Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cell-Type-Specific Responses to Chemotherapeutics in Breast Cancer

Open access
Troester, Melissa A., Hoadley, Katherine A., Sørlie, Therese, Herbert, Brittney-Shea, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Lønning, Per Eystein, Shay, Jerry W., Kaufmann, William K., Perou, Charles M.·2004·Cancer Research

Abstract

Recent microarray studies have identified distinct subtypes of breast tumors that arise from different cell types and that show statistically significant differences in patient outcome. To gain insight into these differences, we identified in vitro and in vivo changes in gene expression induced by chemotherapeutics. We treated two cell lines derived from basal epithelium (immortalized human mammary epithelial cells) and two lines derived from luminal epithelium (MCF-7 and ZR-75–1) with chemotherapeutics used in the treatment of breast cancer and assayed for changes in gene expression using DNA microarrays. Treatment doses for doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil were selected to cause comparable cytotoxicity across all four cell lines. The dominant expression response in each of the cell lines was a general stress response; however, distinct expression patterns were observed. Both cell types induced DNA damage-response genes such as p21waf1, but the response in the luminal cells showed higher fold changes and included more p53-regulated genes. Luminal cell lines repressed a large number of cell cycle-regulated genes and other genes involved in cellular proliferation, whereas the basal cell lines did not. Instead, the basal cell lines repressed genes that were involved in differentiation. These in vitro responses were compared with expression responses in breast tumors sampled before and after treatment with doxorubicin or 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C. The in vivo data corroborated the cell-type-specific responses to chemotherapeutics observed in vitro, including the induction of p21waf1. Similarities between in vivo and in vitro responses help to identify important response mechanisms to chemotherapeutics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0107

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Troester, M. A., Hoadley, K. A., Sørlie, T., Herbert, B.-S., Børresen-Dale, A.-L., Lønning, P. E., Shay, J. W., Kaufmann, W. K., & Perou, C. M.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2004-06-15
Volume
64
Issue
12
Pages
4218-4226
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2146973482
Cited by
179
References
5
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell-Type-Specific Responses to Chemotherapeutics in Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0107
The paper
Troester, M. A., Hoadley, K. A., Sørlie, T., Herbert, B.-S., Børresen-Dale, A.-L., Lønning, P. E., Shay, J. W., Kaufmann, W. K., & Perou, C. M. (2004). Cell-Type-Specific Responses to Chemotherapeutics in Breast Cancer. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.