Cited by 931Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchCancer Cells and Metastasis

Intratumor Heterogeneity: Evolution through Space and Time

Open access
Swanton, Charles·2012·Cancer Research

Abstract

Recent technologic advances have permitted higher resolution and more rapid analysis of individual cancer genomes at the single-nucleotide level. Such advances have shown bewildering intertumor heterogeneity with limited somatic alterations shared between tumors of the same histopathologic subtype. Exacerbating such complexity, increasing evidence of intratumor genetic heterogeneity (ITH) is emerging, both within individual tumor biopsies and spatially separated between biopsies of the same tumor. Sequential analysis of tumors has also revealed evidence that ITH temporally evolves during the disease course. ITH has implications for predictive or prognostic biomarker strategies, where the tumor subclone that may ultimately influence therapeutic outcome may evade detection because of its absence or presence at low frequency at diagnosis or because of its regional separation from the tumor biopsy site. In this review, the implications of “trunk and branch” tumor evolution for drug discovery approaches and emerging evidence that low-frequency somatic events may drive tumor growth through paracrine signaling fostering a tumor ecologic niche are discussed. The concept of an “actionable mutation” is considered within a model of clonal dominance and heterogeneous tumor cell dependencies. Evidence that cancer therapeutics may augment ITH and the need to track the tumor subclonal architecture through treatment are defined as key research areas. Finally, if combination therapeutic approaches to limit the consequences of ITH prove challenging, identification of drivers or suppressors of ITH may provide attractive therapeutic targets to limit tumor evolutionary rates and adaptation. Cancer Res; 72(19); 4875–82. ©2012 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-2217

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reproducibility of a tumor explant becomes an issue since a tumor is highly heterogeneous and varies between patients, between different tumors, or within the same tumor inside an individual patient.

    “Conversely, the reproducibility of a tumor also becomes an issue since a tumor is highly heterogeneous and varies not only between patients but also between different tumors or even within the same tumor inside an individual patient [38].”

    From Microfluidic modelling of the tumor microenvironment for anti-cancer drug development (2019) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Abstract describes heterogeneity between tumours and within individual tumours, and “Clinical Implications of ITH > A. Tumour Sampling Bias” explains how variation between sampled sites can complicate biomarker validation. The paper does not specifically address the reproducibility of tumour explants, so that application goes beyond what our copy establishes. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swanton, C.
Affiliations
Cancer Research UK (GB)
Corresponding author
Swanton, Charles
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2012-09-30
Volume
72
Issue
19
Pages
4875-4882
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2139790154
Cited by
931
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
intratumoral heterogeneity, tumor evolution, clonal evolution, tumor subclones, somatic mutations, actionable mutations, clonal dominance, tumor microenvironment, paracrine signaling, drug resistance, predictive biomarkers, combination therapy, cancer genomics
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Chromosome Aberrations, Humans, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Neoplasms, Time Factors, Genetic Heterogeneity, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review