Cited by 1,466TGF-β signaling in diseasesConnective tissue disorders researchLiver physiology and pathology

Targeting the TGFβ signalling pathway in disease

Open access
Akhurst, Rosemary J., Hata, Akiko·2012·Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Abstract

Many drugs that target transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) signalling have been developed, some of which have reached Phase III clinical trials for a number of disease applications. Preclinical and clinical studies indicate the utility of these agents in fibrosis and oncology, particularly in augmentation of existing cancer therapies, such as radiation and chemotherapy, as well as in tumour vaccines. There are also reports of specialized applications, such as the reduction of vascular symptoms of Marfan syndrome. Here, we consider why the TGFβ signalling pathway is a drug target, the potential clinical applications of TGFβ inhibition, the issues arising with anti-TGFβ therapy and how these might be tackled using personalized approaches to dosing, monitoring of biomarkers as well as brief and/or localized drug-dosing regimens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrd3810

Cites

244 of 244 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systemic TGF-β blockade was associated with immune dysregulation, impaired tissue homeostasis, and increased oncogenic risk, limiting broader clinical application.

    “these studies also highlighted the limitations of systemic pathway inhibition as systemic TGF-β blockade was associated with immune dysregulation, impaired tissue homeostasis, and increased oncogenic risk, limiting broader clinical application (141).”

    From Targeting macrophages in liver fibrosis (2026) · cites this paper as [141]

    The Cancer section identifies inflammation, autoimmunity, cardiovascular defects and loss of tumour suppression as concerns with TGF-β inhibition; it also reports increased metastases in mouse models and skin lesions in one Phase I trial. But it says clinical trials had shown no widespread inflammatory complications or the cited cardiovascular and bone effects. The claim overstates these potential and preclinical risks as an established association of systemic blockade across clinical use. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • GDF10 signals through TGFβ receptors.

    “and signals through TGFβ receptors (TGFβR)14,15.”

    From GDF10 is a signal for axonal sprouting and functional recovery after stroke (2015) · cites this paper as [14]

    The TGFβ family section identifies GDFs as members of the TGFβ superfamily, and the TGFβ signalling section says members signal through type I and type II receptor complexes. The paper does not identify GDF10 specifically or establish that it uses the receptors denoted TGFβR in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • GDF10 is a divergent member of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)/transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) superfamily.

    “GDF10 is a divergent member of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)/transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) superfamily11–14”

    From GDF10 is a signal for axonal sprouting and functional recovery after stroke (2015) · cites this paper as [14]

    The TGFβ family section identifies GDFs and BMPs as members of the TGFβ superfamily. It does not identify GDF10 specifically or describe it as divergent; searches for “GDF10” and “BMP-3b” found no such passage. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Though TGF and GDF10 both signal through TGFβRI/II, their signaling levels are not equivalent.

    “Though TGF and GDF10 both signal through TGFβRI/II12–14, we show that their signaling levels are not equivalent.”

    From GDF10 is a signal for axonal sprouting and functional recovery after stroke (2015) · cites this paper as [14]

    The TGFβ signalling section says that TGFβ-superfamily ligands signal through type I and type II receptors, and The TGFβ family section includes GDFs in that superfamily (page numbers unavailable). It does not establish that GDF10 specifically uses TGFβRI/II. The difference in signalling levels is presented as the citing authors’ own finding, not as a claim attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Such context-specific signaling is a hallmark of TGFβ in its role in cancer, where it switches from inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis to promotion of endothelial to mesenchymal transition and metastasis as the local tumor environment evolves.

    “Such context-specific signaling is a hallmark of TGFβ in its role in cancer, where it switches from inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis to promotion of endothelial to mesenchymal transition and metastasis as the local tumor environment evolves14,43.”

    From GDF10 is a signal for axonal sprouting and functional recovery after stroke (2015) · cites this paper as [14]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akhurst, R. J., & Hata, A.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Akhurst, Rosemary J.
Venue
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Published
2012-09-24
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
790-811
ISSN
  • 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1784
OpenAlex
W2150548551
Cited by
1,466
References
244
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 131 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 136 · 2016: 125 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 96 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2012-10-19)
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl078564-05)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL108317, R01-HL078564)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA116019, R21CA164772, P30CA082103)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM060514)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P01AR050440)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
drug development, fibrosis, cancer, inflammation, radiosensitization, chemosensitization, cancer vaccines, Marfan syndrome, individualized dosing, biomarker monitoring, local drug delivery
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Protein Binding, Signal Transduction, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Drug Delivery Systems, Receptors, Transforming Growth Factor beta

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review