Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrated Profiling of Basal and Luminal Breast Cancers

Adélaïde, José, Finetti, Pascal, Bekhouche, Ismahane, Repellini, Laetitia, Geneix, Jeannine, Sircoulomb, Fabrice, Charafe-Jauffret, Emmanuelle, Cervera, Nathalie, Desplans, Jérôme, Parzy, Daniel, Schoenmakers, Eric, Viens, Patrice, Jacquemier, Jocelyne, Birnbaum, Daniel, Bertucci, François, Chaffanet, Max·2007·Cancer Research

Abstract

Basal and luminal are two molecular subtypes of breast cancer with opposite histoclinical features. We report a combined, high-resolution analysis of genome copy number and gene expression in primary basal and luminal breast cancers. First, we identified and compared genomic alterations in 45 basal and 48 luminal tumors by using 244K oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). We found various genome gains and losses and rare high-level gene amplifications that may provide therapeutic targets. We show that gain of 10p is a new alteration in basal breast cancer and that a subregion of the 8p12 amplification is specific of luminal tumors. Rare high-level amplifications contained BCL2L2, CCNE, EGFR, FGFR2, IGF1R, NOTCH2, and PIK3CA. Potential gene breaks involved ETV6 and FLT3. Second, we analyzed both aCGH and gene expression profiles for 42 basal and 32 luminal breast cancers. The results support the existence of specific oncogenic pathways in basal and luminal breast cancers, involving several potential oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (TSG). In basal tumors, 73 candidate oncogenes were identified in chromosome regions 1q21-23, 10p14, and 12p13 and 28 candidate TSG in regions 4q32-34 and 5q11-23. In luminal breast cancers, 33 potential oncogenes were identified in 1q21-23, 8p12-q21, 11q13, and 16p12-13 and 61 candidate TSG in 16q12-13, 16q22-24, and 17p13. HORMAD1 (P = 6.5 × 10−5) and ZNF703 (P = 7 × 10−4) were the most significant basal and luminal potential oncogenes, respectively. Finally, among 10p candidate oncogenes associated with basal subtype, we validated CDC123/C10orf7 protein as a basal marker. [Cancer Res 2007;67(24):11565–75]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-2536

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Adélaïde, J., Finetti, P., Bekhouche, I., Repellini, L., Geneix, J., Sircoulomb, F., Charafe-Jauffret, E., Cervera, N., Desplans, J., Parzy, D., Schoenmakers, E., Viens, P., Jacquemier, J., Birnbaum, D., Bertucci, F., & Chaffanet, M.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2007-12-15
Volume
67
Issue
24
Pages
11565-11575
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W1968154499
Cited by
297
References
48
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated Profiling of Basal and Luminal Breast Cancers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-2536
The paper
Adélaïde, J., Finetti, P., Bekhouche, I., Repellini, L., Geneix, J., Sircoulomb, F., Charafe-Jauffret, E., Cervera, N., Desplans, J., Parzy, D., Schoenmakers, E., Viens, P., Jacquemier, J., Birnbaum, D., Bertucci, F., & Chaffanet, M. (2007). Integrated Profiling of Basal and Luminal Breast Cancers. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-2536

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.