Cited by 63Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesWomen's cancer prevention and management

Physical activity and fatigue in breast cancer survivors: a panel model examining the role of self-efficacy and depression

Open access
Phillips, Siobhan M., McAuley, Edward·2013·Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

Abstract

Background: Physical activity is associated with reductions in fatigue in breast cancer survivors. However, mechanisms underlying this relationship are not well-understood. The purpose of this study was to longitudinally test a model examining the role of self-efficacy and depression as potential mediators of the relationship between physical activity and fatigue in a sample of breast cancer survivors using both self-report and objective measures of physical activity. Methods: All participants (N = 1,527) completed self-report measures of physical activity, self-efficacy, depression, and fatigue at baseline and 6 months. A subsample was randomly selected to wear an accelerometer at both time points. It was hypothesized that physical activity indirectly influences fatigue via self-efficacy and depression. Relationships among model constructs were examined over the 6-month period using panel analysis within a covariance modeling framework. Results: The hypothesized model provided a good model-data fit (χ2 = 599.66, df = 105, P ≤ 0.001; CFI = 0.96; SRMR = 0.02) in the full sample when controlling for covariates. At baseline, physical activity indirectly influenced fatigue via self-efficacy and depression. These relationships were also supported across time. In addition, the majority of the hypothesized relationships were supported in the subsample with accelerometer data (χ2 = 387.48, df = 147, P ≤ 0.001, CFI = 0.94, SRMR = 0.04). Conclusions: This study provides evidence to suggest the relationship between physical activity and fatigue in breast cancer survivors may be mediated by more proximal, modifiable outcomes of physical activity participation. Impact: Recommendations are made relative to future applications and research concerning these relationships. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 22(5); 773–81. ©2013 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-0983

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological flexibility and self-efficacy may contribute to differences in pain severity and the impact of persistent post-surgical pain.

    “Two additional psychosocial variables that may contribute to differences in the experience of pain severity and the impact of PSP are: 1) psychological flexibility18–20, a flexible behavior pattern broadly oriented toward ones chosen personal values, even in the presence of discomforts (such as pain), and 2) self-efficacy21–25, the belief in one’s ability to effectively manage pain.”

    From Improving well-being for individuals with persistent pain after surgery for breast cancer, lobular carcinoma in situ, or ductal carcinoma in situ: A randomized clinical trial (2022) · cites this paper as [24]

    The citation is attached to the self-efficacy portion of the sentence, not psychological flexibility. The Results (Model Results; page unavailable) associate exercise self-efficacy with fatigue and depression in breast cancer survivors. The Measures section assesses confidence in exercising, not managing pain; the paper does not establish a relationship with persistent post-surgical pain severity or its impact. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phillips, S. M., & McAuley, E.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Phillips, Siobhan M.
Venue
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2013-05-01
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
773-781
ISSN
  • 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7755
OpenAlex
W2138428156
Cited by
63
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R56AG020118, F31AG034025, R01AG020118, AG020118)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
physical activity, fatigue, breast cancer survivors, self-efficacy, depression, mediation, accelerometer-measured activity, cancer survivorship
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Data Collection, Depressive Disorder, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Survivors, Self Efficacy, Self Report, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review