The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Targeted Delivery of Gemcitabine to Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Using Cetuximab as a Targeting Agent
Abstract
One of the key challenges in anticancer therapy is the toxicity and poor bioavailability of the anticancer drugs. Nanotechnology can play a pivotal role by delivering drugs in a targeted fashion to the malignant cells that will reduce the systemic toxicity of the anticancer drug. In this report, we show a stepwise development of a nanoparticle-based targeted delivery system for in vitro and in vivo therapeutic application in pancreatic cancer. In the first part of the study, we have shown the fabrication and characterization of the delivery system containing gold nanoparticle as a delivery vehicle, cetuximab as a targeting agent, and gemcitabine as an anticancer drug for in vitro application. Nanoconjugate was first characterized physico-chemically. In vitro targeting efficacy, tested against three pancreatic cancer cell lines (PANC-1, AsPC-1, and MIA Paca2) with variable epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression, showed that gold uptake correlated with EGFR expression. In the second part, we showed the in vivo therapeutic efficacy of the targeted delivery system. Administration of this targeted delivery system resulted in significant inhibition of pancreatic tumor cell proliferation in vitro and orthotopic pancreatic tumor growth in vivo. Tumor progression was monitored noninvasively by measuring bioluminescence of the implanted tumor cells. Pharmacokinetic experiments along with the quantitation of gold both in vitro and in vivo further confirmed that the inhibition of tumor growth was due to targeted delivery. This strategy could be used as a generalized approach for the treatment of a variety of cancers characterized by overexpression of EGFR. [Cancer Res 2008;68(6):1970–8]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/32020 · Cited by 76
Cited by
Gold nanoparticles: opportunities and challenges in nanomedicine
Arvizo, R., Bhattacharya, R., & Mukherjee, P. (2010) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1517/17425241003777010 · Cited by 538
Self-citationSkin cancer and new treatment perspectives: A review
Simões, M. C. F., Sousa, J. J. S., & Pais, A. A. C. C. (2015) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2014.11.001 · Cited by 414
McDaid, W. J., Greene, M. K., Johnston, M. C., Pollheimer, E., Smyth, P., McLaughlin, K., Van Schaeybroeck, S., Straubinger, R. M., Longley, D. B., & Scott, C. J. (2019) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c9nr07257h · Cited by 58
Zhang, Y., Xiong, X., Huai, Y., Dey, A., Hossen, M. N., Roy, R. V., Elechalawar, C. K., Rao, G., Bhattacharya, R., & Mukherjee, P. (2019) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00262 · Cited by 53
Self-citationEl Hallal, R., Lyu, N., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules26030567 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Patra, C. R., Bhattacharya, R., Wang, E., Katarya, A., Lau, J. S., Dutta, S., Muders, M., Wang, S., Buhrow, S. A., Safgren, S. L., Yaszemski, M. J., Reid, J. M., Ames, M. M., Mukherjee, P., & Mukhopadhyay, D.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2008-03-13
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1970-1978
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W1983466982
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeted Delivery of Gemcitabine to Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Using Cetuximab as a Targeting Agent. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-6102
- The paper
- Patra, C. R., Bhattacharya, R., Wang, E., Katarya, A., Lau, J. S., Dutta, S., Muders, M., Wang, S., Buhrow, S. A., Safgren, S. L., Yaszemski, M. J., Reid, J. M., Ames, M. M., Mukherjee, P., & Mukhopadhyay, D. (2008). Targeted Delivery of Gemcitabine to Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Using Cetuximab as a Targeting Agent. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-6102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.