The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex Disparities in Cancer Incidence by Period and Age
Open accessAbstract
Background: Cancer epidemiology articles often point out that cancer rates tend to be higher among males than females yet rarely is this theme the subject of investigation. Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program data to compute age-adjusted (2000 U.S. standard population) sex-specific incidence rates and male-to-female incidence rate ratios (IRR) for specific cancer sites and histologies for the period 1975 to 2004. Results: The 10 cancers with the largest male-to-female IRR were Kaposi sarcoma (28.73), lip (7.16), larynx (5.17), mesothelioma (4.88), hypopharynx (4.13), urinary bladder (3.92), esophagus (3.49), tonsil (3.07), oropharynx (3.06), and other urinary organs (2.92). Only 5 cancers had a higher incidence in females compared with males: breast (0.01), peritoneum, omentum, and mesentery (0.18), thyroid (0.39), gallbladder (0.57), and anus, anal canal, and anorectum (0.81). Between 1975 and 2004, the largest consistent increases in male-to-female IRR were for cancers of the tonsil, oropharynx, skin excluding basal and squamous, and esophagus, whereas the largest consistent decreases in IRR were for cancers of the lip and lung and bronchus. Male-to-female IRRs varied considerably by age, the largest increases of which were for ages 40 to 59 years for tonsil cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. The largest decreases in male-to-female IRR by age, meanwhile, were for ages 30 to 49 years for thyroid cancer, ages >70 years for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and ages >30 years for lung and bronchus cancer. Conclusion: These observations emphasize the importance of sex in cancer etiopathogenesis and may suggest novel avenues of investigation. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(4):1174–82)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. Adults
Calle, E. E., Rodriguez, C., Walker-Thurmond, K., & Thun, M. J. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa021423 · Cited by 7,696
Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health
Courtenay, W. H. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00390-1 · Cited by 4,091
Sex-specific genetic architecture of human disease
Ober, C., Loisel, D. A., & Gilad, Y. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2415 · Cited by 787
Intra‐abdominal pressure, sagittal abdominal diameter and obesity comorbidity
SUGERMAN, H., WINDSOR, A., BESSOS, M., & WOLFE, L. (1997) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.89104000.x · Cited by 486 · cited 1×
“Putative differences between the sexes that may explain the male predominance of esophageal adenocarcinoma include android obesity (32), production and concentration of gastric acid (33), hiatal hernia (34), defective lower esophageal sphincter (34), and higher intra-abdominal and intragastric pressures (35).”
Background
Cited by
Sex differences in immune responses
Klein, S. L., & Flanagan, K. L. (2016) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2016.90 · Cited by 6,370
Cancer immunotherapy efficacy and patients' sex: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Conforti, F., Pala, L., Bagnardi, V., De Pas, T., Martinetti, M., Viale, G., Gelber, R. D., & Goldhirsch, A. (2018) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30261-4 · Cited by 973
Suppressive effects of androgens on the immune system
Trigunaite, A., Dimo, J., & Jørgensen, T. N. (2015) · Cellular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.cellimm.2015.02.004 · Cited by 551
Arnold, M., Laversanne, M., Brown, L. M., Devesa, S. S., & Bray, F. (2017) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2017.155 · Cited by 465
Self-citationThe Confluence of Sex Hormones and Aging on Immunity
Gubbels Bupp, M. R., Potluri, T., Fink, A. L., & Klein, S. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.01269 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook, M. B., Dawsey, S. M., Freedman, N. D., Inskip, P. D., Wichner, S. M., Quraishi, S. M., Devesa, S. S., & McGlynn, K. A.
- Venue
- Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Published
- 2009-04-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1174-1182
- ISSN
- 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2093176183
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.