Cited by 63scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Publishing and Open AccessAcademic integrity and plagiarism

Widespread Use of Misidentified Cell Line KB (HeLa): Incorrect Attribution and Its Impact Revealed through Mining the Scientific Literature

Vaughan, Liwen, Glänzel, Wolfgang, Korch, Christopher, Capes-Davis, Amanda·2017·Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Continuous cell lines are widely used, but can result in invalid, irreproducible research data. Cell line misidentification is a common problem that can be detected by authentication testing; however, misidentified cell lines continue to be used in publications. Here we explore the impact of one misidentified cell line, KB (HeLa), on the scientific literature. We identified 574 articles between 2000 and 2014 that provided an incorrect attribution for KB, in accordance with its false identity as oral epidermoid carcinoma, but only 57 articles that provided a correct attribution for KB, as HeLa or cervical adenocarcinoma. Statistical analysis of 57 correct and 171 incorrect articles showed that the number of citations to these articles increased over time. Content analysis of 200 citing articles showed there was a tendency to describe the cell line in accordance with the description in the cited paper. Analysis of journal impact factor showed no significant difference between correct and incorrect groups. Articles using KB or citing that usage were most frequently published in the subject areas of pharmacology, pharmacy, oncology, and medicinal chemistry. These findings are important for science policy and support the need for journals to require authentication testing as a condition of publication. Cancer Res; 77(11); 2784-8. ©2017 AACR .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-2258

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Little attention is currently paid to the damage already done through the past distribution of research articles based on misidentified cells.

    “However, little attention is currently paid to the damage that has already been done through the past distribution of research articles based on misidentified cells. Although systems such as retractions and corrections are available to alert other researchers of potential problems in publications, these systems are rarely used to flag problems with cell lines [20, 32].”
  • The set of false positives contains articles using cells in the ICLAC register that are nonetheless reported with their correct origin (as reported for KB cells by Vaughan et al.).

    “The set of false positives contains, among others, articles using cells in the ICLAC register that are nonetheless reported with their correct origin (as reported for KB cells by Vaughan et al. [20]).”
  • Systems such as retractions and corrections are rarely used to flag problems with cell lines.

    “Although systems such as retractions and corrections are available to alert other researchers of potential problems in publications, these systems are rarely used to flag problems with cell lines [20, 32].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaughan, L., Glänzel, W., Korch, C., & Capes-Davis, A.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HU)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • 5CellBank Australia, Children's Medical Research Institute, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2017-05-31
Volume
77
Issue
11
Pages
2784-2788
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2609245071
Cited by
63
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
Keywords
cell line misidentification, KB cells, HeLa cells, scientific literature mining, research reproducibility, citation patterns, journal impact factor
MeSH terms
HeLa Cells, Humans, Biomedical Research, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review