Cited by 99Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGenetic factors in colorectal cancerCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Breast Cancers with Mismatch Repair Deficiency

Open access
Davies, Helen, Morganella, Sandro, Purdie, Colin A., Jang, Se Jin, Borgen, Elin, Russnes, Hege, Glodzik, Dominik, Zou, Xueqing +8 more·2017·Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Mismatch repair (MMR)–deficient cancers have been discovered to be highly responsive to immune therapies such as PD-1 checkpoint blockade, making their definition in patients, where they may be relatively rare, paramount for treatment decisions. In this study, we utilized patterns of mutagenesis known as mutational signatures, which are imprints of the mutagenic processes associated with MMR deficiency, to identify MMR-deficient breast tumors from a whole-genome sequencing dataset comprising a cohort of 640 patients. We identified 11 of 640 tumors as MMR deficient, but only 2 of 11 exhibited germline mutations in MMR genes or Lynch Syndrome. Two additional tumors had a substantially reduced proportion of mutations attributed to MMR deficiency, where the predominant mutational signatures were related to APOBEC enzymatic activity. Overall, 6 of 11 of the MMR-deficient cases in this cohort were confirmed genetically or epigenetically as having abrogation of MMR genes. However, IHC analysis of MMR-related proteins revealed all but one of 10 samples available for testing as MMR deficient. Thus, the mutational signatures more faithfully reported MMR deficiency than sequencing of MMR genes, because they represent a direct pathophysiologic readout of repair pathway abnormalities. As whole-genome sequencing continues to become more affordable, it could be used to expose individually abnormal tumors in tissue types where MMR deficiency has been rarely detected, but also rarely sought. Cancer Res; 77(18); 4755–62. ©2017 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-1083

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, H., Morganella, S., Purdie, C. A., Jang, S. J., Borgen, E., Russnes, H., Glodzik, D., Zou, X., Viari, A., Richardson, A. L., Børresen-Dale, A.-L., Thompson, A., Eyfjord, J. E., Kong, G., Stratton, M. R., & Nik-Zainal, S.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • Ninewells Hospital (GB)
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • 1Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom.
  • Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • 4Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Iceland (IS)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2017-09-14
Volume
77
Issue
18
Pages
4755-4762
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2754075165
Cited by
99
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • The Royal Society of Chemistry’s Journals, Books and Databases (The Royal Society of Chemistry) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (WT101126/B/13/Z)
  • Cancer Research UK (C60100/A23916)
  • Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (NIH/NCI5 P50 CA168504-02)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF2015R1A2A1A10052578)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
mismatch repair deficiency, breast cancer, mutational signatures, APOBEC mutagenesis, Lynch syndrome, anti-PD-1 therapy, immunotherapy response, tumor mutational burden
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, DNA, Neoplasm, Female, Humans, Genome, Human, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Repair Enzymes, DNA Mismatch Repair, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review