Cited by 106Prostate Cancer Treatment and ResearchAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Proteome of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis Reveals Heterogeneity with Prognostic Implications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: Bone is the most predominant site of distant metastasis in prostate cancer, and patients have limited therapeutic options at this stage. Experimental Design: We performed a system-wide quantitative proteomic analysis of bone metastatic prostate tumors from 22 patients operated to relieve spinal cord compression. At the time of surgery, most patients had relapsed after androgen-deprivation therapy, while 5 were previously untreated. An extended cohort of prostate cancer bone metastases (n = 65) was used for immunohistochemical validation. Results: On average, 5,067 proteins were identified and quantified per tumor. Compared with primary tumors (n = 26), bone metastases were more heterogeneous and showed increased levels of proteins involved in cell-cycle progression, DNA damage response, RNA processing, and fatty acid β-oxidation; and reduced levels of proteins were related to cell adhesion and carbohydrate metabolism. Within bone metastases, we identified two phenotypic subgroups: BM1, expressing higher levels of AR canonical targets, and mitochondrial and Golgi apparatus resident proteins; and BM2, with increased expression of proliferation and DNA repair–related proteins. The two subgroups, validated by the inverse correlation between MCM3 and prostate specific antigen immunoreactivity, were related to disease prognosis, suggesting that this molecular heterogeneity should be considered when developing personalized therapies. Conclusions: This work is the first system-wide quantitative characterization of the proteome of prostate cancer bone metastases and a valuable resource for understanding the etiology of prostate cancer progression. Clin Cancer Res; 24(21); 5433–44. ©2018 AACR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-1229

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Coleman, 2006, Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity, Clin Cancer Res, 12, 6243s, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0931 · DOI
  2. Gandaglia, 2015, Impact of the site of metastases on survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer, Eur Urol, 68, 325, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.020 · DOI
  3. Parker, 2015, Cancer of the prostate: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, Ann Oncol, 26, v69, 10.1093/annonc/mdv222 · DOI
  4. Nuhn, 2018., Update on systemic prostate cancer therapies: management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the era of precision oncology, Eur Urol
  5. Barbosa, 2016, Overall survival in patients with localized prostate cancer in the US Veterans Health Administration: Is PIVOT Generalizable?, Eur Urol, 70, 227, 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.037 · DOI
  6. Wilt, 2012, Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer, N Engl J Med, 367, 203, 10.1056/NEJMoa1113162 · DOI
  7. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, 2015, The molecular taxonomy of primary prostate cancer, Cell, 163, 1011, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.025 · DOI
  8. Drake, 2016, Phosphoproteome integration reveals patient-specific networks in prostate cancer, Cell, 166, 1041, 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.007 · DOI
  9. Iglesias-Gato, 2016, The proteome of primary prostate cancer, Eur Urol, 69, 942, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.053 · DOI
  10. Huang, 2008, DAVID gene ID conversion tool, Bioinformation, 2, 428, 10.6026/97320630002428 · DOI
  11. Cline, 2007, Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape, Nat Protoc, 2, 2366, 10.1038/nprot.2007.324 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hornberg, 2011, Expression of androgen receptor splice variants in prostate cancer bone metastases is associated with castration-resistance and short survival, PLoS One, 6, e19059, 10.1371/journal.pone.0019059 · DOI
  13. Ylitalo, 2017, Subgroups of castration-resistant prostate cancer bone metastases defined through an inverse relationship between androgen receptor activity and immune response, Eur Urol, 71, 776, 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.033 · DOI
  14. Chen, 2002, Discordant protein and mRNA expression in lung adenocarcinomas, Mol Cell Proteomics, 1, 304, 10.1074/mcp.M200008-MCP200 · DOI
  15. Latonen, 2018, Integrative proteomics in prostate cancer uncovers robustness against genomic and transcriptomic aberrations during disease progression, Nat Commun, 9, 1176, 10.1038/s41467-018-03573-6 · DOI
  16. Li, 2015, Structure of the eukaryotic MCM complex at 3.8 A, Nature, 524, 186, 10.1038/nature14685 · DOI
  17. Cai, 2009, Reactivation of androgen receptor-regulated TMPRSS2:ERG gene expression in castration-resistant prostate cancer, Cancer Res, 69, 6027, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0395 · DOI
  18. Sharma, 2013, The androgen receptor induces a distinct transcriptional program in castration-resistant prostate cancer in man, Cancer Cell, 23, 35, 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.11.010 · DOI
  19. Taylor, 2010, Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer, Cancer Cell, 18, 11, 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.05.026 · DOI
  20. Cuzick, 2011, Prognostic value of an RNA expression signature derived from cell cycle proliferation genes in patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective study, Lancet Oncol, 12, 245, 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70295-3 · DOI
  21. Kumar, 2016, Substantial interindividual and limited intraindividual genomic diversity among tumors from men with metastatic prostate cancer, Nat Med, 22, 369, 10.1038/nm.4053 · DOI
  22. Bergstrom, 2016, Rat prostate tumor cells progress in the bone microenvironment to a highly aggressive phenotype, Neoplasia, 18, 152, 10.1016/j.neo.2016.01.007 · DOI
  23. Tomlins, 2007, Integrative molecular concept modeling of prostate cancer progression, Nat Genet, 39, 41, 10.1038/ng1935 · DOI
  24. You, 2016, Integrated classification of prostate cancer reveals a novel luminal subtype with poor outcome, Cancer Res, 76, 4948, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0902 · DOI
  25. Zhao, 2017, Associations of luminal and basal subtyping of prostate cancer with prognosis and response to androgen deprivation therapy, JAMA Oncol, 3, 1663, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0751 · DOI
  26. Beer, 2017, Enzalutamide in men with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: extended analysis of the phase 3 PREVAIL study, Eur Urol, 71, 151, 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.032 · DOI
  27. Ryan, 2013, Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy, N Engl J Med, 368, 138, 10.1056/NEJMoa1209096 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Nguyen, 2014, Targeting autophagy overcomes Enzalutamide resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer cells and improves therapeutic response in a xenograft model, Oncogene, 33, 4521, 10.1038/onc.2014.25 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Araujo, 2013, Docetaxel and dasatinib or placebo in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (READY): a randomised, double-blind phase 3 trial, Lancet Oncol, 14, 1307, 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70479-0 · DOI
  30. Michaelson, 2014, Randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of sunitinib plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in progressive, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer, J Clin Oncol, 32, 76, 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5268 · DOI
  31. Smith, 2016, Phase III study of cabozantinib in previously treated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: COMET-1, J Clin Oncol, 34, 3005, 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.5597 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Iglesias-Gato, D., Thysell, E., Tyanova, S., Crnalic, S., Santos, A., Lima, T. S., Geiger, T., Cox, J., Widmark, A., Bergh, A., Mann, M., Flores-Morales, A., & Wikström, P.
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (DE)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2018-11-01
Volume
24
Issue
21
Pages
5433-5444
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2883308042
Cited by
106
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
FWCI
9.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Danish Research Council (DFF 4004-00450)
  • Danish Cancer Society (R90-A6060-14-S2)
  • Swedish Research Council (K2013-64X-20407-04-3)
  • Swedish Cancer Society (CAN 2016/824, CAN 2013/1324, CAN 2015/732)
  • Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (RB13-0119)
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF14CC0001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
prostate cancer, bone metastasis, tumor proteome, proteomic heterogeneity, prognostic factors, androgen receptor, MCM3, prostate-specific antigen, DNA repair, cell cycle, DNA damage response, fatty acid beta-oxidation, cell adhesion, mitochondrial proteins, phenotypic subgroups, spinal cord compression, androgen deprivation therapy
MeSH terms
Aged, Biopsy, Bone Neoplasms, Combined Modality Therapy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Prognosis, Prostatic Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Computational Biology, Proteome, Gene Expression Profiling, Proteomics, Transcriptome, Neoplasm Grading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Proteome of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis Reveals Heterogeneity with Prognostic Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-1229
The paper
Iglesias-Gato, D., Thysell, E., Tyanova, S., Crnalic, S., Santos, A., Lima, T. S., Geiger, T., Cox, J., Widmark, A., Bergh, A., Mann, M., Flores-Morales, A., & Wikström, P. (2018). The Proteome of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis Reveals Heterogeneity with Prognostic Implications. Clinical Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-1229