The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
False-Positive Plasma Genotyping Due to Clonal Hematopoiesis
Abstract
Purpose: Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) genotyping is increasingly used in cancer care, but assay accuracy has been debated. Because most cfDNA is derived from peripheral blood cells (PBC), we hypothesized that nonmalignant mutations harbored by hematopoietic cells (clonal hematopoiesis, CH) could be a cause of false-positive plasma genotyping. Experimental Design: We identified patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with KRAS, JAK2, or TP53 mutations identified in cfDNA. With consent, PBC DNA was tested using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) to test for CH-derived mutations. Results: We first studied plasma ddPCR results from 58 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Two had KRAS G12X detected in cfDNA, and both were present in PBC, including one where the KRAS mutation was detected serially for 20 months. We then studied 143 plasma NGS results from 122 patients with NSCLC and identified 5 JAK2 V617F mutations derived from PBC. In addition, 108 TP53 mutations were detected in cfDNA; for 33 of the TP53 mutations, PBC and tumor NGS were available for comparison, and 5 were present in PBC but absent in tumor, consistent with CH. Conclusions: We find that most JAK2 mutations, some TP53 mutations, and rare KRAS mutations detected in cfDNA are derived from CH not tumor. Clinicians ordering plasma genotyping must be prepared for the possibility that mutations detected in plasma, particularly in genes mutated in CH, may not represent true tumor genotype. Efforts to use plasma genotyping for cancer detection may need paired PBC genotyping so that CH-derived mutations are not misdiagnosed as occult malignancy. Clin Cancer Res; 24(18); 4437–43. ©2018 AACR. See related commentary by Bauml and Levy, p. 4352
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes
Jaiswal, S., Fontanillas, P., Flannick, J., Manning, A., Grauman, P. V., Mar, B. G., Lindsley, R. C., Mermel, C. H., Burtt, N., Chavez, A., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1408617 · Cited by 4,841
Clonal hematopoiesis and blood-cancer risk inferred from blood DNA sequence
Genovese, G., Kähler, A. K., Handsaker, R. E., Lindberg, J., Rose, S. A., Bakhoum, S. F., Chambert, K., Mick, E., Neale, B. M., Fromer, M., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1409405 · Cited by 3,531
Liquid biopsies come of age: Towards implementation of circulating tumour DNA
Wan, J. C. M., Massie, C., Garcia-Corbacho, J., Mouliere, F., Brenton, J. D., Caldas, C., Pacey, S., Baird, R., & Rosenfeld, N. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2017.7 · Cited by 2,809
Age-related mutations associated with clonal hematopoietic expansion and malignancies
Xie, M., Lu, C., Wang, J., McLellan, M. D., Johnson, K. J., Wendl, M. C., McMichael, J. F., Schmidt, H. K., Yellapantula, V., Miller, C. A., et al. (2014) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3733 · Cited by 1,874
Oxnard, G. R., Thress, K. S., Alden, R. S., Lawrance, R., Paweletz, C. P., Cantarini, M., Yang, J. C.-H., Barrett, J. C., & Jänne, P. A. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.66.7162 · Cited by 850
Self-citationLeukemia-associated somatic mutations drive distinct patterns of age-related clonal hemopoiesis
McKerrell, T., Park, N., Moreno, T., Grove, C. S., Ponstingl, H., Stephens, J., Crawley, C., Craig, J., Scott, M. A., Hodkinson, C., et al. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.005 · Cited by 534
Cited by
Current and future perspectives of liquid biopsies in genomics-driven oncology
Heitzer, E., Haque, I. S., Roberts, C. E. S., & Speicher, M. R. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0071-5 · Cited by 1,557
Liu, M. C., Oxnard, G. R., Klein, E. A., Swanton, C., Seiden, M. V., Liu, M. C., Oxnard, G. R., Klein, E. A., Smith, D., Richards, D., et al. (2020) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.02.011 · Cited by 1,495
Self-citationLiquid biopsy enters the clinic — implementation issues and future challenges
Ignatiadis, M., Sledge, G. W., & Jeffrey, S. S. (2021) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-020-00457-x · Cited by 1,191
Rolfo, C., Mack, P., Scagliotti, G. V., Aggarwal, C., Arcila, M. E., Barlesi, F., Bivona, T., Diehn, M., Dive, C., Dziadziuszko, R., et al. (2021) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2021.06.017 · Cited by 683
Le, X., Puri, S., Negrao, M. V., Nilsson, M. B., Robichaux, J., Boyle, T., Hicks, J. K., Lovinger, K. L., Roarty, E., Rinsurongkawong, W., et al. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-1542 · Cited by 387
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, Y., Ulrich, B. C., Supplee, J., Kuang, Y., Lizotte, P. H., Feeney, N. B., Guibert, N. M., Awad, M. M., Wong, K.-K., Jänne, P. A., Paweletz, C. P., & Oxnard, G. R.
- Venue
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2018-09-14
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 4437-4443
- ISSN
- 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3265
- OpenAlex
- W2792694005
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 14.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: False-Positive Plasma Genotyping Due to Clonal Hematopoiesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0143
- The paper
- Hu, Y., Ulrich, B. C., Supplee, J., Kuang, Y., Lizotte, P. H., Feeney, N. B., Guibert, N. M., Awad, M. M., Wong, K.-K., Jänne, P. A., Paweletz, C. P., & Oxnard, G. R. (2018). False-Positive Plasma Genotyping Due to Clonal Hematopoiesis. Clinical Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
