Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modeling Genomic Diversity and Tumor Dependency in Malignant Melanoma

Open access
Lin, William M., Baker, Alissa C., Beroukhim, Rameen, Winckler, Wendy, Feng, Whei, Marmion, Jennifer M., Laine, Elisabeth, Greulich, Heidi, Tseng, Hsiuyi, Gates, Casey, Hodi, F. Stephen, Dranoff, Glenn, Sellers, William R., Thomas, Roman K., Meyerson, Matthew, Golub, Todd R., Dummer, Reinhard, Herlyn, Meenhard, Getz, Gad, Garraway, Levi A.·2008·Cancer Research

Abstract

The classification of human tumors based on molecular criteria offers tremendous clinical potential; however, discerning critical and “druggable” effectors on a large scale will also require robust experimental models reflective of tumor genomic diversity. Here, we describe a comprehensive genomic analysis of 101 melanoma short-term cultures and cell lines. Using an analytic approach designed to enrich for putative “driver” events, we show that cultured melanoma cells encompass the spectrum of significant genomic alterations present in primary tumors. When annotated according to these lesions, melanomas cluster into subgroups suggestive of distinct oncogenic mechanisms. Integrating gene expression data suggests novel candidate effector genes linked to recurrent copy gains and losses, including both phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN)–dependent and PTEN-independent tumor suppressor mechanisms associated with chromosome 10 deletions. Finally, sample-matched pharmacologic data show that FGFR1 mutations and extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) activation may modulate sensitivity to mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase inhibitors. Genetically defined cell culture collections therefore offer a rich framework for systematic functional studies in melanoma and other tumors. [Cancer Res 2008;68(3):664–73]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-2615

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Lin, W. M., Baker, A. C., Beroukhim, R., Winckler, W., Feng, W., Marmion, J. M., Laine, E., Greulich, H., Tseng, H., Gates, C., Hodi, F. S., Dranoff, G., Sellers, W. R., Thomas, R. K., Meyerson, M., Golub, T. R., Dummer, R., Herlyn, M., Getz, G., & Garraway, L. A.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2008-02-01
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
664-673
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2110466396
Cited by
297
References
9
FWCI
10.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling Genomic Diversity and Tumor Dependency in Malignant Melanoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-2615
The paper
Lin, W. M., Baker, A. C., Beroukhim, R., Winckler, W., Feng, W., Marmion, J. M., Laine, E., Greulich, H., Tseng, H., Gates, C., Hodi, F. S., Dranoff, G., Sellers, W. R., Thomas, R. K., Meyerson, M., Golub, T. R., Dummer, R., Herlyn, M., Getz, G., & Garraway, L. A. (2008). Modeling Genomic Diversity and Tumor Dependency in Malignant Melanoma. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-2615

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.