The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptive Therapy
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
A number of successful systemic therapies are available for treatment of disseminated cancers. However, tumor response is often transient, and therapy frequently fails due to emergence of resistant populations. The latter reflects the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment as well as the evolutionary capacity of cancer phenotypes to adapt to therapeutic perturbations. Although cancers are highly dynamic systems, cancer therapy is typically administered according to a fixed, linear protocol. Here we examine an adaptive therapeutic approach that evolves in response to the temporal and spatial variability of tumor microenvironment and cellular phenotype as well as therapy-induced perturbations. Initial mathematical models find that when resistant phenotypes arise in the untreated tumor, they are typically present in small numbers because they are less fit than the sensitive population. This reflects the “cost” of phenotypic resistance such as additional substrate and energy used to up-regulate xenobiotic metabolism, and therefore not available for proliferation, or the growth inhibitory nature of environments (i.e., ischemia or hypoxia) that confer resistance on phenotypically sensitive cells. Thus, in the Darwinian environment of a cancer, the fitter chemosensitive cells will ordinarily proliferate at the expense of the less fit chemoresistant cells. The models show that, if resistant populations are present before administration of therapy, treatments designed to kill maximum numbers of cancer cells remove this inhibitory effect and actually promote more rapid growth of the resistant populations. We present an alternative approach in which treatment is continuously modulated to achieve a fixed tumor population. The goal of adaptive therapy is to enforce a stable tumor burden by permitting a significant population of chemosensitive cells to survive so that they, in turn, suppress proliferation of the less fit but chemoresistant subpopulations. Computer simulations show that this strategy can result in prolonged survival that is substantially greater than that of high dose density or metronomic therapies. The feasibility of adaptive therapy is supported by in vivo experiments. [Cancer Res 2009;69(11):4894–903] Major Findings We present mathematical analysis of the evolutionary dynamics of tumor populations with and without therapy. Analytic solutions and numerical simulations show that, with pretreatment, therapy-resistant cancer subpopulations are present due to phenotypic or microenvironmental factors; maximum dose density chemotherapy hastens rapid expansion of resistant populations. The models predict that host survival can be maximized if “treatment-for-cure strategy” is replaced by “treatment-for-stability.” Specifically, the models predict that an optimal treatment strategy will modulate therapy to maintain a stable population of chemosensitive cells that can, in turn, suppress the growth of resistant populations under normal tumor conditions (i.e., when therapy-induced toxicity is absent). In vivo experiments using OVCAR xenografts treated with carboplatin show that adaptive therapy is feasible and, in this system, can produce long-term survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tong, R. T., Boucher, Y., Kozin, S. V., Winkler, F., Hicklin, D. J., & Jain, R. K. (2004) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0074 · Cited by 1,189
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Frei E, Canellos GP. Dose, a critical factor in cancer chemotherapy. Am J Med 1980; 69: 585–95. · DOI · Paper page
- Frei E, Elias A, Wheeler C, et al. The relationship between high-dose treatment and combination chemotherapy. The concept of summation dose intensity. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 314: 1423–31.
- Longley DB, Johnston PG. Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance. J Pathol 2005; 205: 275–92. · DOI · Paper page
- Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Morales-Vasquez F, Hortobagyi GN. Overview of resistance to systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 2007; 608: 1–22. · DOI · Paper page
- Zhou SF. Structure, function and regulation of P-glycoprotein and its clinical relevance in drug disposition. Xenobiotica 2008; 38: 802–32. · DOI · Paper page
- Ma JJ, Chen BL, Xin XY. Inhibition of multi-drug resistance of ovarian carcinoma by small interfering RNA targeting to MRP2 gene. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008. · DOI
- Rajkumar T, Yamuna M. Multiple pathways are involved in drug resistance to doxorubicin in an osteosarcoma cell line. Anticancer Drugs 2008; 19: 257–65. · DOI
- Hazlehurst LA, Enkemann SA, Beam CA, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic comparisons of de novo and acquired melphalan resistance in an isogenic multiple myeloma cell line model. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 7900–6.
- Shackney SE, McCormack GW, Guchural GJ. Growth rate patterns of solid tumors and their relationship to responsiveness to therapy. An analytical review. Ann Intern Med 1978; 89: 107–9. · DOI
- Kansal AR, Torquato S, Chiocca EA, Deisboeck TS. Emergence of a subpopulation in a computational model of tumor growth. J Theor Biol 2000; 207: 431–41. · DOI
- Marignol L, Coffey M, Lawler M, Hollywood D. Hypoxia in prostate cancer: a powerful shield against tumour destruction. Cancer Treat Rev 2008; 34: 313–27. · DOI
- Reddy LH. Drug delivery to tumours: recent strategies. J Pharm Pharmacol 2005; 57: 1231–42. · DOI
- Shimogai R, Kigawa J, Itamochi H, et al. Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α gene affects the outcome in patients with ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18: 499–505. · DOI
- Vaupel P, Thews O, Hoeckel M. Treatment resistance of solid tumors: role of hypoxia and anemia. Med Oncol 2001; 18: 243–59. · DOI · Paper page
- Greijer AE, de Jong MC, Scheffer GL, et al. Hypoxia-induced acidification causes mitoxantrone resistance not mediated by drug transporters in human breast cancer cells. Cell Oncol 2005; 27: 43–9. · DOI
- Norton L, Simon R. Tumor size, sensitivity to therapy, and design of treatment schedules. Cancer Treat Rep 1977; 61: 1307–17.
- Norton L, Simon R. The Norton-Simon hypothesis revisited. Cancer Res Treat Rep 1986; 70: 164–6.
- Orzano JA, Swain SM. Concepts and clinical trials of dose-dense chemotherapy for breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2005; 6: 402–11. · DOI
- Aabo K, Adams M, Adnitt P, et al.; Advance Ovarian Cancer Trialists' Group. Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: four systematic meta-analyses of individual patient data from 37 randomized trials. Br J Cancer 2001; 78: 1479–87. · DOI
- Vasey PA, Paul J, Birt A, et al.; Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group. Docataxel and cisplatin in combination as first-line chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 2069–80. · DOI
- McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MS, et al. An assessment of dose-intensive therapy in suboptimally debulked ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2113–9.
- Kaye SB, Vasey PA. Docatexel in ovarian cancer: phase III perspectives and future development. Semin Oncol 2002; 29: 22–7. · DOI
- Gately S, Kerbel R. Antiangiogenic scheduling of lower dose cancer chemotherapy. Cancer J 2001; 7: 427–36.
- Bocci G, Falcone A, Fioravanti A, et al. Antiangiogenic and anticolorectal cancer effects of metronomic irinotecan chemotherapy alone and in combination with semaxinib. Br J Cancer 2008; 98: 1619–29. · DOI
- Kanamaru H, Muranaka K, Mori H, Akino H, Arai Y, Okada K. Analysis of histological heterogeneity in renal cell carcinoma: tumor size-related histological change and its prognostic significance. Int J Urol 1996; 3: 256–60. · DOI
- Campbell LL, Polyak K. Breast tumor heterogeneity: cancer stem cells or clonal evolution. Cell Cycle 2007; 19: 2332–8. · DOI · Paper page
- Gatenby RA, Frieden BR. Inducing catastrophe in malignant growth. Math Med Biol 2008; 25: 267–83. · DOI
- Gatenby RA, Frieden BR. Application of information theory and extreme physical information to carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 3675–84.
- Sevick EM, Jain RK. Geometric resistance to blood flow in solid tumors perfused ex vivo: effects of tumor size and perfusion pressure. Cancer Res 1989; 49: 3506–12.
- Milross CG, Tucker SL, Mason KA, et al. The effect of tumor size on necrosis and polarographically measure pO2. Acta Oncol 1997; 36: 183–9. · DOI
Cited by
Greaves, M., & Maley, C. C. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10762 · Cited by 3,162
Clonal heterogeneity and tumor evolution: past, present, and the future
McGranahan, N., & Swanton, C. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.018 · Cited by 2,840
Biological and therapeutic impact of intratumor heterogeneity in cancer evolution
McGranahan, N., & Swanton, C. (2015) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2014.12.001 · Cited by 1,077
Intratumor Heterogeneity: Evolution through Space and Time
Swanton, C. (2012) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-2217 · Cited by 931
From tumour heterogeneity to advances in precision treatment of colorectal cancer
Punt, C. J. A., Koopman, M., & Vermeulen, L. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.171 · Cited by 654
Metadata
- Authors
- Gatenby, R. A., Silva, A. S., Gillies, R. J., & Frieden, B. R.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2009-06-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4894-4903
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W4251104453
- Cited by
- 846
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.