Cited by 67Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

Dual Inhibition of EGFR and c-Src by Cetuximab and Dasatinib Combined with FOLFOX Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: Aberrant activation of the intracellular tyrosine kinase Src has been implicated as a mechanism of acquired chemotherapy resistance in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Here, the oral tyrosine kinase Src inhibitor, dasatinib, was investigated in combination with FOLFOX and cetuximab. Experimental Design: We performed a phase IB/II study of 77 patients with previously treated mCRC. Primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacodynamics, and efficacy. Using a 3 + 3 design, patients received FOLFOX6 with cetuximab and escalating doses of dasatinib (100, 150, 200 mg daily), followed by a 12-patient expansion cohort at 150 mg. Phase II studies evaluated FOLFOX plus dasatinib 100 mg in KRAS c12/13mut patients or in combination with cetuximab if KRAS c12/13WT. FAK and paxillin were utilized as surrogate blood biomarkers of Src inhibition, and paired biopsies of liver metastases were obtained in patients in the expansion cohort. Results: In phase IB, the DLTs were grade 3/4 fatigue (20%) and neutropenia (23%). In phase II, grade 3/4 fatigue (23%) and pleural effusions (11%) were present. Response rates were 20% (6 of 30) in the phase IB escalation and expansion cohort and 13% (3 of 24) and 0% (0 of 23) in the KRAS c12/13WT and mutant cohorts of phase II, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 4.6, 2.3, and 2.3 months, respectively. There was no evidence of Src inhibition based on surrogate blood biomarkers or paired tumor biopsies. Conclusions: The combination of dasatinib plus FOLFOX with or without cetuximab showed only modest clinical activity in refractory colorectal cancer. This appears to be primarily due to a failure to fully inhibit Src at the achievable doses of dasatinib. The combination of dasatinib plus FOLFOX with or without cetuximab did not show meaningful clinical activity in refractory colorectal cancer due to failure to fully inhibit Src. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4146–54. ©2017 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-3138

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A phase IB/II study of 77 refractory colorectal cancer patients treated with dasatinib plus FOLFOX and cetuximab did not demonstrate meaningful clinical activity because the treatment did not fully inhibit the intracellular tyrosine kinase Src.

    “A phase IB/II study of 77 refractory CRC patients treated with dasatinib plus FOLFOX and cetuximab did not demonstrate meaningful clinical activity because the treatment did not fully inhibit the intracellular tyrosine kinase Src [24].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parseghian, C. M., Parikh, N. U., Wu, J. Y., Jiang, Z.-Q., Henderson, L., Tian, F., Pastor, B., Ychou, M., Raghav, K., Dasari, A., Fogelman, D. R., Katsiampoura, A. D., Menter, D. G., Wolff, R. A., Eng, C., Overman, M. J., Thierry, A. R., Gallick, G. E., & Kopetz, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (FR)
Corresponding author
Parseghian, Christine M.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2017-08-01
Volume
23
Issue
15
Pages
4146-4154
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2593973360
Cited by
67
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR000370)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA184843, R01CA172670)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
metastatic colorectal cancer, dasatinib, cetuximab, FOLFOX, EGFR inhibition, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, chemoresistance, KRAS mutation, focal adhesion kinase, paxillin, surrogate markers, maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, combination therapy, refractory colorectal cancer, liver metastasis, progression-free survival, response rate
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Dasatinib, CSK Tyrosine-Protein Kinase, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Leucovorin, Female, Fluorouracil, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Organoplatinum Compounds, Colorectal Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Disease-Free Survival, src-Family Kinases, Maximum Tolerated Dose, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review