The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Affinity and Antigen Internalization on the Uptake and Penetration of Anti-HER2 Antibodies in Solid Tumors
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Antibody drugs are widely used in cancer therapy, but conditions to maximize tumor penetration and efficacy have yet to be fully elucidated. In this study, we investigated the impact of antibody binding affinity on tumor targeting and penetration with affinity variants that recognize the same epitope. Specifically, we compared four derivatives of the C6.5 monoclonal antibody (mAb), which recognizes the same HER2 epitope (monovalent KD values ranging from 270 to 0.56 nmol/L). Moderate affinity was associated with the highest tumor accumulation at 24 and 120 hours after intravenous injection, whereas high affinity was found to produce the lowest tumor accumulation. Highest affinity mAbs were confined to the perivascular space of tumors with an average penetration of 20.4 ± 7.5 μm from tumor blood vessels. Conversely, lowest affinity mAbs exhibited a broader distribution pattern with an average penetration of 84.8 ± 12.8 μm. In vitro internalization assays revealed that antibody internalization and catabolism generally increased with affinity, plateauing once the rate of HER2 internalization exceeded the rate of antibody dissociation. Effects of internalization and catabolism on tumor targeting were further examined using antibodies of moderate (C6.5) or high-affinity (trastuzumab), labeled with residualizing (111In-labeled) or nonresidualizing (125I-labeled) radioisotopes. Significant amounts of antibody of both affinities were degraded by tumors in vivo. Furthermore, moderate- to high-affinity mAbs targeting the same HER2 epitope with monovalent affinity above 23 nmol/L had equal tumor accumulation of residualizing radiolabel over 120 hours. Results indicated equal tumor exposure, suggesting that mAb penetration and retention in tumors reflected affinity-based differences in tumor catabolism. Together, these results suggest that high-density, rapidly internalizing antigens subject high-affinity antibodies to greater internalization and degradation, thereby limiting their penetration of tumors. In contrast, lower-affinity antibodies penetrate tumors more effectively when rates of antibody–antigen dissociation are higher than those of antigen internalization. Together, our findings offer insights into how to optimize the ability of therapeutic antibodies to penetrate tumors. Cancer Res; 71(6); 2250–9. ©2011 AACR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, Rudnick et al. showed that when targeting high‐density and rapidly internalized antigens such as HER2, a lower‐affinity antibody could penetrate tumors more effectively, while an ultrahigh‐affinity antibody could limit the distribution of the antibody to tumor as a result of “binding site barrier.”27”
From Tutorial on monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics and its considerations in early development (2018) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antibody tumor penetration: Transport opposed by systemic and antigen-mediated clearance
Thurber, G. M., Schmidt, M. M., & Wittrup, K. D. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2008.04.012 · Cited by 642
Adams, G. P., Schier, R., McCall, A. M., Simmons, H. H., Horak, E. M., Alpaugh, R. K., Marks, J. D., & Weiner, L. M. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 623
Self-citationPhysiological barriers to delivery of monoclonal antibodies and other macromolecules in tumors.
Jain, R. K. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 574
Austin, C. D., Mazière, A. M. G. L. D., Pisacane, P. I., van Dijk, S., Eigenbrot, C. W., Sliwkowski, M. X., Klumperman, J., & Scheller, R. H. (2004) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e04-07-0591 · Cited by 507
Schier, R., McCall, A. M., Adams, G. P., Marshall, K. W., Merritt, H., Yim, M., Crawford, R. S., Weiner, L. M., Marks, C. B., & Marks, J. D. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0598 · Cited by 382
Self-citationA modeling analysis of monoclonal antibody percolation through tumors: a binding-site barrier.
Fujimori, K., Covell, D. G., Fletcher, J. E., & Weinstein, J. N. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 356
Schier, R., Bye, J. M., Apell, G., McCall, A. M., Adams, G. P., Malmqvist, M., Weiner, L. M., & Marks, J. D. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0004 · Cited by 291
Self-citationFujimori, K., Covell, D. G., Fletcher, J. E., & Weinstein, J. N. (1989) · PubMed · Cited by 258
Zahnd, C., Kawe, M., Stumpp, M. T., de Pasquale, C., Tamaskovic, R., Nagy‐Davidescu, G., Dreier, B., Schibli, R., Binz, H. K., Waibel, R., et al. (2010) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-2724 · Cited by 245
Affinity and Avidity in Antibody-Based Tumor Targeting
Rudnick, S. I., & Adams, G. P. (2009) · Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals · doi:10.1089/cbr.2009.0627 · Cited by 237
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Adams, 1992, Comparison of the pharmacokinetics in mice and the biological-activity of murine L6 and human-mouse chimeric Ch-L6 antibody, Antib Immunoconjug Radiopharm, 5, 81
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities
Shi, J., Kantoff, P. W., Wooster, R., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.108 · Cited by 5,873
Antibody–Drug Conjugates: An Emerging Concept in Cancer Therapy
Chari, R. V. J., Miller, M. L., & Widdison, W. C. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201307628 · Cited by 930
Antibody-drug conjugates: recent advances in conjugation and linker chemistries
Tsuchikama, K., & An, Z. (2016) · Protein & Cell · doi:10.1007/s13238-016-0323-0 · Cited by 798
Srinivasarao, M., & Low, P. S. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00013 · Cited by 624
Designed Ankyrin Repeat Proteins (DARPins): Binding Proteins for Research, Diagnostics, and Therapy
Plückthun, A. (2011) · The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010611-134654 · Cited by 572
Antibody–drug conjugates as novel anti-cancer chemotherapeutics
Peters, C., & Brown, S. (2015) · Bioscience Reports · doi:10.1042/bsr20150089 · Cited by 509
ImmunoPET: Concept, Design, and Applications
Wei, W., Rosenkrans, Z. T., Liu, J., Huang, G., Luo, Q., & Cai, W. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00738 · Cited by 504
Nakada, T., Sugihara, K., Jikoh, T., Abe, Y., & Agatsuma, T. (2019) · Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin · doi:10.1248/cpb.c18-00744 · Cited by 450
Pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies and Fc-fusion proteins
Liming, L. (2017) · Protein & Cell · doi:10.1007/s13238-017-0408-4 · Cited by 407
Advancement and applications of peptide phage display technology in biomedical science
Wu, C., Liu, I.-J., Lu, R., & Wu, H. (2016) · Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.1186/s12929-016-0223-x · Cited by 362
Ritchie, M. F., Tchistiakova, L., & Scott, N. (2013) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.22854 · Cited by 324
Tutorial on monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics and its considerations in early development
Ovacik, M., & Lin, K. (2018) · Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1111/cts.12567 · Cited by 299
Bridging Disulfides for Stable and Defined Antibody Drug Conjugates
Badescu, G. O., Bryant, P., Bird, M., Henseleit, K. D., Swierkosz, J., Parekh, V., Tommasi, R., Pawlisz, E., Jurlewicz, K., Farys, M., et al. (2014) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/bc500148x · Cited by 292
Linkers Having a Crucial Role in Antibody–Drug Conjugates
Lu, J. G., Jiang, F., Lü, A., & Zhang, G. (2016) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms17040561 · Cited by 298
Targeted drug delivery for cancer therapy: the other side of antibodies
Firer, M. A., & Gellerman, G. (2012) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/1756-8722-5-70 · Cited by 271
DARPins and other repeat protein scaffolds: advances in engineering and applications
Boersma, Y. L., & Plückthun, A. (2011) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2011.06.004 · Cited by 239
Antibody–Drug Conjugates—A Tutorial Review
Baah, S., Laws, M., & Rahman, K. M. (2021) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules26102943 · Cited by 254
Combinatorial Peptide Libraries: Mining for Cell-Binding Peptides
Gray, B. P., & Brown, K. C. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400166n · Cited by 233
Breij, E. C. W., de Goeij, B. E. C. G., Verploegen, S., Schuurhuis, D. H., Amirkhosravi, A., Francis, J., Miller, V. B., Houtkamp, M., Bleeker, W. K., Satijn, D., et al. (2014) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-2440 · Cited by 227
Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Cancer Therapy: Chemistry to Clinical Implications
Dan, N., Setua, S., Kashyap, V. K., Khan, S., Jaggi, M., Yallapu, M. M., & Chauhan, S. C. (2018) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph11020032 · Cited by 222
Tubulin Inhibitor-Based Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Cancer Therapy
Chen, H., Lin, Z., Arnst, K. E., Miller, D. D., & Li, W. (2017) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules22081281 · Cited by 221
Tibbitts, J., Canter, D., Graff, R., Smith, A. M., & Khawli, L. A. (2015) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2015.1115937 · Cited by 219
Xiang, D., Zheng, C., Zhou, S., Qiao, S., Tran, P. H. L., Pu, C., Li, Y., Kong, L., Kouzani, A. Z., Lin, J., et al. (2015) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.11711 · Cited by 215
Aptamer-functionalized liposomes for targeted cancer therapy
Moosavian, S. A., & Sahebkar, A. (2019) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2019.01.045 · Cited by 201
Ligand-targeted theranostic nanomedicines against cancer
Yao, V. J., D’Angelo, S., Butler, K. S., Théron, C., Smith, T. L., Marchiò, S., Gelovani, J. G., Sidman, R. L., Dobroff, A. S., Brinker, C. J., et al. (2016) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.01.002 · Cited by 200
Size and affinity kinetics of nanobodies influence targeting and penetration of solid tumours
Debie, P., Lafont, C., Defrise, M., Hansen, I., van Willigen, D. M., van Leeuwen, F. W. B., Gijsbers, R., D’Huyvetter, M., Devoogdt, N., Lahoutte, T., et al. (2019) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.11.014 · Cited by 195
Ulaner, G. A., Hyman, D. M., Ross, D. S., Corben, A. D., Chandarlapaty, S., Goldfarb, S. B., McArthur, H. L., Erinjeri, J. P., Solomon, S. B., Kolb, H. C., et al. (2016) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.115.172031 · Cited by 198
Casi, G., & Neri, D. (2015) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00457 · Cited by 193
Nanotechnology-based intelligent drug design for cancer metastasis treatment
Gao, Y., Xie, J., Chen, H., Gu, S., Zhao, R., Shao, J., & Jia, L. (2013) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.10.013 · Cited by 188
Antibody–Drug Conjugates: A Review of Approved Drugs and Their Clinical Level of Evidence
Gogia, P., Ashraf, H., Bhasin, S., & Xu, Y. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15153886 · Cited by 198
Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Possibilities and Challenges.
Nejadmoghaddam, M.-R., Minai‐Tehrani, A., Ghahremanzadeh, R., Mahmoudi, M., Dinarvand, R., & Zarnani, A. (2019) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 182
Practical Theoretic Guidance for the Design of Tumor-Targeting Agents
Wittrup, K. D., Thurber, G. M., Schmidt, M. M., & Rhoden, J. J. (2012) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-396962-0.00010-0 · Cited by 172
Doxorubicin loaded magnetic gold nanoparticles for in vivo targeted drug delivery
Elbialy, N. S., Fathy, M. M., & Khalil, W. M. (2015) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.05.032 · Cited by 172
Xu, Z., Guo, D., Jiang, Z., Tong, R., Jiang, P., Bai, L., Chen, L., Zhu, Y., Guo, C. H., Shi, J., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111682 · Cited by 169
Resistance to antibody‐drug conjugates in breast cancer: mechanisms and solutions
Chen, Y. A., Xu, Y., Shao, Z., & Yu, K. (2022) · 癌症:英文版 · doi:10.1002/cac2.12387 · Cited by 158
Small Targeted Cytotoxics: Current State and Promises from DNA‐Encoded Chemical Libraries
Krall, N., Scheuermann, J., & Neri, D. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201204631 · Cited by 148
Small Molecules for Active Targeting in Cancer
Kue, C. S., Kamkaew, A., Burgess, K., Kiew, L. V., Chung, L. Y., & Lee, H. B. (2016) · Medicinal Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/med.21387 · Cited by 148
Glypican‐3‐Specific Antibody Drug Conjugates Targeting Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Fu, Y., Urban, D. J., Nani, R. R., Zhang, Y., Li, N., Fu, H., Shah, H., Gorka, A. P., Guha, R., Chen, L., et al. (2018) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.30326 · Cited by 134
Ulaner, G. A., Hyman, D. M., Lyashchenko, S. K., Lewis, J. S., & Carrasquillo, J. A. (2017) · Clinical Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1097/rlu.0000000000001820 · Cited by 133
Nessler, I., Khera, E., Vance, S., Kopp, A., Qiu, Q., Keating, T. A., Abu-Yousif, A. O., Sandal, T., Legg, J., Thompson, L., et al. (2020) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-2295 · Cited by 128
Cilliers, C., Menezes, B., Nessler, I., Linderman, J. J., & Thurber, G. M. (2017) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-1638 · Cited by 128
Mechanisms of Apoptosis Resistance to NK Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity in Cancer
Sordo‐Bahamonde, C., Lorenzo‐Herrero, S., Páyer, Á. R., Gonzalez, S. R., & López‐Soto, A. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21103726 · Cited by 127
Cilliers, C., Guo, H., Liao, J., Christodolu, N., & Thurber, G. M. (2016) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-016-9940-z · Cited by 121
Reducing affinity as a strategy to boost immunomodulatory antibody agonism
Yu, X., Orr, C. M., Chan, H. T. C., James, S., Penfold, C. A., Kim, J., Inzhelevskaya, T., Mockridge, C. I., Cox, K. L., Essex, J. W., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05673-2 · Cited by 119
Designed Ankyrin Repeat Proteins (DARPins)
Tamaskovic, R., Simon, M., Stefan, N., Schwill, M., & Plückthun, A. (2012) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-396962-0.00005-7 · Cited by 117
A mechanistic compartmental model for total antibody uptake in tumors
Thurber, G. M., & Wittrup, K. D. (2012) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.08.034 · Cited by 116
Guilleminault, L., Azzopardi, N., Arnoult, C., Sobilo, J., Hervé, V., Montharu, J., Guillon, A., Andres, C. R., Hérault, O., Pape, A. L., et al. (2014) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.10.003 · Cited by 116
Internalization, Trafficking, Intracellular Processing and Actions of Antibody-Drug Conjugates
Xu, S. (2015) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-015-1729-8 · Cited by 108
Antibody‐drug conjugates: Promising and efficient tools for targeted cancer therapy
Nasiri, H., Valedkarimi, Z., Maleki, L. A., & Majidi, J. (2018) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.26435 · Cited by 103
A Mechanistic Tumor Penetration Model to Guide Antibody Drug Conjugate Design
Vasalou, C., Helmlinger, G., & Gomes, B. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118977 · Cited by 98
The development of immunoconjugates for targeted cancer therapy
Smaglo, B. G., Aldeghaither, D. S., & Weiner, L. M. (2014) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.159 · Cited by 98
Self-citationLongatti, A., Schindler, C., Collinson, A., Jenkinson, L., Matthews, C., FitzPatrick, L., Blundy, M., Minter, R., Vaughan, T. J., Shaw, M., et al. (2018) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c8nr03970d · Cited by 96
Targeting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Head and Neck Cancer
Bhatia, A. K. (2022) · The Cancer Journal · doi:10.1097/ppo.0000000000000623 · Cited by 96
Critical Issues in the Development of Immunotoxins for Anticancer Therapy
Kim, J., Jun, S.-Y., & Kim, Y. (2019) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2019.10.037 · Cited by 95
Biology drives the discovery of bispecific antibodies as innovative therapeutics
Nie, S., Wang, Z., Moscoso‐Castro, M., D'Souza, P., Lei, C., Xu, J., & Gu, J. (2020) · Antibody Therapeutics · doi:10.1093/abt/tbaa003 · Cited by 97
Small-Format Drug Conjugates: A Viable Alternative to ADCs for Solid Tumours?
Deonarain, M. P., Yahioglu, G., Stamati, I., Pomowski, A., Clarke, J., Edwards, B. M., Diez-Posada, S., & Stewart, A. (2018) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib7020016 · Cited by 94
Targeted Drug Delivery Systems Mediated by a Novel Peptide in Breast Cancer Therapy and Imaging
Lu, R., Chen, M., Chang, D.-K., Chiu, C., Lin, W.-C., Yan, S.-L., Wang, Y., Kuo, Y., Yeh, C.-Y., Lo, A., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066128 · Cited by 92
Tiwari, P., Yadav, K., Shukla, R. P., Gautam, S., Marwaha, D., Sharma, M., & Mishra, P. R. (2023) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.09.016 · Cited by 88
Sulea, T. I., Rohani, N., Baardsnes, J., Corbeil, C. R., Deprez, C., Donates, Y. C., Robert, A., Schrag, J. D., Parat, M., Duchesne, M., et al. (2019) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2019.1682866 · Cited by 87
Marcucci, F., & Corti, A. (2011) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2011.09.007 · Cited by 90
A Novel Targeting Therapy of Malignant Mesothelioma Using Anti-Podoplanin Antibody
Abe, S., Morita, Y., Kaneko, M. K., Hanibuchi, M., Tsujimoto, Y., Goto, H., Kakiuchi, S., Aono, Y., Huang, J. T., Sato, S., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1300448 · Cited by 85
Tsumura, R., Manabe, S., Takashima, H., Koga, Y., Yasunaga, M., & Matsumura, Y. (2018) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.06.016 · Cited by 85
Anti-Tumour Effects of a Specific Anti-ADAM17 Antibody in an Ovarian Cancer Model In Vivo
Richards, F. M., Tape, C. J., Jodrell, D. I., & Murphy, G. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040597 · Cited by 84
Lee, J., Kim, H. S., Yang, C., Kyeong, H., Choi, J.-M., Hwang, D.-E., Yuk, J., Park, K., Kim, Y., Lee, S., et al. (2014) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2014.59 · Cited by 83
Unveiling the molecular and immunological drivers of antibody–drug conjugates in cancer treatment
Zippelius, A., Tolaney, S. M., Tarantino, P., Balthasar, J. P., & Thurber, G. M. (2025) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-025-00869-w · Cited by 87
Kim, B., Shin, J.-H., Wu, J., Omstead, D. T., Kiziltepe, T., Littlepage, L. E., & Bilgiçer, B. (2020) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.04.010 · Cited by 77
Primer on tumor immunology and cancer immunotherapy
Harris, T. J., & Drake, C. G. (2013) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1186/2051-1426-1-12 · Cited by 78
Bordeau, B. M., Yang, Y., & Balthasar, J. P. (2021) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-3822 · Cited by 75
Wu, Y., Li, Q., Kong, Y., Wang, Z., Lei, C., Li, J., Ding, L., Wang, C., Cheng, Y., Wei, Y., et al. (2022) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.04.013 · Cited by 75
Matsuda, Y., & Mendelsohn, B. A. (2020) · Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy · doi:10.1080/14712598.2021.1846714 · Cited by 74
Demeule, M., Charfi, C., Currie, J.-C., Larocque, A., Zgheib, A., Kozelko, S., Béliveau, R., Marsolais, C., & Annabi, B. (2021) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/cas.15086 · Cited by 73
Khera, E., & Thurber, G. M. (2018) · BioDrugs · doi:10.1007/s40259-018-0302-5 · Cited by 72
Truncation and Mutation of a Transferrin Receptor Aptamer Enhances Binding Affinity
MacDonald, J. P., Houghton, P., Xiang, D., Duan, W., & Shigdar, S. L. (2016) · Nucleic Acid Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/nat.2015.0585 · Cited by 71
The Analysis of Key Factors Related to ADCs Structural Design
Tang, H., Liu, Y., Yu, Z., Sun, M., Lin, L., Liu, W., Han, Q., Wei, M., & Jin, Y. H. (2019) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.00373 · Cited by 70
Liposomes modified with bio-substances for cancer treatment
Li, Y., Cong, H., Wang, S., Yu, B., & Shen, Y. (2020) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d0bm01531h · Cited by 66
Emerging formats for next-generation antibody drug conjugates
Deonarain, M. P., Yahioglu, G., Stamati, I., & Marklew, J. S. (2015) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1517/17460441.2015.1025049 · Cited by 67
Impact of Intrinsic Affinity on Functional Binding and Biological Activity of EGFR Antibodies
Zhou, Y., Goenaga, A.-L., Harms, B. D., Zou, H., Lou, J., Conrad, F., Adams, G. P., Schoeberl, B., Nielsen, U. B., & Marks, J. D. (2012) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-11-1038 · Cited by 72
Self-citationAntikörper‐Wirkstoff‐Konjugate: ein neues Konzept in der Krebstherapie
Chari, R. V. J., Miller, M. L., & Widdison, W. C. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie · doi:10.1002/ange.201307628 · Cited by 67
Antibody-drug conjugates: Current status and future perspectives
Gébleux, R., & Casi, G. (2016) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.07.012 · Cited by 66
Improved Aptamers for the Diagnosis and Potential Treatment of HER2-Positive Cancer
Gijs, M., Penner, G., Blackler, G., Impens, N. R. E. N., Baatout, S., Luxen, A., & Aerts, A. (2016) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph9020029 · Cited by 65
Heyerdahl, H., Abbas, N., Brevik, E. M., Mollatt, C., & Dahle, J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042345 · Cited by 64
Aptamers as radiopharmaceuticals for nuclear imaging and therapy
Gijs, M., Aerts, A., Impens, N. R. E. N., Baatout, S., & Luxen, A. (2015) · Nuclear Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.09.005 · Cited by 63
Forterre, A. V., Wang, J.-H., Delcayre, A., Kim, K., Green, C., Pegram, M. D., Jeffrey, S. S., & Matin, A. C. (2020) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-19-0928 · Cited by 62
The level of HER2 expression is a predictor of antibody-HER2 trafficking behavior in cancer cells
Ram, S., Kim, D. Y., Ober, R. J., & Ward, E. S. (2014) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.29865 · Cited by 62
Cheng, J. C., Liang, M., Carvalho, M. F., Tigue, N. J., Faggioni, R., Roskos, L. K., & Vainshtein, I. (2020) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib9030049 · Cited by 61
Shim, H. (2011) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.3858/emm.2011.43.10.063 · Cited by 66
Enhancing tumor penetration and targeting using size-minimized and zwitterionic nanomedicines
Zhang, Y., Chen, W., Yang, C., Fan, Q., Wu, W., & Jiang, X. (2016) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.07.011 · Cited by 58
Homogeneous plate based antibody internalization assay using pH sensor fluorescent dye
Nath, N., Godat, B., Zimprich, C., Dwight, S. J., Corona, C. R., McDougall, M. G., & Urh, M. (2016) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jim.2016.02.001 · Cited by 57
What makes a good antibody–drug conjugate?
Cecco, M. D., Galbraith, D. N., & McDermott, L. L. (2021) · Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy · doi:10.1080/14712598.2021.1880562 · Cited by 55
Antibody-Drug Conjugate Overview: a State-of-the-art Manufacturing Process and Control Strategy
Li, M., Zhao, X., Yu, C., & Wang, L. (2024) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-023-03649-z · Cited by 54
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations in the Design of Therapeutic Antibodies
Leipold, D. D., & Prabhu, S. (2018) · Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1111/cts.12597 · Cited by 56
Antibody Drug Conjugates: Preclinical Considerations
Bornstein, G. G. (2015) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-015-9738-4 · Cited by 55
Understanding the in vivo fate of radioimmunoconjugates for nuclear imaging
Vivier, D., Sharma, S. K., & Zeglis, B. M. (2018) · Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals · doi:10.1002/jlcr.3628 · Cited by 57
Current approaches for the purification of antibody–drug conjugates
Matsuda, Y. (2021) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.202100575 · Cited by 51
Turini, M., Chames, P., Bruhns, P., Baty, D., & Kerfélec, B. (2014) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.2093 · Cited by 52
Suwannalai, P., Britsemmer, K., Knevel, R., Scherer, H. U., Levarht, E. W. N., Mil, A. H. M. V. D. H., van Schaardenburg, D., Huizinga, T. W. J., Toes, R. E. M., & Trouw, L. A. (2013) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202615 · Cited by 49
Orcutt, K. D., Rhoden, J. J., Ruiz-Yi, B., Frangioni, J. V., & Wittrup, K. D. (2012) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-11-0764 · Cited by 49
Pharmacokinetic Considerations for Antibody-Drug Conjugates against Cancer
Malik, P. R. V., Phipps, C. J., Edginton, A. N., & Blay, J. (2017) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-017-2259-3 · Cited by 48
Fluorescent Dye Labeling Changes the Biodistribution of Tumor-Targeted Nanoparticles
Álamo, P., Pallarès, V., Céspedes, M. V., Falgàs, A., Sánchez, J. M., Serna, N., Sánchez‐García, L., Voltà‐Durán, E., Morris, G. A., Sánchez‐Chardi, A., et al. (2020) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12111004 · Cited by 46
Recent Advances in Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Delivering siRNA for Cancer Treatment
Xie, X., Yue, T., Gu, W., Cheng, W., Li, H., Ren, W., Li, F., & Piao, J. (2023) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15102483 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Rudnick, S. I., Lou, J., Shaller, C. C., Tang, Y., Klein-Szanto, A. J. P., Weiner, L. M., Marks, J. D., & Adams, G. P.
- Affiliations
- Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
- Authors' Affiliations: 1Developmental Therapeutics Program and 2Pathology Department, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 3Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, California; and 4Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Colombia
- Corresponding author
- Adams, Gregory P.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2011-03-14
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2250-2259
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- PMC
- PMC3077882
- OpenAlex
- W2103364597
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 17.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Fox Chase Cancer Center
- National Cancer Institute (R01-CA50633, R01CA118159, T32CA009035, R01CA050633)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
- Keywords
- anti-HER2 antibody, antibody affinity, tumor penetration, tumor targeting, antigen uptake, antibody internalization, antibody catabolism, tumor accumulation, trastuzumab, HER2, perivascular spaces, solid tumors
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antibody Affinity, Epitopes, Antigens, Neoplasm, Binding, Competitive, Endocytosis, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunohistochemistry, Indium Radioisotopes, Iodine Radioisotopes, Mutation, Neoplasm Transplantation, Ovarian Neoplasms, Time Factors, Tissue Distribution, Transplantation, Heterologous, Mice, SCID, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review