The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gene Expression Analysis of Preinvasive and Invasive Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinomas Identifies HOXC10 as a Key Mediator of Invasion
Abstract
If left untreated, a subset of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) of the cervix will progress to invasive squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). To identify genes whose differential expression is linked to cervical cancer progression, we compared gene expression in microdissected squamous epithelial samples from 10 normal cervices, 7 HSILs, and 21 SCCs using high-density oligonucleotide microarrays. We identified 171 distinct genes at least 1.5-fold up-regulated (and P < 0.001) in the SCCs relative to HSILs and normal cervix samples. Differential expression of a subset of these genes was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and immunohistochemical staining of cervical tissue samples. One of the genes up-regulated during progression, HOXC10, was selected for functional studies aimed at assessing its role in mediating invasive behavior of neoplastic squamous epithelial cells. Elevated HOXC10 expression was associated with increased invasiveness of human papillomavirus–immortalized keratinocytes and cervical cancer–derived cell lines in both in vitro and in vivo assays. Cervical cancer cells with high endogenous levels of HOXC10 were less invasive after short hairpin RNA–mediated knockdown of HOXC10 expression. Our findings support a key role for the HOXC10 homeobox protein in cervical cancer progression. Other genes with differential expression in invasive SCC versus HSIL may contribute to tumor progression or may be useful as markers for cancer diagnosis or progression risk. [Cancer Res 2007;67(21):10163–72]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Hox genes and their roles in oncogenesis
Shah, N., & Sukumar, S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2826 · Cited by 835
Lokman, N. A., Elder, A. S. F., Ricciardelli, C., & Oehler, M. K. (2012) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms13089959 · Cited by 358
den Boon, J. A., Pyeon, D., Wang, S. S., Horswill, M., Schiffman, M., Sherman, M., Zuna, R. E., Wang, Z., Hewitt, S. M., Pearson, R., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1509322112 · Cited by 291
Tumor suppressor p16 INK4A is necessary for survival of cervical carcinoma cell lines
McLaughlin-Drubin, M. E., Park, D., & Munger, K. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1310432110 · Cited by 163
USP15-dependent lysosomal pathway controls p53-R175H turnover in ovarian cancer cells
Padmanabhan, A., Candelaria, N., Wong, K.-K., Nikolai, B. C., Lonard, D. M., O’Malley, B. W., & Richards, J. S. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03599-w · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhai, Y., Kuick, R., Nan, B., Ota, I., Weiss, S. J., Trimble, C. L., Fearon, E. R., & Cho, K. R.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2007-11-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 10163-10172
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W2013700000
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene Expression Analysis of Preinvasive and Invasive Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinomas Identifies HOXC10 as a Key Mediator of Invasion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-2056
- The paper
- Zhai, Y., Kuick, R., Nan, B., Ota, I., Weiss, S. J., Trimble, C. L., Fearon, E. R., & Cho, K. R. (2007). Gene Expression Analysis of Preinvasive and Invasive Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinomas Identifies HOXC10 as a Key Mediator of Invasion. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-2056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.