Association Between Plasma Genotyping and Outcomes of Treatment With Osimertinib (AZD9291) in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated potent activity against TKI resistance mediated by EGFR T790M. We studied whether noninvasive genotyping of cell-free plasma DNA (cfDNA) is a useful biomarker for prediction of outcome from a third-generation EGFR-TKI, osimertinib. Methods: Plasma was collected from all patients in the first-in-man study of osimertinib. Patients who were included had acquired EGFR-TKI resistance and evidence of a common EGFR-sensitizing mutation. Genotyping of cell-free plasma DNA was performed by using BEAMing. Plasma genotyping accuracy was assessed by using tumor genotyping from a central laboratory as reference. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed in all T790M-positive or T790M-negative patients. Results: Sensitivity of plasma genotyping for detection of T790M was 70%. Of 58 patients with T790M-negative tumors, T790M was detected in plasma of 18 (31%). ORR and median PFS were similar in patients with T790M-positive plasma (ORR, 63%; PFS, 9.7 months) or T790M-positive tumor (ORR, 62%; PFS, 9.7 months) results. Although patients with T790M-negative plasma had overall favorable outcomes (ORR, 46%; median PFS, 8.2 months), tumor genotyping distinguished a subset of patients positive for T790M who had better outcomes (ORR, 69%; PFS, 16.5 months) as well as a subset of patients negative for T790M with poor outcomes (ORR, 25%; PFS, 2.8 months). Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis, patients positive for T790M in plasma have outcomes with osimertinib that are equivalent to patients positive by a tissue-based assay. This study suggests that, upon availability of validated plasma T790M assays, some patients could avoid a tumor biopsy for T790M genotyping. As a result of the 30% false-negative rate of plasma genotyping, those with T790M-negative plasma results still need a tumor biopsy to determine presence or absence of T790M.
Verified 2026-10-06 · 10 references not checked yet
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a retrospective analysis of the phase I AURA trial, patients with T790M detected in plasma by BEAMing had osimertinib outcomes similar to those with T790M detected in tumor tissue. Because plasma genotyping had a 30% false-negative rate for T790M, patients with T790M-negative plasma still needed tumor biopsy to determine T790M status.
Key findings
- Plasma genotyping sensitivity was 70% for T790M (111 of 158; 95% CI, 63% to 77%), 82% for exon 19 deletion (112 of 136; 95% CI, 75% to 88%), and 86% for L858R (63 of 73; 95% CI, 76% to 93%).
- Of 58 patients with T790M-negative tumors, T790M was detected in plasma in 18 (31%); repeat testing with an alternative plasma assay confirmed T790M in 14 of 18 (78%).
- ORR and median PFS were similar for T790M-positive plasma (ORR, 63%; PFS, 9.7 months) and T790M-positive tumor (ORR, 62%; PFS, 9.7 months).
- Among patients with T790M-negative plasma, tumor genotyping distinguished T790M-positive tumors (ORR, 69%; PFS, 16.5 months) from T790M-negative tumors (ORR, 25%; PFS, 2.8 months).
Methods
- Post hoc/exploratory analysis of the phase I AURA study of osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC; 402 patients enrolled, 60 first-line patients excluded, 34 without a common EGFR-sensitizing mutation excluded, leaving 308 patients.
- Plasma cfDNA was collected before osimertinib and genotyped by BEAMing for T790M, L858R, and exon 19 deletion variants; positivity thresholds were ≥ 0.04% allelic fraction for exon 19 deletion or L858R and ≥ 0.06% for T790M; discordant plasma/tumor T790M results were retested with cobas plasma EGFR assay or ddPCR.
- Outcomes included confirmed ORR, maximum change in target lesion size, and PFS by RECIST version 1.1 per investigator; analyses used Clopper-Pearson exact CIs, Fisher’s exact or χ2 tests, and Kaplan-Meier estimates with log-rank tests.
Limitations
- The paper states the analysis was not preplanned, the study population was not fully representative of all acquired EGFR-TKI resistance because of intentional enrichment for T790M-positive patients, BEAMing was not performed under Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments conditions, and prospective validation is needed.
- Evident from the text: this was a retrospective post hoc analysis, and some key subgroups were small, such as the 18 patients with T790M-positive plasma but T790M-negative tumor genotyping.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 18 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ RESULTS
T790M was detected in 80% of patients with a detectable EGFR-sensitizing mutation in plasma versus only 5% of patients without a detectable EGFR-sensitizing mutation in plasma (P<.001).
“T790M was detected in 80% of patients (110 of 137) with versus only 5% of patients (1 of 21) without a detectable EGFR-sensitizing mutation in plasma (P<.001, Fig A2B)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Specificity of plasma genotyping for L858R was 97%.
“Plasma genotyping resulted in rare false positives for exon 19 deletions and L858R (specificity, 98% and 97%, respectively; Table 1, Appendix Fig A2C, online only)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Sensitivity of plasma genotyping for exon 19 deletion was 82% (112 of 136; 95% CI, 75% to 88%).
“sensitivity of plasma genotyping for the known sensitizing mutation was 82% for exon 19 deletions (112 of 136; 95% CI, 75% to 88%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Sensitivity of plasma genotyping for EGFR-sensitizing mutations was significantly higher in patients with liver metastases (94% v 79%; P = .008).
“sensitivity of plasma genotyping for EGFR-sensitizing mutations was significantly higher in patients with liver metastases (94% v 79%; P = .008)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ DISCUSSION
Those 40 patients with T790M-negative plasma and T790M-negative tumor genotyping had a median PFS of 2.8 months.
“Of 102 patients from this study with T790M-negative plasma, 45 had tumor genotyping that was positive for T790M, and these patients had a median PFS of 16.2 months, whereas 40 patients had tumor genotyping that was negative for T790M and a median PFS of 2.8 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data§ RESULTS
Median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 6.8 months) in patients with T790M-negative plasma and detectable TKI-sensitive EGFR mutation.
“and median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 6.8 months; Appendix Fig A3, online only).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
ORR was 38% (26 of 69; 95% CI, 26% to 50%) in patients with T790M-negative plasma and detectable TKI-sensitive EGFR mutation.
“In 69 patients with TKI-sensitive EGFR mutation detected in plasma (T790M negative/sens positive), ORR was 38% (26 of 69; 95% CI, 26% to 50%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Of 58 patients with T790M-negative tumors, T790M was detected in plasma of 18 (31%).
“Of 58 patients with T790M-negative tumors, T790M was detected in plasma of 18 (31%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
T790M positivity was confirmed by an alternative plasma assay in 14 of 18 tested plasmas (78%) that were discordant between tissue and plasma.
“T790M positivity was confirmed by using an alternative assay in 14 of 18 tested plasmas (78%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ DISCUSSION
Those 45 patients with T790M-negative plasma and T790M-positive tumor genotyping had a median PFS of 16.2 months.
“Of 102 patients from this study with T790M-negative plasma, 45 had tumor genotyping that was positive for T790M, and these patients had a median PFS of 16.2 months, whereas 40 patients had tumor genotyping that was negative for T790M and a median PFS of 2.8 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
ORR was 63% (103 of 164; 95% CI, 55% to 70%) in patients positive for T790M in plasma.
“Of 271 patients with plasma genotyping, 164 were positive for T790M in plasma and displayed a 63% ORR (103 of 164; 95% CI, 55% to 70%; Fig 2C)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Among patients with T790M-positive plasma, median PFS was higher in those with T790M-positive tumors than in those with T790M-negative tumors (9.3 months v 4.2 months; P = .0002).
“ORR and median PFS higher in those with T790M-positive tumors (69 of 108; 64%; 95% CI, 54% to 73%; PFS, 9.3 months) than in those with T790M-negative tumors (5 of 18; 28%; 95% CI, 10% to 53%; P = .004; PFS, 4.2 months; P = .0002; Fig 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Among patients with T790M-positive plasma, ORR was higher in those with T790M-positive tumors (69 of 108; 64%; 95% CI, 54% to 73%) than in those with T790M-negative tumors (5 of 18; 28%; 95% CI, 10% to 53%; P = .004).
“ORR and median PFS higher in those with T790M-positive tumors (69 of 108; 64%; 95% CI, 54% to 73%; PFS, 9.3 months) than in those with T790M-negative tumors (5 of 18; 28%; 95% CI, 10% to 53%; P = .004; PFS, 4.2 months; P = .0002; Fig 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ DISCUSSION
Of 102 patients from this study with T790M-negative plasma, 45 had tumor genotyping that was positive for T790M.
“Of 102 patients from this study with T790M-negative plasma, 45 had tumor genotyping that was positive for T790M, and these patients had a median PFS of 16.2 months, whereas 40 patients had tumor genotyping that was negative for T790M and a median PFS of 2.8 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Relative T790M AF in plasma was higher in patients with T790M-positive tumors than in patients with T790M-negative tumors (median relative T790M AF, 33.6% v 16.8%; P = .0047).
“the relative T790M AF in plasma was calculated for patients with detectable T790M and sensitizing mutation in cfDNA and was higher in 108 patients with T790M-positive tumors than in 16 patients with T790M-negative tumors (median relative T790M AF, 33.6% v 16.8%; P = .0047; Fig 4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Median PFS was significantly longer in patients with T790M-positive tumors (9.7 months; 95% CI, 8.3 to 12.5 months) than in patients with T790M-negative tumors (3.4 months; 95% CI, 2.1 to 4.3 months; P < .001).
“Median PFS was significantly longer in 179 patients with T790M-positive tumors (9.7 months; 95% CI, 8.3 to 12.5 months) than in 58 patients with T790M-negative tumors (3.4 months; 95% CI, 2.1 to 4.3 months; P < .001; Fig 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ DISCUSSION
Of 164 patients from this study with T790M-positive plasma genotyping, 18 had T790M-negative tumor genotyping.
“Of 164 patients from this study with T790M-positive plasma genotyping, 18 had T790M-negative tumor genotyping, presumably as a result of heterogeneous presence of resistance mutation as a minor clone, and these patients had a response rate of 28% (5 of 18) and median PFS of 4.2 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ DISCUSSION
Of 102 patients with T790M-negative plasma, 40 had tumor genotyping that was negative for T790M.
“Of 102 patients from this study with T790M-negative plasma, 45 had tumor genotyping that was positive for T790M, and these patients had a median PFS of 16.2 months, whereas 40 patients had tumor genotyping that was negative for T790M and a median PFS of 2.8 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Among patients with T790M-negative plasma, ORR was higher in patients with T790M-positive tumors (31 of 45; 69%; 95% CI, 53% to 82%) than in patients with T790M-negative tumors (10 of 40; 25%; 95% CI, 13% to 41%; P < .001).
“ORR was higher in patients with T790M-positive tumors (31 of 45; 69%; 95% CI, 53% to 82%) than in patients with T790M-negative tumors (10 of 40; 25%; 95% CI, 13% to 41%; P < .001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Among patients with T790M-negative plasma, median PFS was longer in patients with T790M-positive tumors than in patients with T790M-negative tumors (16.5 months v 2.8 months; P < .001).
“as was median PFS (16.5 months v 2.8 months; P < .001; Fig 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Sensitivity of plasma genotyping for T790M was 70% (111 of 158; 95% CI, 63% to 77%) in patients positive for T790M on central tumor genotyping.
“Sensitivity of plasma genotyping for T790M was 70% (111 of 158; 95% CI, 63% to 77%) in patients positive for T790M on central tumor genotyping”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Specificity of plasma genotyping for exon 19 deletion was 98%.
“Plasma genotyping resulted in rare false positives for exon 19 deletions and L858R (specificity, 98% and 97%, respectively; Table 1, Appendix Fig A2C, online only)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Patients with relative T790M AF > 10% showed a greater depth of response compared with those with relative T790M AF < 10% (P = .0407).
“but patients with relative T790M AF > 10% showed a greater depth of response compared with those with relative T790M AF < 10% (P = .0407; Fig 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ RESULTS
Across 126 patients with known tumor sensitizing mutation detected in plasma and detectable plasma T790M, increased relative T790M AF was not associated overall with a greater depth of response (R = −0.183).
“Across 126 patients with known tumor sensitizing mutation detected in plasma and detectable plasma T790M, increased relative T790M AF was not associated overall with a greater depth of response (R = −0.183)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ DISCUSSION
The relative AF of plasma T790M is lower in patients with T790M-negative central tumor genotyping than in patients with T790M-positive plasma and tumors.
“We found that 31% of patients who are negative for T790M on central tumor genotyping have detectable T790M in plasma with a BEAMing assay that otherwise has negligible false positives, though the relative AF of plasma T790M is lower in these patients than in patients with T790M-positive plasma and tumors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ DISCUSSION
31% of patients who are negative for T790M on central tumor genotyping have detectable T790M in plasma with a BEAMing assay that otherwise has negligible false positives.
“We found that 31% of patients who are negative for T790M on central tumor genotyping have detectable T790M in plasma with a BEAMing assay that otherwise has negligible false positives, though the relative AF of plasma T790M is lower in these patients than in patients with T790M-positive plasma and tumors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The BEAMing assay has negligible false positives for T790M.
- Interpretationown data§ Conclusion
As a result of the 30% false-negative rate of plasma genotyping, those with T790M-negative plasma results still need a tumor biopsy to determine presence or absence of T790M.
“As a result of the 30% false-negative rate of plasma genotyping, those with T790M-negative plasma results still need a tumor biopsy to determine presence or absence of T790M.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSION
Testing for EGFR driver mutations in plasma may help identify patients with T790M-negative plasma who are more or less likely to benefit from osimertinib.
“Of interest, we found that testing for EGFR driver mutations in plasma may help identify those patients with T790M-negative plasma who are more or less likely to benefit from osimertinib treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSION
The discordance in those 18 patients is presumably due to heterogeneous presence of resistance mutation as a minor clone.
“Of 164 patients from this study with T790M-positive plasma genotyping, 18 had T790M-negative tumor genotyping, presumably as a result of heterogeneous presence of resistance mutation as a minor clone, and these patients had a response rate of 28% (5 of 18) and median PFS of 4.2 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSION
The plasma T790M-negative population is a mixture of true and false negatives.
“As the plasma T790M-negative population is a mixture of true and false negatives, biopsy to further investigate the presence of T790M-positive tumor tissue is warranted (Fig 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSION
In patients with T790M-negative/sens-positive plasma genotyping, tumor genotyping of T790M is needed to identify candidates for osimertinib.
“With such a mixed outcome as this, tumor genotyping of T790M is needed to identify candidates for osimertinib; however, when no sensitizing mutation is detected in patients with known EGFR-mutant lung cancer and acquired resistance, plasma genotyping for T790M becomes uninformative.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ DISCUSSION
Plasma genotyping has a high positive predictive value for T790M in prior studies.
“This is consistent with the high positive predictive value seen with plasma genotyping in prior studies.23,25”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [23]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [25] 25. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0173. Sacher AG, Paweletz C, Dahlberg SE, et al: Prospective Validation of Rapid Plasma Genotyping for the Detection of EGFR and KRAS Mutations in Advanced Lung Cancer. JAMA Oncol 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0173 [epub ahead of print on April 7, 2016] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Articles from Journal of Clinical Oncology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Clinical Oncology
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSION
If plasma genotyping for T790M is negative, it cannot fully obviate the need for a tumor biopsy.
“In contrast, if plasma genotyping for T790M is negative, this result cannot fully obviate need for a tumor biopsy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Conclusion
Upon availability of validated plasma T790M assays, some patients could avoid a tumor biopsy for T790M genotyping.
“This study suggests that, upon availability of validated plasma T790M assays, some patients could avoid a tumor biopsy for T790M genotyping.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ RESULTS
Detection of the resistance mutation in plasma is unlikely when a sensitizing mutation is not detected.
“which indicates that detection of the resistance mutation in plasma is unlikely when a sensitizing mutation is not detected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ INTRODUCTION
In previously published data from the AURA study, osimertinib exhibited a better confirmed ORR (61% v 21%) and median PFS (9.6 months v 2.8 months) in patients with T790M-positive versus T790M-negative tumor genotyping.
“In previously published data from the AURA study, osimertinib exhibited a better response rate (confirmed ORR, 61% v 21%) and median progression-free survival (PFS; 9.6 months v 2.8 months) in patients with T790M-positive versus T790M-negative tumor genotyping.12”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ Conclusion
In this retrospective analysis, patients positive for T790M in plasma have outcomes with osimertinib that are equivalent to patients positive by a tissue-based assay.
“In this retrospective analysis, patients positive for T790M in plasma have outcomes with osimertinib that are equivalent to patients positive by a tissue-based assay.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSION
Clinical outcomes on osimertinib in patients with T790M-positive plasma genotyping are similar to those in patients with T790M-positive tumor genotyping.
“Clinical outcomes on osimertinib in patients with T790M-positive plasma genotyping results are similar to those achieved when treating patients with T790M-positive tumor genotyping results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ RESULTS
The absence of T790M in patients with no detectable tumor DNA in plasma may be uninformative.
“which suggests that the absence of T790M in these cases may be uninformative given the lack of any detectable tumor DNA in the plasma.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSION
A single tumor biopsy may not be representative of the entire resistant cancer.
“Resistant cancers are inherently more heterogeneous than treatment-naïve cancers and, therefore, a single tumor biopsy may not be representative of the entire resistant cancer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Resistant cancers are inherently more heterogeneous than treatment-naïve cancers.
- Study design and conductreasoning§ DISCUSSION
The study population is not fully representative of all patients with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance given the intentional enrichment for T790M-positive patients.
“The study population is also not fully representative of all patients with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance given the intentional enrichment for T790M-positive patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ DISCUSSION
Other plasma assays have similarly identified unexpected false-positives for T790M in the absence of false-positives for other mutations.
“Other plasma assays have similarly identified unexpected false-positives for T790M in the absence of false-positives for other mutations.25”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] 25. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0173. Sacher AG, Paweletz C, Dahlberg SE, et al: Prospective Validation of Rapid Plasma Genotyping for the Detection of EGFR and KRAS Mutations in Advanced Lung Cancer. JAMA Oncol 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0173 [epub ahead of print on April 7, 2016] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Articles from Journal of Clinical Oncology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Clinical Oncology
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSION
These data support the use of both plasma- and tissue-based assays for T790M genotyping.
“In conclusion, these data support the use of both plasma- and tissue-based assays for T790M genotyping.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSION
If plasma genotype is positive for T790M, this may obviate the need for a biopsy.
“If plasma genotype is positive for T790M, this may obviate the need for a biopsy—this predicts for excellent outcomes on osimertinib (ORR, 63%; median PFS, 9.7 months), similar to that observed when treating with osimertinib on the basis of tumor genotyping results (ORR, 62%; median PFS, 9.7 months).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSION
Our results highlight the challenge of identifying a reference standard for development of new genotyping assays for drug resistance.
“Our results highlight the challenge of identifying a reference standard for development of new genotyping assays for drug resistance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSION
Favorable clinical outcomes in patients with T790M-negative/sens-negative plasma results could be related, in part, to lack of detectable tumor DNA in the plasma, suggesting lower disease burden or less aggressive disease.
“Favorable clinical outcomes in this patient subset could be related, in part, to lack of detectable tumor DNA in the plasma, which suggests a lower disease burden or less aggressive disease state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSION
When no sensitizing mutation is detected in patients with known EGFR-mutant lung cancer and acquired resistance, plasma genotyping for T790M becomes uninformative.
“With such a mixed outcome as this, tumor genotyping of T790M is needed to identify candidates for osimertinib; however, when no sensitizing mutation is detected in patients with known EGFR-mutant lung cancer and acquired resistance, plasma genotyping for T790M becomes uninformative.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 21
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 8
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ DISCUSSIONIn patients treated with osimertinib on the basis of T790M-positive tumor genotyping, the ORR was 62% and median PFS was 9.7 months.
“If plasma genotype is positive for T790M, this may obviate the need for a biopsy—this predicts for excellent outcomes on osimertinib (ORR, 63%; median PFS, 9.7 months), similar to that observed when treating with osimertinib on the basis of tumor genotyping results (ORR, 62%; median PFS, 9.7 months).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ DISCUSSIONIn patients with T790M-positive plasma genotyping treated with osimertinib, the ORR was 63% and median PFS was 9.7 months.
“If plasma genotype is positive for T790M, this may obviate the need for a biopsy—this predicts for excellent outcomes on osimertinib (ORR, 63%; median PFS, 9.7 months), similar to that observed when treating with osimertinib on the basis of tumor genotyping results (ORR, 62%; median PFS, 9.7 months).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSMedian PFS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 10.9 months) in patients with T790M-negative plasma genotyping, not significantly lower than in patients with T790M-positive plasma (P = .188).
“median PFS was not significantly lower in those with T790M-negative plasma genotyping (8.2 months; 95% CI, 5.3 to 10.9 months; P = .188; Fig 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSORR was 64% (21 of 33; 95% CI, 45% to 79%) in patients with T790M-negative plasma and no detectable EGFR mutations, higher than in those with detectable TKI-sensitive EGFR mutation (P = .019).
“In contrast, in 33 patients with no EGFR mutations detected (T790M negative/sens negative), ORR was higher at 64% (21 of 33; 95% CI, 45% to 79%; P = .019)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSMedian PFS was 9.7 months (95% CI, 8.3 to 11.1 months) in patients positive for T790M in plasma, similar to outcomes in patients positive for T790M on tumor biopsy.
“a 9.7-month median PFS (95% CI, 8.3 to 11.1 months; Fig 3B), which is similar to outcomes in patients positive for T790M on tumor biopsy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSORR was 46% (47 of 102; 95% CI, 36% to 56%) in patients with T790M-negative plasma genotyping, lower than in patients with T790M-positive plasma (P = .011).
“ORR was surprisingly high at 46% (47 of 102; 95% CI, 36% to 56%) in patients with T790M-negative plasma genotyping; however, this was still lower than in patients with T790M-positive plasma (P = .011; Fig 2D)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSMedian PFS was 15.2 months (95% CI, 11.0 to 17.9 months) in patients with T790M-negative plasma and no detectable EGFR mutations, longer than in those with detectable TKI-sensitive EGFR mutation (P = .002).
“and median PFS was longer at 15.2 months (95% CI, 11.0 to 17.9 months; P = .002; Appendix Fig A3)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ RESULTSORR was 62% (108 of 173; 95% CI, 54% to 70%) in patients with T790M-positive tumors, higher than the 26% ORR (15 of 58; 95% CI, 15% to 39%; P < .001) in patients with T790M-negative tumors.
“ORR was 62% (108 of 173; 95% CI, 54% to 70%) in patients with T790M-positive tumors, higher than the 26% ORR (15 of 58; 95% CI, 15% to 39%; P < .001) in patients with T790M-negative tumors”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ DISCUSSIONIn patients with T790M-negative/sens-positive plasma genotyping, ORR to osimertinib was 38% and median PFS was 4.4 months.
“In patients with T790M-negative/sens-positive plasma genotyping, ORR to osimertinib was 38% and median PFS was 4.4 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ DISCUSSIONThose 18 patients with T790M-positive plasma and T790M-negative tumor genotyping had a response rate of 28% (5 of 18) and median PFS of 4.2 months.
“Of 164 patients from this study with T790M-positive plasma genotyping, 18 had T790M-negative tumor genotyping, presumably as a result of heterogeneous presence of resistance mutation as a minor clone, and these patients had a response rate of 28% (5 of 18) and median PFS of 4.2 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ DISCUSSIONIn patients with T790M-negative/sens-negative plasma results, high ORR and prolonged PFS was observed.
“In patients with T790M-negative/sens-negative plasma results, high ORR and prolonged PFS was observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ INTRODUCTIONThird-generation mutant-selective EGFR-TKIs have activity against cells that harbor TKI-sensitive EGFR mutations, and this activity is maintained in the presence of the T790M resistance mutation.
“Standard of care is rapidly changing with the development of third-generation, mutant-selective EGFR-TKIs that have activity against cells that harbor TKI-sensitive EGFR mutations. Unlike conventional EGFR-TKIs, this activity is maintained in the presence of T790M resistance mutation.8,9”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSIONPlasma and tumor genotyping can have complementary roles for T790M testing, with plasma genotyping as the initial step and tumor biopsy as supplementary.
“Our data suggest that plasma and tumor genotyping can have complementary roles for T790M testing, where plasma genotyping could be the initial step and a biopsy for tumor genotyping could be supplementary (Fig 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ INTRODUCTIONTumor genotyping for EGFR T790M requires a biopsy after resistance develops, which carries risks, can delay subsequent therapy, and may not always be feasible.
“This represents a clinical challenge because tumor genotyping for EGFR T790M requires a biopsy to be performed after resistance develops, which is a procedure that carries risks, can delay subsequent therapy, and may not always be feasible.18”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ INTRODUCTIONAt least five third-generation EGFR-TKIs are in clinical development, and all have reported objective response rates exceeding 45% in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and T790M-positive resistance.
“At least five third-generation EGFR-TKIs are in clinical development (rociletinib, osimertinib, HM61713/BI1482694, ASP8273, and EGF816) and all have reported objective response rates (ORRs) that exceed 45% in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and T790M-positive resistance.12-16”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ RESULTSHeterogeneous presence of resistance mutations across disease sites, and not false positives of the BEAMing assay, account for the majority of T790M tissue-plasma discordance.
“which suggests that heterogeneous presence of resistance mutations across disease sites, and not false-positives of the BEAMing assay, account for the majority of T790M tissue–plasma discordance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ INTRODUCTIONPlasma genotyping for EGFR-sensitizing mutations is an established alternative in Europe when tumor genotyping is not feasible.
“Noninvasive genotyping of cell-free plasma DNA (cfDNA) represents an attractive alternative for detection of EGFR T790M, noting that plasma genotyping for EGFR-sensitizing mutations is an established alternative in Europe when tumor genotyping is not feasible.19”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ INTRODUCTIONAcquired resistance to conventional EGFR-TKIs develops after a median of 10 to 12 months and is most commonly mediated by an acquired T790M mutation.
“Resistance to conventional EGFR-TKIs develops after a median of 10 to 12 months and is most commonly mediated by an acquired mutation, T790M1-5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSIONGiven the ease and reduced risk of plasma analysis compared with an invasive biopsy procedure, data support a new paradigm for resistance management, with rapid plasma genotyping as a diagnostic option before undergoing a tumor biopsy.
“Given the ease and reduced risk of plasma analysis compared with an invasive biopsy procedure, data support a new paradigm for resistance management, with rapid plasma genotyping as a diagnostic option before undergoing a tumor biopsy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoning§ DISCUSSIONThis analysis was not a preplanned analysis.
“Whereas it is a large analysis of a prospective dataset, it was not a preplanned analysis, in part because of the rapid evolution of plasma genotyping technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ DISCUSSIONDespite discordance, outcomes in patients with T790M-positive plasma are similar to outcomes of patients with T790M-positive tumors, which highlights that a single tumor biopsy may not be representative of the spatial heterogeneity of resistant lung cancer.
“Despite this discordance, outcomes in patients with T790M-positive plasma are similar to outcomes of patients with T790M-positive tumors, which highlights that a single tumor biopsy may not be representative of the spatial heterogeneity of resistant lung cancer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Resistant cancers are inherently more heterogeneous than treatment-naïve cancers.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ DISCUSSIONBEAMing was not performed under Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments conditions; this analysis used an investigational assay identical to the commercially available BEAMing assay.
“Lastly, BEAMing was not performed under Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments conditions; this analysis used an investigational assay that is identical to the commercially available BEAMing assay.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSIONIn a setting in which it is unclear whether tumor genotyping is representative of the entirety of the disease, clinical outcome will be the best reference standard for development of a noninvasive assay.
“In a setting in which it is unclear whether tumor genotyping is representative of the entirety of the disease, clinical outcome will be the best reference standard for development of a noninvasive assay.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Resistant cancers are inherently more heterogeneous than treatment-naïve cancers.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSIONPatients negative for T790M in plasma should undergo a biopsy to determine T790M status because of the risks of false-negative plasma results.
“Patients negative for T790M in plasma, however, should undergo a biopsy to determine T790M status because of the risks of false-negative plasma results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSIONBiopsy to further investigate T790M-positive tumor tissue is warranted in patients with T790M-negative plasma.
“As the plasma T790M-negative population is a mixture of true and false negatives, biopsy to further investigate the presence of T790M-positive tumor tissue is warranted (Fig 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ DISCUSSIONIn this example, approximately 54% of resistant patients would be T790M positive in plasma and could potentially avoid a biopsy.
“In this example, approximately 54% of resistant patients would be T790M positive in plasma and, if treated on the basis of that result, could potentially avoid a biopsy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Resistant cancers are inherently more heterogeneous than treatment-naïve cancers.
“Resistant cancers are inherently more heterogeneous than treatment-naïve cancers and, therefore, a single tumor biopsy may not be representative of the entire resistant cancer.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The BEAMing assay has negligible false positives for T790M.
“We found that 31% of patients who are negative for T790M on central tumor genotyping have detectable T790M in plasma with a BEAMing assay that otherwise has negligible false positives, though the relative AF of plasma T790M is lower in these patients than in patients with T790M-positive plasma and tumors.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Different median PFS values for the same subgroup
MinorFor patients with T790M-negative plasma but T790M-positive tumors, the Results report a median PFS of 16.5 months, while the Discussion reports 16.2 months.
“ORR was higher in patients with T790M-positive tumors (31 of 45; 69%; 95% CI, 53% to 82%) than in patients with T790M-negative tumors (10 of 40; 25%; 95% CI, 13% to 41%; P < .001), as was median PFS (16.5 months v 2.8 months; P < .001; Fig 3C).”
“Of 102 patients from this study with T790M-negative plasma, 45 had tumor genotyping that was positive for T790M, and these patients had a median PFS of 16.2 months, whereas 40 patients had tumor genotyping that was negative for T790M and a median PFS of 2.8 months.”
Response-evaluable count presented as the plasma-positive cohort size
MinorThe Results say that 164 of the 271 plasma-genotyped patients were T790M positive, but Table A1 lists 167. The 164 figure is the denominator used for ORR, not the tabulated size of the plasma-positive cohort.
“Of 271 patients with plasma genotyping, 164 were positive for T790M in plasma and displayed a 63% ORR (103 of 164; 95% CI, 55% to 70%; Fig 2C)”
“Central (plasma) T790M mutation, No. (%) Positive 167 (54.2) 129 (54.4) 167 (61.6) 129 (59.7) Negative 104 (33.8) 87 (36.7) 104 (38.4) 87 (40.3)”
Incorrect percentage for the 80 mg tumor-genotyping subgroup
MinorTable A1 reports 90 patients at 80 mg among 237 patients with central tumor genotyping. That is 38.0%, not 40.0%.
Reported 40 · recomputed 37.974684
“Osimertinib dose, No. (%) 20 mg 21 (6.8) 13 (5.5) 21 (7.7) 13 (6.0) 40 mg 52 (16.9) 43 (18.1) 52 (19.2) 43 (20.0) 80 mg 126 (40.9) 90 (40.0) 108 (39.9) 88 (40.7)”
Cites
Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Thongprasert, S., Yang, C.-H., Chu, D.-T., Saijo, N., Sunpaweravong, P., Han, B., Margono, B., Ichinose, Y., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810699 · Cited by 8,261 · see citing works
Self-citationRosell, R., Carcereny, E., Gervais, R., Vergnenegre, A., Massuti, B., Felip, E., Palmero, R., Garcia-Gomez, R., Pallares, C., Sanchez, J. M., et al. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70393-x · Cited by 5,489 · see citing works
Genotypic and Histological Evolution of Lung Cancers Acquiring Resistance to EGFR Inhibitors
Sequist, L. V., Waltman, B. A., Dias-Santagata, D., Digumarthy, S., Turke, A. B., Fidias, P., Bergethon, K., Shaw, A. T., Gettinger, S., Cosper, A. K., et al. (2011) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002003 · Cited by 3,499 · see citing works
Sequist, L. V., Yang, J. C.-H., Yamamoto, N., O'Byrne, K., Hirsh, V., Mok, T., Geater, S. L., Orlov, S., Tsai, C.-M., Boyer, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.44.2806 · Cited by 3,228 · see citing works
Self-citationCross, D. A. E., Ashton, S. E., Ghiorghiu, S., Eberlein, C., Nebhan, C. A., Spitzler, P. J., Orme, J. P., Finlay, M. R. V., Ward, R. A., Mellor, M. J., et al. (2014) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-14-0337 · Cited by 2,246 · see citing works
Self-citationAZD9291 in EGFR Inhibitor–Resistant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Jänne, P. A., Yang, J. C.-H., Kim, D.-W., Planchard, D., Ohe, Y., Ramalingam, S. S., Ahn, M.-J., Kim, S.-W., Su, W.-C., Horn, L., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1411817 · Cited by 2,116 · see citing works
Self-citationNovel mutant-selective EGFR kinase inhibitors against EGFR T790M
Zhou, W., Ercan, D., Chen, L., Yun, C.-H., Li, D., Capelletti, M., Cortot, A. B., Chirieac, L., Iacob, R. E., Padera, R., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08622 · Cited by 1,013 · see citing works
Oxnard, G. R., Paweletz, C. P., Kuang, Y., Mach, S. L., O'Connell, A., Messineo, M. M., Luke, J. J., Butaney, M., Kirschmeier, P., Jackman, D. M., et al. (2014) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-2482 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Self-citationRociletinib in <i>EGFR</i>-Mutated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Sequist, L. V., Soria, J.-C., Goldman, J. W., Wakelee, H. A., Gadgeel, S. M., Varga, A., Papadimitrakopoulou, V., Solomon, B. J., Oxnard, G. R., Dziadziuszko, R., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1413654 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Self-citationFinlay, M. R. V., Anderton, M., Ashton, S., Ballard, P., Bethel, P. A., Box, M. R., Bradbury, R. H., Brown, S. J., Butterworth, S., Campbell, A., et al. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm500973a · Cited by 636 · see citing works
Arcila, M. E., Oxnard, G. R., Nafa, K., Riely, G. J., Solomon, S. B., Zakowski, M. F., Kris, M. G., Pao, W., Miller, V. A., & Ladanyi, M. (2011) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-2277 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Self-citationSacher, A. G., Paweletz, C. P., Dahlberg, S. E., Alden, R. S., O’Connell, A., Feeney, N. B., Mach, S. L., Janne, P. A., & Oxnard, G. R. (2016) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0173 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
Self-citationThress, K. S., Brant, R., Carr, T. H., Dearden, S. P., Jenkins, S. C., Brown, H. J., Hammett, T., Cantarini, M., & Barrett, J. C. (2015) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.10.004 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Self-citationDouillard, J.-Y., Ostoros, G., Cobo, M., Ciuleanu, T., Cole, R., McWalter, G., Walker, J., Dearden, S., Webster, A., Milenkova, T., et al. (2014) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0000000000000263 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Soria, J.-C., Wu, Y.-L., Nakagawa, K., Kim, S.-W., Yang, J.-J., Ahn, M.-J., Wang, J., Yang, J. C.-H., Lu, Y., Atagi, S., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00121-7 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Self-citationOxnard, G. R., Arcila, M. E., Chmielecki, J., Ladanyi, M., Miller, V. A., & Pao, W. J. (2011) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-2571 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Self-citationWard, R. A., Anderton, M. J., Ashton, S., Bethel, P. A., Box, M., Butterworth, S., Colclough, N., Chorley, C. G., Chuaqui, C., Cross, D. A. E., et al. (2013) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm400822z · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Luo, J., Shen, L., & Zheng, D. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep06269 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Park, K., Lee, J.-S., Lee, K. H., Kim, J.-H., Min, Y. J., Choi, Y., Han, J., Kim, B.-S., Kim, J.-S., Lee, K. H., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.8084 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Pasquale, R., Fenizia, F., Abate, R. E., Sacco, A., Esposito, C., Forgione, L., Rachiglio, A. M., Bevilacqua, S., Montanino, A., Franco, R., et al. (2015) · Pharmacogenomics · doi:10.2217/pgs.15.45 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Tan, D. S.-W., Seto, T., Leighl, N. B., Riely, G. J., Sequist, L. V. D., Felip, E., Wolf, J., Yang, J. C., Matushansky, I., Yu, X., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.8013 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationMurakami, H., Nokihara, H., Shimizu, T., Seto, T., Keating, A., Krivoshik, A., Uegaki, K., Morita, S., Nakagawa, K., & Fukuoka, M. (2014) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(14)70730-0 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Redig, A. J., Taibi, M., Oxnard, G. R., Boucher, D. H., Rabin, M. S., Marcoux, J. P., Gandhi, L., Huberman, M. S., Rangachari, D., Lucca, J. V., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.8076 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The biology and management of non-small cell lung cancer
Herbst, R. S., Morgensztern, D., & Boshoff, C. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25183 · Cited by 4,891 · see citing works
Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies
Dagogo-Jack, I., & Shaw, A. T. (2018) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.166 · Cited by 3,846 · see citing works
Osimertinib or Platinum–Pemetrexed in <i>EGFR</i> T790M–Positive Lung Cancer
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Ahn, M.-J., Garassino, M. C., Kim, H. R., Ramalingam, S. S., Shepherd, F. A., He, Y., Akamatsu, H., Theelen, W. S. M. E., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1612674 · Cited by 3,379 · see citing works
Liquid biopsies come of age: Towards implementation of circulating tumour DNA
Wan, J. C. M., Massie, C., Garcia-Corbacho, J., Mouliere, F., Brenton, J. D., Caldas, C., Pacey, S., Baird, R., & Rosenfeld, N. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2017.7 · Cited by 2,809 · see citing works
Thai, A. A., Solomon, B., Sequist, L. V. D., Gainor, J. F., & Heist, R. S. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00312-3 · Cited by 2,629 · see citing works
Integrating liquid biopsies into the management of cancer
Siravegna, G., Marsoni, S., Siena, S., & Bardelli, A. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.14 · Cited by 1,941 · see citing works
Current and future perspectives of liquid biopsies in genomics-driven oncology
Heitzer, E., Haque, I. S., Roberts, C. E. S., & Speicher, M. R. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0071-5 · Cited by 1,557 · see citing works
Resistance mechanisms to osimertinib in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer
Leonetti, A., Sharma, S., Minari, R., Perego, P., Giovannetti, E., & Tiseo, M. (2019) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-019-0573-8 · Cited by 1,446 · see citing works
Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Ettinger, D. S., Wood, D. E., Aisner, D. L., Akerley, W., Bauman, J. R., Bharat, A., Bruno, D. S., Chang, J. Y., Chirieac, L. R., D’Amico, T. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2022.0025 · Cited by 1,405 · see citing works
Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 5.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Ettinger, D. S., Wood, D. E., Aisner, D. L., Akerley, W., Bauman, J. R., Chirieac, L. R., D’Amico, T. A., DeCamp, M. M., Dilling, T. J., Dobelbower, M. C., et al. (2017) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2017.0050 · Cited by 1,305 · see citing works
Merker, J. D., Oxnard, G. R., Compton, C., Diehn, M., Hurley, P., Lazar, A. J., Lindeman, N., Lockwood, C. M., Rai, A. J., Schilsky, R. L., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2017.76.8671 · Cited by 959 · see citing works
Self-citationApplication of Cell-free DNA Analysis to Cancer Treatment
Corcoran, R. B., & Chabner, B. A. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1706174 · Cited by 965 · see citing works
Lindeman, N. I., Cagle, P. T., Aisner, D. L., Arcila, M. E., Beasley, M. B., Bernicker, E., Colasacco, C., Đačić, S., Hirsch, F. R., Kerr, K. M., et al. (2018) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/arpa.2017-0388-cp · Cited by 959 · see citing works
Hendriks, L. E. L., Kerr, K. M., Menis, J., Mok, T. S. K., Nestle, U., Passaro, A., Peters, S., Planchard, D., Smit, E. F., Solomon, B., et al. (2023) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.12.009 · Cited by 877 · see citing works
Wu, S., & Shih, J. (2018) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-018-0777-1 · Cited by 788 · see citing works
Mechanisms of acquired resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Westover, D., Zugazagoitia, J., Cho, B. C., Lovly, C. M., & Paz-Ares, L. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx703 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
Oxnard, G. R., Hu, Y., Mileham, K. F., Husain, H., Costa, D. B., Tracy, P., Feeney, N., Sholl, L. M., Dahlberg, S. E., Redig, A. J., et al. (2018) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2969 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Self-citationLiquid Biopsy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Statement Paper from the IASLC
Rolfo, C. D., Mack, P. C., Scagliotti, G. V., Baas, P., Barlési, F., Bivona, T. G., Herbst, R. S., Mok, T. S. K., Peled, N., Pirker, R., et al. (2018) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2018.05.030 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Lindeman, N. I., Cagle, P. T., Aisner, D. L., Arcila, M. E., Beasley, M. B., Bernicker, E., Colasacco, C., Đačić, S., Hirsch, F. R., Kerr, K. M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2017.12.001 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Burstein, H. J., Krilov, L., Aragon‐Ching, J. B., Baxter, N. N., Chiorean, E. G., Chow, W. A., Groot, J. F. D., Devine, S. M., DuBois, S. G., El‐Deiry, W. S., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.71.5292 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Yang, J. C.-H., Ahn, M.-J., Kim, D.-W., Ramalingam, S. S., Sequist, L. V., Su, W.-C., Kim, S.-W., Kim, J.-H., Planchard, D., Felip, E., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.70.3223 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Self-citationThe emerging role of cell-free DNA as a molecular marker for cancer management
Bronkhorst, A. J., Ungerer, V., & Holdenrieder, S. (2019) · Biomolecular Detection and Quantification · doi:10.1016/j.bdq.2019.100087 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Next-generation sequencing in liquid biopsy: cancer screening and early detection
Chen, M., & Zhao, H. (2019) · Human Genomics · doi:10.1186/s40246-019-0220-8 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Osimertinib As First-Line Treatment of EGFR Mutation–Positive Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Ramalingam, S. S., Yang, J. C., Lee, C. K., Kurata, T., Kim, D., John, T., Nogami, N., Ohe, Y., Mann, H., Rukazenkov, Y., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2017.74.7576 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Self-citationTargeting ALK: Precision Medicine Takes on Drug Resistance
Lin, J. J., Riely, G. J., & Shaw, A. T. (2017) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-16-1123 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
New and emerging targeted treatments in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Hirsch, F. R., Suda, K., Wiens, J., & Bunn, P. A. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31473-8 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Aggarwal, C., Thompson, J. C., Black, T. A., Katz, S. I., Fan, R., Yee, S. S., Chien, A. L., Evans, T. L., Bauml, J. M., Alley, E. W., et al. (2018) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4305 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
False-Positive Plasma Genotyping Due to Clonal Hematopoiesis
Hu, Y., Ulrich, B. C., Supplee, J., Kuang, Y., Lizotte, P. H., Feeney, N. B., Guibert, N. M., Awad, M. M., Wong, K., Janne, P. A., et al. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0143 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Self-citationShaw, A. T., Solomon, B., Besse, B., Bauer, T. M., Lin, C., Soo, R. A., Riely, G. J., Ou, S. I., Clancy, J. S., Li, S., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.18.02236 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Techniques of using circulating tumor DNA as a liquid biopsy component in cancer management
Elazezy, M., & Joosse, S. (2018) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2018.10.002 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Liquid Biopsy-Based Biomarkers of Treatment Response and Resistance
Kilgour, E., Rothwell, D. G., Brady, G., & Dive, C. (2020) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.012 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Lindeman, N. I., Cagle, P. T., Aisner, D. L., Arcila, M. E., Beasley, M. B., Bernicker, E., Colasacco, C., Đačić, S., Hirsch, F. R., Kerr, K. M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.11.004 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Xu, L., Wang, H., Chu, Z., Cai, L., Shi, H., Zhu, C., Pan, D., Pan, J. H., Fei, X., & Lei, Y. (2020) · ACS Applied Polymer Materials · doi:10.1021/acsapm.9b01051 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Song, P., Wu, L. R., Yan, Y. H., Zhang, J. X., Chu, T., Kwong, L. N., Patel, A. A., & Zhang, D. Y. (2022) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-021-00837-3 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Detecting Liquid Remnants of Solid Tumors: Circulating Tumor DNA Minimal Residual Disease
Moding, E. J., Nabet, B. Y., Alizadeh, A. A., & Diehn, M. (2021) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0634 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Osimertinib and other third-generation EGFR TKI in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients
Remón, J., Steuer, C. E., Ramalingam, S. S., & Felip, E. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx704 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Circulating tumour DNA — looking beyond the blood
Tivey, A., Church, M., Rothwell, D., Dive, C., & Cook, N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-022-00660-y · Cited by 321 · see citing works
ERS/EACTS statement on the management of malignant pleural effusions
Bibby, A. C., Dorn, P., Psallidas, I., Porcel, J. M., Janssen, J. P., Froudarakis, Μ. E., Subotic, D. R., Astoul, P., Licht, P. B., Schmid, R. A., et al. (2018) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.00349-2018 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Gorgannezhad, L., Umer, M., Islam, M. N., Nguyen, N., & Shiddiky, M. J. A. (2018) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c8lc00100f · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Genomic Heterogeneity as a Barrier to Precision Medicine in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Pectasides, E., Stachler, M. D., Derks, S., Liu, Y., Maron, S., Islam, M., Alpert, L., Kwak, H., Kindler, H., Polite, B., et al. (2018) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-0395 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Krug, A. K., Enderle, D., Karlovich, C., Priewasser, T., Bentink, S., Spiel, A., Brinkmann, K., Emenegger, J., Grimm, D. G., Castellanos-Rizaldos, E., et al. (2017) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx765 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Jenkins, S., Yang, J. C.-H., Ramalingam, S. S., Yu, K., Patel, S., Weston, S., Hodge, R., Cantarini, M., Jänne, P. A., Mitsudomi, T., et al. (2017) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2017.04.003 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Self-citationTumor cell plasticity in targeted therapy-induced resistance: Mechanisms and new strategies
Shi, Z.-D., Pang, K., Wu, Z.-X., Dong, Y., Hao, L., Qin, J.-X., Wang, W., Chen, Z.-S., & Han, C.-H. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01383-x · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Rodak, O., Peris‐Díaz, M. D., Olbromski, M., Podhorska‐Okołów, M., & Dzięgiel, P. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13184705 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Clinical cancer genomic profiling
Chakravarty, D., & Solit, D. B. (2021) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-021-00338-8 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Merker, J. D., Oxnard, G. R., Compton, C. C., Diehn, M., Hurley, P. A., Lazar, A. J., Lindeman, N. I., Lockwood, C. M., Rai, A. J., Schilsky, R. L., et al. (2018) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/arpa.2018-0901-sa · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Self-citationGelatti, A., Drilon, A. E. D. C., & Santini, F. C. (2019) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.09.017 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Exosome-Based Detection of EGFR T790M in Plasma from Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Castellanos-Rizaldos, E., Grimm, D. G., Tadigotla, V. R., Hurley, J. D., Healy, J., Neal, P. L., Sher, M., Venkatesan, R., Karlovich, C., Raponi, M., et al. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-3369 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Gutierrez, M. E., Choi, K., Lanman, R. B., Licitra, E. J., Skrzypczak, S. M., Benito, R. P., Wu, T., Arunajadai, S. G., Kaur, S., Harper, H. D., et al. (2017) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2017.04.004 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Volckmar, A., Sültmann, H., Riediger, A. L., Fioretos, T., Schirmacher, P., Endris, V., Stenzinger, A., & Dietz, S. (2017) · Genes Chromosomes and Cancer · doi:10.1002/gcc.22517 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
ESMO expert consensus statements on the management of EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer
Passaro, A., Leighl, N. B., Blackhall, F. H., Popat, S., Kerr, K. M., Ahn, M., Arcila, M. E., Arrieta, O. G., Planchard, D., de Marinis, F., et al. (2022) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.003 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Self-citationCurrent and Emerging Applications of Droplet Digital PCR in Oncology
Olmedillas-López, S., García-Arranz, M., & García-Olmo, D. (2017) · Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40291-017-0278-8 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Advanced liquid biopsy technologies for circulating biomarker detection
Soda, N., Rehm, B. H. A., Sonar, P. M., Nguyen, N., & Shiddiky, M. J. A. (2019) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/c9tb01490j · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Santoni‐Rugiu, E., Melchior, L. C., Urbanska, E. M., Jakobsen, J. N., de Stricker, K., Grauslund, M., & Sørensen, J. B. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11070923 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Overall survival with circulating tumor DNA-guided therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Jee, J., Lebow, E. S., Yeh, R., Das, J. P., Namakydoust, A., Paik, P. K., Chaft, J. E., Jayakumaran, G., Brannon, A. R., Benayed, R., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-02047-z · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Circulating tumor DNA in advanced solid tumors: Clinical relevance and future directions
Cheng, M. L., Pectasides, E., Hanna, G. J., Parsons, H. A., Choudhury, A. D., & Oxnard, G. R. (2020) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21650 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Self-citationNan, X., Xie, C., Yu, X., & Liu, J. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.20095 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Detection of Solid Tumor Molecular Residual Disease (MRD) Using Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA)
Chin, R.-I., Chen, K., Usmani, A., Chua, C., Harris, P. K., Binkley, M. S., Azad, T. D., Dudley, J. C., & Chaudhuri, A. A. (2019) · Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40291-019-00390-5 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Emerging Treatment Paradigms for EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancers Progressing on Osimertinib: A Review
Piper‐Vallillo, A. J., Sequist, L. V. D., & Piotrowska, Z. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.03123 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Mok, T. S. K., Kim, S., Wu, Y.-L. L. C., Nakagawa, K., Yang, J., Ahn, M., Wang, J., Yang, J. C., Lü, Y., Atagi, S., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2017.73.9250 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Self-citationMack, P. C., Banks, K. C., Espenschied, C. R., Burich, R. A., Zill, O. A., Lee, C. E., Riess, J. W., Mortimer, S., Talasaz, A. H., Lanman, R. B., et al. (2020) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.32876 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Profile of the Roche cobas® EGFR mutation test v2 for non-small cell lung cancer
Malapelle, U., Sirera, R., Lewintre, E. J., Reclusa, P., Fariñas, S. C., Blasco, A., Pisapia, P., Rolfo, C. D., & Camps, C. (2017) · Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1080/14737159.2017.1288568 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
BRAF in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Pickaxing another brick in the wall
Leonetti, A., Facchinetti, F., Rossi, G., Minari, R., Conti, A., Friboulet, L., Tiseo, M., & Planchard, D. (2018) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.04.006 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Remón, J., Caramella, C., Jovelet, C., Lacroix, L., Lawson, A. R. J., Smalley, S., Howarth, K., Gale, D. G., Green, E., Plagnol, V., et al. (2017) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx017 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Molecular biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma
Calvayrac, O., Pradines, A., Tostivint, E. P., Mazières, J., & Guibert, N. M. (2017) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.01734-2016 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Li, B. T., Jankú, F., Jung, B. K., Hou, C., Madwani, K., Alden, R. S., Razavi, P., Reis-Filho, J. S., Shen, R., Isbell, J. M., et al. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz046 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationRicordel, C., Friboulet, L., Facchinetti, F., & Soria, J. (2017) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx705 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Han, B., Tjulandin, S., Hagiwara, K., Normanno, N., Wulandari, L., Лактионов, К. К., Hudoyo, A., He, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, M.-Z., et al. (2017) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.08.021 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Personalized therapy for lung cancer: striking a moving target
Pakkala, S., & Ramalingam, S. S. (2018) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.120858 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Lin, C.-C., Shih, J.-Y., Yu, C.-J., Ho, C.-C., Liao, W.-Y., Lee, J.-H., Tsai, T.-H., Su, K.-Y., Hsieh, M.-S., Chang, Y.-L., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30480-0 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Self-citationMolecular Diagnostics in Clinical Oncology
Соколенко, А. П., & Имянитов, Е. Н. (2018) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2018.00076 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Next Generation Sequencing for Gene Fusion Analysis in Lung Cancer: A Literature Review
Bruno, R., & Fontanini, G. (2020) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics10080521 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Lee, K. H. (2017) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.001 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Strategies for the successful implementation of plasma-based NSCLC genotyping in clinical practice
Aggarwal, C., Rolfo, C. D., Oxnard, G. R., Gray, J. E., Sholl, L. M., & Gandara, D. R. (2020) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-020-0423-x · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citationCancer Diagnosis Using a Liquid Biopsy: Challenges and Expectations
Castro-Giner, F., Gkountela, S., Donato, C., Alborelli, I., Quagliata, L., Ng, C. K. Y., Piscuoglio, S., & Aceto, N. (2018) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics8020031 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Rolfo, C. D., Cardona, A. F., Cristofanilli, M., Paz-Ares, L. G., Díaz‐Mochon, J. J., Durán, I., Raez, L. E., Russo, A., Lorente, J. A., Malapelle, U., et al. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102978 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Normanno, N., Denis, M. G., Thress, K. S., Ratcliffe, M., & Reck, M. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.13915 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationGuibert, N. M., Hu, Y., Feeney, N. B., Kuang, Y., Plagnol, V., Jones, G. R., Howarth, K., Beeler, J. F., Paweletz, C. P., & Oxnard, G. R. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy005 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationDagogo‐Jack, I., Brannon, A. R., Ferris, L. A., Campbell, C. D., Lin, J. J., Schultz, K. R., Ackil, J., Stevens, S. E., Dardaei, L., Yoda, S., et al. (2018) · JCO Precision Oncology · doi:10.1200/po.17.00160 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Gray, J. E., Okamoto, I., Sriuranpong, V., Vansteenkiste, J., Imamura, F., Lee, J. S., Pang, Y., Cobo, M., Kasahara, K., Cheng, Y., et al. (2019) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1126 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Guibert, N. M., Pradines, A., Favre, G., & Mazières, J. (2020) · European Respiratory Review · doi:10.1183/16000617.0052-2019 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Alborelli, I., Generali, D., Jermann, P. M., Cappelletti, M. R., Ferrero, G., Scaggiante, B., Bortul, M., Zanconati, F., Nicolet, S., Haegele, J., et al. (2019) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-019-1770-3 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
ERS/EACTS statement on the management of malignant pleural effusions
Bibby, A. C., Dorn, P., Psallidas, I., Porcel, J. M., Janssen, J. P., Froudarakis, Μ. E., Subotic, D. R., Astoul, P., Licht, P. B., Schmid, R. A., et al. (2018) · European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezy258 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Liquid Biopsy in Clinical Management of Breast, Lung, and Colorectal Cancer
Hench, I. B., Hench, J., & Tolnay, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2018.00009 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Molecular testing strategies in non-small cell lung cancer: optimizing the diagnostic journey
Gregg, J. P., Li, T., & Yoneda, K. Y. (2019) · Translational Lung Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tlcr.2019.04.14 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Pinzani, P., D’Argenio, V., Re, M. D., Pellegrini, C., Cucchiara, F., Salvianti, F., & Galbiati, S. (2021) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2020-1685 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
König, D., Prince, S. S., & Rothschild, S. I. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13040804 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Pisapia, P., Malapelle, U., & Troncone, G. (2018) · Acta Cytologica · doi:10.1159/000492710 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Gao, J., Li, H.-R., Jin, C., Jiang, J., & Ding, J. (2019) · Clinical & Translational Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12094-019-02075-1 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Circulating cell-free DNA for non-invasive cancer management
Stewart, C. M., & Tsui, D. W. Y. (2018) · Cancer Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.cancergen.2018.02.005 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Dong, J., Li, B., Lin, D. C.-C., Zhou, Q., & Huang, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.00230 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Third generation EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC: Where are we now and where are we going
Russo, A., Franchina, T., Ricciardi, G. R. R., Smiroldo, V., Picciotto, M., Zanghì, M., Rolfo, C. D., & Adamo, V. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.07.003 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Written on behalf of AME Lung Cancer Collaborative Group, Song, Y., Hu, C., Xie, Z., Wu, L., Zhu, Z., Rao, C., Liu, L., Chen, Y., Liang, N., et al. (2020) · Translational Lung Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tlcr.2020.03.17 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Hochmair, M. J., Buder, A., Schwab, S., Burghuber, O. C., Prosch, H., Hilbe, W., Cseh, A., Fritz, R., & Filipits, M. (2018) · Targeted Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11523-018-0612-z · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Doucey, M., & Carrara, S. (2018) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.07.014 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Minari, R., Bordi, P., Del Re, M., Facchinetti, F., Mazzoni, F., Barbieri, F., Camerini, A., Comin, C. E., Gnetti, L., Azzoni, C., et al. (2018) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.11.011 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Tellez-Gabriel, M., Knutsen, E., & Perander, M. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21249457 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Husain, H., Pavlick, D. C., Fendler, B. J., Madison, R. W., Decker, B. J., Gjoerup, O. V., Parachoniak, C. A., McLaughlin-Drubin, M., Erlich, R., Schrock, A. B., et al. (2022) · JCO Precision Oncology · doi:10.1200/po.22.00261 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-citationGirard, N. (2018) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2017-0636 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Reita, D., Pabst, L., Pencreach, E., Guérin, É., Dano, L., Rimelen, V., Voegeli, A., Vallat, L. D., Mascaux, C., & Beau‐Faller, M. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13194926 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
- Authors
- Oxnard, G. R., Thress, K. S., Alden, R. S., Lawrance, R., Paweletz, C. P., Cantarini, M., Yang, J. C.-H., Barrett, J. C., & Jänne, P. A.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Ryan S. Alden, Cloud P. Paweletz, and Pasi A. Jänne, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Kenneth S. Thress and J. Carl Barrett, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA; Rachael Lawrance and Mireille Cantarini, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and James Chih-Hsin Yang, National Taiwan University and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2016-10-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 28
- Pages
- 3375-3382
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- PMC
- PMC5035123
- OpenAlex
- W2468983064
- Semantic Scholar
- 120643ae96c264f871673844d9f7ad68e25ce532
- Cited by
- 850
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 120 · 2018: 151 · 2017: 149 · 2016: 18 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 130.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- AstraZeneca
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA135257, U01CA210171)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- osimertinib, T790M mutation, liquid biopsy, plasma cell-free DNA, beaming, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, non-small cell lung cancer, treatment response prediction, false negative rate, tumor biopsy, progression-free survival, objective response rate, first-in-man trial
- MeSH terms
- Acrylamides, Aniline Compounds, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, DNA, Neoplasm, Genotype, Humans, Indoles, Lung Neoplasms, Piperazines, Pyrimidines, Retrospective Studies, Biomarkers, Tumor, Treatment Outcome, Disease-Free Survival, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review