Cited by 66Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

First-In-Human Study of Cemiplimab Alone or In Combination with Radiotherapy and/or Low-dose Cyclophosphamide in Patients with Advanced Malignancies

Papadopoulos, Kyriakos P., Johnson, Melissa L., Lockhart, Albert C., Moore, Kathleen, Falchook, Gerald S., Formenti, Silvia C., Naing, Aung, Carvajal, Richard D. +10 more·2020·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: This first-in-human study assessed the safety, tolerability, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics of cemiplimab, a monoclonal anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), as monotherapy and in combination with hypofractionated radiotherapy (hfRT) and/or cyclophosphamide (CPA) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Patients were enrolled in 1 of 10 dose escalation cohorts and received cemiplimab 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously for up to 48 weeks. Depending on the cohort, patients received hfRT and/or low-dose (200 mg/m2) CPA. Safety was evaluated. Antitumor activity was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Results: Sixty patients were enrolled. The median duration of follow-up was 19.3 weeks (range, 2.3–84.3). There were no DLTs. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were fatigue (45.0%), nausea (36.7%), and vomiting (25.0%). The most common immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade were arthralgia (10.0%), hypothyroidism (8.3%), and maculopapular rash (8.3%). Cemiplimab pharmacokinetic parameters increased in a close to dose-proportional manner and were similar regardless of combination therapy regimen. Two patients (one with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and one with cervical cancer) experienced a complete response; 7 had a partial response. Observed duration of response was ≥12 months in 6 patients. Conclusions: The safety profile of cemiplimab was comparable with other anti–PD-1 agents. Addition of hfRT and/or CPA did not appear to increase grade ≥3 irAEs, suggesting that cemiplimab can be safely administered with hfRT and/or CPA. Cemiplimab exhibited encouraging antitumor activity with 2 complete responses and 7 partial responses observed; responses were also durable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-2609

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • α-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemoradiotherapy was tolerable in advanced NSCLC, HNSCC, and SCLC patients, with promising clinical outcomes, in phase 1/2 studies.

    “Moreover, the results of some phase 1/2 studies (NCT02621398, NCT02434081, NCT02586207, NCT02383212, and NCT02402920) showed that α-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemoradiotherapy was tolerable in advanced NSCLC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and SCLC patients, with promising clinical outcomes [78–82].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papadopoulos, K. P., Johnson, M. L., Lockhart, A. C., Moore, K., Falchook, G. S., Formenti, S. C., Naing, A., Carvajal, R. D., Rosen, L. S., Weiss, G. J., Leidner, R. S., Li, J., Paccaly, A., Feng, M., Stankevich, E., Lowy, I., Fury, M. G., & Crittenden, M. R.
Affiliations
  • South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics (US)
  • Sarah Cannon (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center (US)
  • HealthONE (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Western Regional Medical Center (US)
  • Providence Portland Medical Center (US)
  • 12Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Basking Ridge, New Jersey.
  • Regeneron (United States) (US)
  • Oregon Clinic (US)
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2020-03-01
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
1025-1033
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2993204321
Cited by
66
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (N/A)
  • Sanofi (N/A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cemiplimab, PD-1 inhibitors, hypofractionated radiotherapy, cyclophosphamide, immune checkpoint inhibitor combination, advanced solid tumors, immune-related adverse events, anticancer activity, pharmacokinetics, dose-limiting toxicity, first-in-human safety
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Cyclophosphamide, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nausea, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Chemoradiotherapy, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Patient Safety, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review