Cited by 390Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Anti-CTLA-4 Immunotherapy Does Not Deplete FOXP3+ Regulatory T Cells (Tregs) in Human Cancers

Open access
Sharma, Anu, Subudhi, Sumit K., Blando, Jorge, Scutti, Jorge, Vence, Luis, Wargo, Jennifer, Allison, James P., Ribas, Antoni +1 more·2019·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: CTLA-4 was the first inhibitory immune checkpoint to be identified. Two mAbs, ipilimumab (IgG1) and tremelimumab (IgG2), which block the function of CTLA-4, have demonstrated durable clinical activity in a subset of patients with advanced solid malignancies by augmenting effector T-cell–mediated immune responses. Studies in mice suggest that anti-CTLA-4 mAbs may also selectively deplete intratumoral FOXP3+ regulatory T cells via an Fc-dependent mechanism. However, it is unclear whether the depletion of FOXP3+ cells occurs in patients with cancer treated with anti-CTLA-4 therapies. Experimental Design: Quantitative IHC was used to evaluate the densities of intratumoral CD4+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ cells in stage-matched melanoma (n = 19), prostate cancer (n = 17), and bladder cancer (n = 9) samples treated with ipilimumab and in paired melanoma tumors (n = 18) treated with tremelimumab. These findings were corroborated with multiparametric mass cytometry analysis of tumor-infiltrating cells from paired fresh melanoma tumors (n = 5) treated with ipilimumab. Results: Both ipilimumab and tremelimumab increase infiltration of intratumoral CD4+ and CD8+ cells without significantly changing or depleting FOXP3+ cells within the tumor microenvironment. Conclusions: Anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy does not deplete FOXP3+ cells in human tumors, which suggests that their efficacy could be enhanced by modifying the Fc portions of the mAbs to enhance Fc-mediated depletion of intratumoral regulatory T cells. See related commentary by Quezada and Peggs, p. 1130

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0762

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anti-CTLA-4 therapy has been somewhat effective in melanoma and several other cancers.

    “Anti-CTLA-4 therapy has been somewhat effective in melanoma and several other cancers, and blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is now first-line therapy for various tumor types, particularly melanoma and non-small cell lung carcinoma, with their combination being superior at the expense of enhanced adverse effects359,360.”

    From TGFβ biology in cancer progression and immunotherapy (2021) · cites this paper as [359]

  • PD-1/PD-L1 blockade is now first-line therapy for various tumor types, particularly melanoma and non-small cell lung carcinoma.

    “Anti-CTLA-4 therapy has been somewhat effective in melanoma and several other cancers, and blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is now first-line therapy for various tumor types, particularly melanoma and non-small cell lung carcinoma, with their combination being superior at the expense of enhanced adverse effects359,360.”

    From TGFβ biology in cancer progression and immunotherapy (2021) · cites this paper as [359]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharma, A., Subudhi, S. K., Blando, J., Scutti, J., Vence, L., Wargo, J., Allison, J. P., Ribas, A., & Sharma, P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Sharma, Padmanee
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2019-02-15
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
1233-1238
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W4253193856
Cited by
382
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 9
FWCI
15.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) (R01 CA1633793)
  • Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF) (2014 Stewart Rahr-PCF Young Investigator)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
CTLA-4, anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy, Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, ipilimumab, tremelimumab, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor microenvironment, melanoma, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, mass cytometry, immune checkpoint blockade
MeSH terms
Ipilimumab, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Male, Melanoma, Prostatic Neoplasms, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Paraffin Embedding, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Cell Lineage, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Tumor Microenvironment, CTLA-4 Antigen, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review