The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Somatic Mutations Drive Distinct Imaging Phenotypes in Lung Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Tumors are characterized by somatic mutations that drive biological processes ultimately reflected in tumor phenotype. With regard to radiographic phenotypes, generally unconnected through present understanding to the presence of specific mutations, artificial intelligence methods can automatically quantify phenotypic characters by using predefined, engineered algorithms or automatic deep-learning methods, a process also known as radiomics. Here we demonstrate how imaging phenotypes can be connected to somatic mutations through an integrated analysis of independent datasets of 763 lung adenocarcinoma patients with somatic mutation testing and engineered CT image analytics. We developed radiomic signatures capable of distinguishing between tumor genotypes in a discovery cohort (n = 353) and verified them in an independent validation cohort (n = 352). All radiomic signatures significantly outperformed conventional radiographic predictors (tumor volume and maximum diameter). We found a radiomic signature related to radiographic heterogeneity that successfully discriminated between EGFR+ and EGFR− cases (AUC = 0.69). Combining this signature with a clinical model of EGFR status (AUC = 0.70) significantly improved prediction accuracy (AUC = 0.75). The highest performing signature was capable of distinguishing between EGFR+ and KRAS+ tumors (AUC = 0.80) and, when combined with a clinical model (AUC = 0.81), substantially improved its performance (AUC = 0.86). A KRAS+/KRAS− radiomic signature also showed significant albeit lower performance (AUC = 0.63) and did not improve the accuracy of a clinical predictor of KRAS status. Our results argue that somatic mutations drive distinct radiographic phenotypes that can be predicted by radiomics. This work has implications for the use of imaging-based biomarkers in the clinic, as applied noninvasively, repeatedly, and at low cost. Cancer Res; 77(14); 3922–30. ©2017 AACR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
FactoMineR : An R Package for Multivariate Analysis
Lê, S., Josse, J., & Husson, F. (2008) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v025.i01 · Cited by 11,603
The cancer genome atlas pan-cancer analysis project
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Weinstein, J. N., Collisson, E. A., Mills, G. B., Shaw, K. R. M., Ozenberger, B. A., Ellrott, K., Shmulevich, I., Sander, C., & Stuart, J. M. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2764 · Cited by 9,092
Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data
Gillies, R. J., Kinahan, P. E., & Hricak, H. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015151169 · Cited by 8,421
Self-citationIntratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing
Gerlinger, M., Rowan, A. J., Horswell, S., Larkin, J., Endesfelder, D., Gronroos, E., Martinez, P., Matthews, N., Stewart, A., Tarpey, P., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1113205 · Cited by 7,774 · cited 1×
“We believe that a detailed analysis of the intratumoral tumor heterogeneity, by compartment mappings, particularly if paired with multiple biopsies at distinct geographical locations, such as investigated in renal cell carcinomas (7, 51), may allow us to further elucidate intratumoral genotype–phenotype relationships.”
BackgroundRadiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis
Lambin, P., Rios-Velazquez, E., Leijenaar, R., Carvalho, S., van Stiphout, R. G. P. M., Granton, P., Zegers, C. M. L., Gillies, R., Boellard, R., Dekker, A., et al. (2012) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036 · Cited by 6,084
Self-citationDecoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach
Aerts, H. J. W. L., Velazquez, E. R., Leijenaar, R. T. H., Parmar, C., Grossmann, P., Carvalho, S., Bussink, J., Monshouwer, R., Haibe-Kains, B., Rietveld, D., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5006 · Cited by 5,132
Self-citationTumour heterogeneity in the clinic
Bedard, P. L., Hansen, A. R., Ratain, M. J., & Siu, L. L. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12627 · Cited by 1,211
Applications and limitations of radiomics
Yip, S. S. F., & Aerts, H. J. W. L. (2016) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/61/13/r150 · Cited by 1,210
Self-citation
Cited by
Artificial intelligence in radiology
Hosny, A., Parmar, C., Quackenbush, J., Schwartz, L. H., & Aerts, H. J. W. L. (2018) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-018-0016-5 · Cited by 3,803
Self-citationArtificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications
Bi, W. L., Hosny, A., Schabath, M. B., Giger, M. L., Birkbak, N. J., Mehrtash, A., Allison, T., Arnaout, O., Abbosh, C., Dunn, I. F., et al. (2019) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21552 · Cited by 1,846
Self-citationThe Biological Meaning of Radiomic Features
Tomaszewski, M. R., & Gillies, R. J. (2021) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2021202553 · Cited by 549
Self-citationWang, S., Shi, J., Ye, Z., Dong, D., Yu, D., Zhou, M., Liu, Y., Gevaert, O., Wang, K., Zhu, Y., et al. (2019) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.00986-2018 · Cited by 435
Self-citationPhysician Confidence in Artificial Intelligence: An Online Mobile Survey
Oh, S., Kim, J. H., Choi, S.-W., Lee, H. J., Hong, J., & Kwon, S. H. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/12422 · Cited by 387
Metadata
- Authors
- Rios Velazquez, E., Parmar, C., Liu, Y., Coroller, T. P., Cruz, G., Stringfield, O., Ye, Z., Makrigiorgos, M., Fennessy, F., Mak, R. H., Gillies, R., Quackenbush, J., & Aerts, H. J. W. L.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2017-07-13
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 3922-3930
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W2620325446
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 27.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Somatic Mutations Drive Distinct Imaging Phenotypes in Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0122
- The paper
- Rios Velazquez, E., Parmar, C., Liu, Y., Coroller, T. P., Cruz, G., Stringfield, O., Ye, Z., Makrigiorgos, M., Fennessy, F., Mak, R. H., Gillies, R., Quackenbush, J., & Aerts, H. J. W. L. (2017). Somatic Mutations Drive Distinct Imaging Phenotypes in Lung Cancer. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
