Cited by 216Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysCancer Cells and MetastasisTGF-β signaling in diseases

Phenotype Switching: Tumor Cell Plasticity as a Resistance Mechanism and Target for Therapy

Kemper, Kristel, de Goeje, Pauline L., Peeper, Daniel S., van Amerongen, Renée·2014·Cancer Research

Abstract

Mutations in BRAF are present in the majority of patients with melanoma, rendering these tumors sensitive to targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Unfortunately, resistance almost invariably develops. Recently, a phenomenon called "phenotype switching" has been identified as an escape route. By switching from a proliferative to an invasive state, melanoma cells can acquire resistance to these targeted therapeutics. Interestingly, phenotype switching bears a striking resemblance to the epithelial-to-mesenchymal-like transition that has been described to occur in cancer stem cells in other tumor types. We propose that these changes are manifestations of one and the same underlying feature, namely a dynamic and reversible phenotypic tumor cell plasticity that renders a proportion of cells both more invasive and resistant to therapy. At the same time, the specific characteristics of these tumor cell populations offer potential for being explored as target for therapeutic intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-1174

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EMT is a phenotype switching event induced by targeted therapy in various tumors that has been linked to drug tolerance and/or resistance.

    “For instance, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a phenotype switching event induced by targeted therapy in various tumors that has been linked to drug tolerance and/or resistance [78,79].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kemper, K., de Goeje, P. L., Peeper, D. S., & van Amerongen, R.
Affiliations
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • 1Division of Molecular Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • 2Section of Molecular Cytology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2014-10-30
Volume
74
Issue
21
Pages
5937-5941
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2097469924
Cited by
216
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
Keywords
phenotypic switching, tumor plasticity, melanoma, BRAF mutation, MEK inhibitors, targeted therapy resistance, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cancer stem cells, tumor invasion, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Neoplastic Stem Cells, Signal Transduction, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review