The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Targeted and Nontargeted Effects of Ionizing Radiation That Impact Genomic Instability
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
Radiation-induced genomic instability, in which the progeny of irradiated cells display a high frequency of nonclonal genomic damage, occurs at a frequency inconsistent with mutation. We investigated the mechanism of this nontargeted effect in human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) exposed to low doses of radiation. We identified a centrosome-associated expression signature in irradiated HMEC and show here that centrosome deregulation occurs in the first cell cycle after irradiation, is dose dependent, and that viable daughters of these cells are genomically unstable as evidenced by spontaneous DNA damage, tetraploidy, and aneuploidy. Clonal analysis of genomic instability showed a threshold of >10 cGy. Treatment with transforming growth factor beta1 (TGFbeta), which is implicated in regulation of genomic stability and is activated by radiation, reduced both the centrosome expression signature and centrosome aberrations in irradiated HMEC. Furthermore, TGFbeta inhibition significantly increased centrosome aberration frequency, tetraploidy, and aneuploidy in nonirradiated HMEC. Rather than preventing radiation-induced or spontaneous centrosome aberrations, TGFbeta selectively deleted unstable cells via p53-dependent apoptosis. Together, these studies show that radiation deregulates centrosome stability, which underlies genomic instability in normal human epithelial cells, and that this can be opposed by radiation-induced TGFbeta signaling.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NTEs have been shown to impact initiation, promotion and progression stages of tumorigenesis at low doses of high LET radiation.
“NTE have been shown to impact initiation, promotion and progression stages of tumorigenesis at low doses of high LET radiation (Illa-Bochaca et al., 2014;Omene et al., 2020;Maxwell et al., 2008;Kadhim et al., 2013;Lorimore et al., 2003;Barcellos-Hoff and Mao, 2016;Hada et al., 2014;Nagasawa and Little, 1992;Belyakov et al., 2005;Chang et al., 2016).”
From A proposed change to astronaut exposures limits is a giant leap backwards for radiation protection (2021) · cites this paper as Maxwell et al., 2008
Citations
Cites
In Vivo Activation of the p53 Pathway by Small-Molecule Antagonists of MDM2
Vassilev, L. T., Vu, B. T., Graves, B., Carvajal, D., Podlaski, F., Filipovic, Z., Kong, N., Kammlott, U., Lukacs, C., Klein, C., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1092472 · Cited by 4,661
Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions
Gorgoulis, V. G., Vassiliou, L.-V. F., Karakaidos, P., Zacharatos, P., Kotsinas, A., Liloglou, T., Venere, M., DiTullio, R. A., Kastrinakis, N. G., Levy, B., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03485 · Cited by 2,009
Cytokinesis failure generating tetraploids promotes tumorigenesis in p53-null cells
Fujiwara, T., Bandi, M., Nitta, M., Ivanova, E. V., Bronson, R. T., & Pellman, D. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04217 · Cited by 1,067
The pathological response to DNA damage does not contribute to p53-mediated tumour suppression
Christophorou, M. A., Ringshausen, I., Finch, A. J., Swigart, L. B., & Evan, G. I. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05077 · Cited by 382
In situ analyses of genome instability in breast cancer
Chin, K., de Solorzano, C. O., Knowles, D., Jones, A., Chou, W., Rodriguez, E. G., Kuo, W.-L., Ljung, B.-M., Chew, K., Myambo, K., et al. (2004) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1409 · Cited by 361
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- Wright EG, Coates PJ. Untargeted effects of ionizing radiation: implications for radiation pathology. Mutat Res 2006; 597: 119–32. · DOI
- Kadhim MA, Macdonald DA, Goodhead DT, Lorimore SA, Marsden SJ, Wright EG. Transmission of chromosomal instability after plutonium α-particle irradiation [see comments]. Nature 1992; 355: 738–40. · DOI
- Kadhim MA, Lorimore SA, Townsend KM, Goodhead DT, Buckle VJ, Wright EG. Radiation-induced genomic instability: delayed cytogenetic aberrations and apoptosis in primary human bone marrow cells. Int J Radiat Biol 1995; 67: 287–93. · DOI
- Watson GE, Pocock DA, Papworth D, Lorimore SA, Wright EG. In vivo chromosomal instability and transmissible aberrations in the progeny of haemopoietic stem cells induced by high- and low-LET radiations. Int J Radiat Biol 2001; 77: 409–17. · DOI
- Ponnaiya B, Cornforth MN, Ullrich RL. Induction of chromosomal instability in human mammary cells by neutrons and γ rays. Radiat Res 1997; 147: 288–94. · DOI
- Ponnaiya B, Cornforth MN, Ullrich RL. Radiation-induced chromosomal instability in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice: the difference is as clear as black and white. Radiat Res 1997; 147: 121–5. · DOI
- Sudo H, Garbe J, Stampfer M, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Kronenberg A. Karyotypic instability and centrosome aberrations in the progeny of finite life-span human mammary epithelial cells exposed to sparsely or densely ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 2008; 170: 23–32. · DOI
- Little JB. Genomic instability and bystander effects: a historical perspective. Oncogene 2003; 22: 6978–87. · DOI
- Coates PJ, Lorimore SA, Wright EG. Damaging and protective cell signalling in the untargeted effects of ionizing radiation. Mutat Res 2004; 568: 5–20. · DOI
- Portess DI, Bauer G, Hill MA, O'Neill P. Low dose irradiation of non-transformed cells stimulates the selective removal of pre-cancerous cells via intercellular induction of apoptosis. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 1246–53. · DOI
- Barcellos-Hoff MH, Costes SV. A systems biology approach to multicellular and multi-generational radiation responses. Mutat Res 2006; 597: 32–8. · DOI
- Sluder G, Nordberg JJ. The good, the bad and the ugly: the practical consequences of centrosome amplification. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2004; 16: 49–54. · DOI
- Sato C, Kuriyama R, Nishizawa K. Microtubule-organizing centers abnormal in number, structure, and nucleating activity in x-irradiated mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 1983; 96: 776–82. · DOI
- Sato N, Mizumoto K, Nakamura M, Tanaka M. Radiation-induced centrosome overduplication and multiple mitotic spindles in human tumor cells. Expt Cell Res 2000; 255: 321–6. · DOI
- Zhang W, Fletcher L, Muschel RJ. The role of Polo-like kinase 1 in the inhibition of centrosome separation after ionizing radiation. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 42994–9. · DOI
- Andarawewa KL, Erickson AC, Chou WS, et al. Ionizing Radiation predisposes nonmalignant human mammary epithelial cells to undergo transforming growth factor {β} induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 8662–70. · DOI
- Fleisch MC, Maxwell CA, Kuper CK, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Costes SV. Intensity based separation allows precise quantification of clustered centrosomes in tissue sections. Microsc Res Tech 2006; 69: 964–72. · DOI
- Raman S, Maxwell CA, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Parvin B. Geometric approach to segmentation and protein localization in cell culture assays. J Microsc 2007; 225: 22–30. · DOI
- Chng WJ, Ahmann GJ, Henderson K, et al. Clinical implication of centrosome amplification in plasma cell neoplasm. Blood 2005; 107: 3669–75. · DOI
- Chng WJ, Braggio E, Mulligan G, et al. The centrosome index is a powerful prognostic marker in myeloma and identifies a cohort of patients that might benefit from aurora kinase inhibition 10.1182/blood-2007–06–097774. Blood 2008; 111: 1603–9. · DOI
- Shi Q, King RW. Chromosome nondisjunction yields tetraploid rather than aneuploid cells in human cell lines. Nature 2005; 437: 1038–42. · DOI
- Limoli CL, Kaplan MI, Corcoran J, Meyers M, Boothman DA, Morgan WF. Chromosomal instability and its relationship to other end points of genomic instability. Cancer Res 1997; 57: 5557–63.
- Lingle WL, Barrett SL, Negron VC, et al. Centrosome amplification drives chromosomal instability in breast tumor development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99: 1978–83. · DOI
- Bartkova J, Horejsi Z, Koed K, et al. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 2005; 434: 864–70. · DOI · Paper page
- Bignold LP, Coghlan BLD, Jersmann HPA. Hansemann, Boveri, chromosomes and the gametogenesis-related theories of tumours. Cell Biol Int 2006; 30: 640–4. · DOI
- Barcellos-Hoff MH. Radiation-induced transforming growth factor β and subsequent extracellular matrix reorganization in murine mammary gland. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 3880–6.
- Glick AB, Weinberg WC, Wu IH, Quan W, Yuspa SH. Transforming growth factor β 1 suppresses genomic instability independent of a G1 arrest, p53, and Rb. Cancer Res 1996; 56: 3645–50.
- Markowitz S, Wang J, Myeroff L, et al. Inactivation of the type II TGF-β receptor in colon cancer cells with microsatellite instability. Science 1995; 268: 1336–8. · DOI
- Sawyer JS, Anderson BD, Beight DW, et al. Synthesis and activity of new aryl- and heteroaryl-substituted pyrazole inhibitors of the transforming growth factor- type I receptor kinase domain. J Med Chem 2003; 46: 3953–6. · DOI
- Ouchi T. BRCA1 phosphorylation: biological consequences. Cancer Biol Ther 2006; 5: 470–5. · DOI
- Ewan KB, Henshall-Powell RL, Ravani SA, et al. Transforming growth factor-β1 mediates cellular response to DNA damage in situ. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 5627–31.
- Kirshner J, Jobling MF, Pajares MJ, et al. Inhibition of TGFβ1 signaling attenuates ATM activity in response to genotoxic stress. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 10861–8. · DOI
- Cordenonsi M, Dupont S, Maretto S, Insinga A, Imbriano C, Piccolo S. Links between tumor suppressors: p53 is required for TGF-β gene responses by cooperating with Smads. Cell 2003; 113: 301–14. · DOI
- Takebayashi-Suzuki K, Funami J, Tokumori D, et al. Interplay between the tumor suppressor p53 and TGF{β} signaling shapes embryonic body axes in Xenopus. Development 2003; 130: 3929–39. · DOI
- Zhang S, Ekman M, Thakur N, et al. TGFβ1-induced activation of atm and p53 mediates apoptosis in a smad7-dependent manner. Cell Cycle 2006; 5: 2787–95. · DOI
- D'Assoro AB, Busby R, Suino K, et al. Genotoxic stress leads to centrosome amplification in breast cancer cell lines that have an inactive G1/S cell cycle checkpoint. Oncogene 2004; 23: 4068–75. · DOI
- Morgan WF. non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: II. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vivo, clastogenic factors and transgenerational effects. Radiat Res 2003; 159: 581–96. · DOI
- Scott BR. A biological-based model that links genomic instability, bystander effects, and adaptive response. Mutat Res 2004; 568: 129–43. · DOI
- Tang B, Vu M, Booker T, et al. TGF-β switches from tumor suppressor to prometastatic factor in a model of breast cancer progression. J Clin Invest 2003; 112: 1116–24. · DOI
- Zavadil J, Bottinger EP. TGF-β and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions. Oncogene 2005; 24: 5764–74. · DOI
- Park CC, Henshall-Powell R, Erickson AC, et al. Ionizing radiation induces heritable disruption of epithelial cell-microenvironment interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 10728–33. · DOI
- Quinn CM, Kagedal K, Terman A, Stroikin U, Brunk UT, Jessup W. Induction of fibroblast apolipoprotein E expression during apoptosis, starvation-induced growth arrest and mitosis. Biochem J 2004; 378: 753–61. · DOI · Paper page
- Kadaja-Saarepuu L, Laos S, Jaager K, et al. CD43 promotes cell growth and helps to evade FAS-mediated apoptosis in non-hematopoietic cancer cells lacking the tumor suppressors p53 or ARF. Oncogene 2007; 27: 1705–15. · DOI
- Jain A, Tindell CA, Laux I, et al. Epithelial membrane protein-1 is a biomarker of gefitinib resistance 10.1073/pnas.0502113102. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102: 11858–63. · DOI
- Chen LY, Chen JD. Daxx silencing sensitizes cells to multiple apoptotic pathways. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23: 7108–21. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A proposed change to astronaut exposures limits is a giant leap backwards for radiation protection
Cucinotta, F. A., Schimmerling, W., Blakely, E. A., & Hei, T. K. (2021) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2021.07.005 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Maxwell, C. A., Fleisch, M. C., Costes, S. V., Erickson, A. C., Boissière, A., Gupta, R., Ravani, S. A., Parvin, B., & Barcellos-Hoff, M. H.
- Affiliations
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2008-10-15
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 8304-8311
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W2124203681
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Keywords
- radiation-induced genomic instability, TGF-β1, human mammary epithelial cells, tetraploidy, aneuploidy, spontaneous DNA damage, p53-dependent apoptosis, low-dose radiation, clonal analysis, cell cycle
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Breast, Cells, Cultured, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Epithelial Cells, Female, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, Signal Transduction, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Apoptosis, Centrosome, Genomic Instability, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review