Cited by 22Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesBreast Lesions and CarcinomasBRCA gene mutations in cancer

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationship between Quantitative GRB7 RNA Expression and Recurrence after Adjuvant Anthracycline Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: To conduct an exploratory analysis of the relationship between gene expression and recurrence in patients with operable triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with adjuvant doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy. Experimental Design: RNA was extracted from archived tumor samples derived from 246 patients with stage I-III TNBC treated with adjuvant doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy, and was analyzed by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR for a panel of 374 genes. The relationship between gene expression and recurrence was evaluated using weighted Cox proportional hazards model score tests. Results: Growth factor receptor bound protein 7 (GRB7) was the only gene for which higher expression was significantly associated with increased recurrence in TNBC (Korn's adjusted P value = 0.04). In a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for clinicopathologic features, higher GRB7 expression was associated with an increased recurrence risk (HR = 2.31; P = 0.04 using the median as the split). The 5-year recurrence rates were 10.5% [95% confidence intervals (CI), 7.8–14.1] in the low and 20.4% (95% CI, 16.5–25.0) in the high GRB7 groups. External validation in other datasets indicated that GRB7 expression was not prognostic in two adjuvant trials including variable systemic therapy, but in two other trials showed that high GBR7 expression was associated with resistance to neoadjuvant doxorubicin and taxane therapy. Conclusions: GRB7 was associated with an increased risk of recurrence in TNBC, suggesting that GRB7 or GRB7-dependent pathways may serve as potential biomarkers for therapeutic targets. Therapeutic targeting of one or more factors identified which function as interaction nodes or effectors should also be considered. Clin Cancer Res; 17(22); 7194–203. ©2011 AACR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-3357

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cronin, 2004, Measurement of gene expression in archival paraffin-embedded tissues: development and performance of a 92-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay, Am J Pathol, 164, 35, 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63093-3 · DOI
  2. Korn, 2004, Controlling the number of false discoveries: application to high-dimensional genomic data, J Statist Plan Infer, 124, 379, 10.1016/S0378-3758(03)00211-8 · DOI
  3. Badve, 2007, Concordance of local and central laboratory hormone and HER2 receptor status in ECOG 2197, J Clin Oncol, 25, 18s, 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.21022 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sparano, J. A., Goldstein, L. J., Childs, B. H., Shak, S., Brassard, D., Badve, S., Baehner, F. L., Bugarini, R., Rowley, S., Perez, E. A., Shulman, L. N., Martino, S., Davidson, N. E., Kenny, P. A., Sledge, G. W., & Gray, R.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Health (US)
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Sparano, Joseph A.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2011-11-14
Volume
17
Issue
22
Pages
7194-7203
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2116469621
Cited by
22
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Sanofi
  • Northwestern University
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca032012-03)
  • Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Institute (U10CA066636, CA-23318, U10CA014958, (CA-25224, CA66636, CA32012, U10CA032291, U10CA025224, CA 32291, U24CA114737, U10CA086802, U10CA023318, U10CA021115, CA 21115)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Keywords
Grb7, triple-negative breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy, doxorubicin, recurrence, prognostic factors, gene expression, anthracycline resistance, taxane resistance, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Breast Neoplasms, Doxorubicin, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptors, Progesterone, Recurrence, Biomarkers, Tumor, Gene Expression, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Receptor, ErbB-2, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, GRB7 Adaptor Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review