Cited by 29TGF-β signaling in diseasesMechanisms of cancer metastasisCancer Cells and Metastasis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Outcome of TGFβ Antagonism in Metastatic Breast Cancer Models In Vivo Reflects a Complex Balance between Tumor-Suppressive and Proprogression Activities of TGFβ

Open access
Yang, Yuan, Yang, Howard H., Tang, Binwu, Wu, Alex Man Lai, Flanders, Kathleen C., Moshkovich, Nellie, Weinberg, Douglas S., Welsh, Michael A., Weng, Jia, Ochoa, Humberto J., Hu, Tiffany Y., Herrmann, Michelle A., Chen, Jinqiu, Edmondson, Elijah F., Simpson, R. Mark, Liu, Fang, Liu, Huaitian, Lee, Maxwell P., Wakefield, Lalage M.·2020·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: TGFβs are overexpressed in many advanced cancers and promote cancer progression through mechanisms that include suppression of immunosurveillance. Multiple strategies to antagonize the TGFβ pathway are in early-phase oncology trials. However, TGFβs also have tumor-suppressive activities early in tumorigenesis, and the extent to which these might be retained in advanced disease has not been fully explored. Experimental Design: A panel of 12 immunocompetent mouse allograft models of metastatic breast cancer was tested for the effect of neutralizing anti-TGFβ antibodies on lung metastatic burden. Extensive correlative biology analyses were performed to assess potential predictive biomarkers and probe underlying mechanisms. Results: Heterogeneous responses to anti-TGFβ treatment were observed, with 5 of 12 models (42%) showing suppression of metastasis, 4 of 12 (33%) showing no response, and 3 of 12 (25%) showing an undesirable stimulation (up to 9-fold) of metastasis. Inhibition of metastasis was immune-dependent, whereas stimulation of metastasis was immune-independent and targeted the tumor cell compartment, potentially affecting the cancer stem cell. Thus, the integrated outcome of TGFβ antagonism depends on a complex balance between enhancing effective antitumor immunity and disrupting persistent tumor-suppressive effects of TGFβ on the tumor cell. Applying transcriptomic signatures derived from treatment-naïve mouse primary tumors to human breast cancer datasets suggested that patients with breast cancer with high-grade, estrogen receptor–negative disease are most likely to benefit from anti-TGFβ therapy. Conclusions: Contrary to dogma, tumor-suppressive responses to TGFβ are retained in some advanced metastatic tumors. Safe deployment of TGFβ antagonists in the clinic will require good predictive biomarkers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-2370

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 29

Metadata

Authors
Yang, Y., Yang, H. H., Tang, B., Wu, A. M. L., Flanders, K. C., Moshkovich, N., Weinberg, D. S., Welsh, M. A., Weng, J., Ochoa, H. J., Hu, T. Y., Herrmann, M. A., Chen, J., Edmondson, E. F., Simpson, R. M., Liu, F., Liu, H., Lee, M. P., & Wakefield, L. M.
Affiliations
  • 1Lab of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Wakefield, Lalage M.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2020-02-01
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
643-656
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2977670851
Cited by
29
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH (ZIA BC 010881)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mechanisms of cancer metastasis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
metastatic breast cancer, anti-TGF-beta antibody, tumor suppression, tumor progression, lung metastasis, antitumor immunity, cancer stem cells, predictive biomarkers, estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Animals, Breast Neoplasms, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neoplastic Stem Cells, Signal Transduction, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Genes, Tumor Suppressor, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Treatment Outcome, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Outcome of TGFβ Antagonism in Metastatic Breast Cancer Models In Vivo Reflects a Complex Balance between Tumor-Suppressive and Proprogression Activities of TGFβ. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-2370
The paper
Yang, Y., Yang, H. H., Tang, B., Wu, A. M. L., Flanders, K. C., Moshkovich, N., Weinberg, D. S., Welsh, M. A., Weng, J., Ochoa, H. J., Hu, T. Y., Herrmann, M. A., Chen, J., Edmondson, E. F., Simpson, R. M., Liu, F., Liu, H., Lee, M. P., & Wakefield, L. M. (2020). The Outcome of TGFβ Antagonism in Metastatic Breast Cancer Models In Vivo Reflects a Complex Balance between Tumor-Suppressive and Proprogression Activities of TGFβ. Clinical Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-2370