The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Phase II Trial of Vorinostat (Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid) in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A California Cancer Consortium Study
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The primary goal of this trial was to determine the response rate of single-agent vorinostat in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The secondary goals included assessment of time to progression, evaluation of toxicities, and overall survival. Experimental Design: From June 2005 to March 2006, 14 patients received vorinostat, 200 mg p.o., twice daily for 14 days of each 21 day cycle. Response and progression were evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Results: The median age for all patients was 60.5 years (range, 37-88). Eight patients were estrogen receptor and/or progesterone positive, four were Her-2 positive. Sites of metastatic disease included brain, liver, lungs, bones, pelvis, pleura, chest wall, and distant lymph nodes. Patients received a median of 1.5 prior (range, 0-2) chemotherapeutic regimens for metastatic disease. Fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, and lymphopenia were the most frequent clinically significant adverse effects. The median number of cycles delivered was 2 (range, 1-20). There were no complete or partial responses, and the study was terminated after the first stage; however, 4 patients were observed with stable disease with time to progression of 4, 8, 9, and 14 months. The median number of months that patients received treatment on this study was 1.7 (range, 0.5-14). Conclusions: Although not meeting the RECIST response criteria for adequate single-agent activity, the observed tolerable toxicities and the potential for clinical benefit in terms of stable disease suggest that further assessment of vorinostat as a part of combination therapy with either chemotherapeutic or targeted agents in metastatic breast might be undertaken.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., Hart, A. A. M., Mao, M., Peterse, H. L., van der Kooy, K., Marton, M. J., Witteveen, A. T., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415530a · Cited by 9,536
Cited by
(2011) · PubMed Central · Cited by 560
HDAC inhibitors in cancer biology: emerging mechanisms and clinical applications
Khan, O., & La Thangue, N. B. (2012) · Immunology & Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/icb.2011.100 · Cited by 450
Epigenetics in cancer stem cells
Toh, T. B., Lim, J. J., & Chow, E. K.-H. (2017) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-017-0596-9 · Cited by 422
Munster, P. N., Thurn, K. T., Thomas, S., Raha, P., Lacevic, M., Miller, A., Melisko, M., Ismail-Khan, R., Rugo, H., Moasser, M., et al. (2011) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.156 · Cited by 391
Therapeutic Implications of Cellular Heterogeneity and Plasticity in Breast Cancer
Brooks, M. D., Burness, M. L., & Wicha, M. S. (2015) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2015.08.014 · Cited by 374
Metadata
- Authors
- Luu, T. H., Morgan, R. J., Leong, L., Lim, D., McNamara, M., Portnow, J., Frankel, P., Smith, D. D., Doroshow, J. H., Gandara, D. R., Aparicio, A., Somlo, G., & Wong, C.
- Venue
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2008-11-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 7138-7142
- ISSN
- 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3265
- OpenAlex
- W1998957807
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Phase II Trial of Vorinostat (Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid) in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A California Cancer Consortium Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0122
- The paper
- Luu, T. H., Morgan, R. J., Leong, L., Lim, D., McNamara, M., Portnow, J., Frankel, P., Smith, D. D., Doroshow, J. H., Gandara, D. R., Aparicio, A., Somlo, G., & Wong, C. (2008). A Phase II Trial of Vorinostat (Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid) in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A California Cancer Consortium Study. Clinical Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.