present a comprehensive and state‐of‐the‐art review upon using laser scanners in bridge maintenance and engineering and looking deeper into the study field in focus and researchers’ suggestions in this field. Moreover, the review was conducted to gather, evaluate, and analyze the papers collected in the years from 2017 to 2022. The interaction of research networks, dominant subfields, the co‐occurrence of keywords, and countries were all examined. Four main categories were presented, namely machine learning, bridge management system (BMS), bridge information modeling (BrIM), and 3D modeling. The findings demonstrate that information standardization is the first significant obstacle to be addressed before the construction sector can benefit from the usage of Digital Twin. As a result, this article proposes a conceptual framework for building management using Digital Twins as a starting point for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2022/2194949

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hosamo, H. H., & Hosamo, M. H.
Affiliations
University of Agder (NO)
Corresponding author
Hosamo, Haidar Hosamo
Venue
Advances in Civil Engineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01
Volume
2022
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1687-8086 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-8094
OpenAlex
W4285389446
Cited by
103
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 2
FWCI
9.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Civil Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
Keywords
digital twin, bridge maintenance, 3D laser scanning, bridge inspection, bridge management systems, bridge information modeling, 3D modeling, machine learning, infrastructure asset management, Internet of Things, conceptual framework, data standardization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review