Cited by 161Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Blocking TIM-3 in Treatment-refractory Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase Ia/b Study of LY3321367 with or without an Anti-PD-L1 Antibody

Open access
Harding, James J., Moreno, Victor, Bang, Yung-Jue, Hong, Min Hee, Patnaik, Amita, Trigo, José, Szpurka, Anna M., Yamamoto, Noboru +11 more·2021·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain–containing molecule-3 (TIM-3) blunts anticancer immunity and mediates resistance to programmed death 1 (PD-1) and PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. We assessed a novel, first-in-class, TIM-3 mAb, LY3321367, alone or in combination with the anti-PD-L1 antibody, LY300054 in patients with advanced solid tumor. Patients and Methods: This open-label, multicenter, phase Ia/b study aimed to define the safety/tolerability and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of LY3321367 with or without LY300054. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and efficacy. Biomarkers were assessed in exploratory analysis. Results: No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in the monotherapy (N = 30) or combination (N = 28) dose escalation. LY3321367 treatment-related adverse events (≥2 patients) included pruritus, rash, fatigue, anorexia, and infusion-related reactions. Dose-proportional increase in LY3321367 concentrations was not affected by either LY300054 or antidrug antibodies (observed in 50%–70% of patients). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling indicated 100% target engagement at doses ≥600 mg. LY3321367 RP2D was 1,200 mg biweekly for four doses followed by 600 mg every 2 weeks thereafter. In the non–small cell lung cancer monotherapy expansion cohort, outcomes varied by prior anti-PD-1 therapy response status: anti-PD-1/L1 refractory patients [N = 23, objective response rate (ORR) 0%, disease control rate (DCR) 35%, progression-free survival (PFS) 1.9 months] versus anti-PD-1/L1 responders (N = 14, ORR 7%, DCR 50%, PFS 7.3 months). In combination expansion cohorts (N = 91), ORR and DCR were 4% and 42%; CD8 infiltration in paired biopsies increased in approximately half these patients. Conclusions: LY3321367 exhibited acceptable safety profile with favorable pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics but only modest antitumor activity. The therapeutic relevance of TIM-3 blockade requires further investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-4405

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harding, J. J., Moreno, V., Bang, Y.-J., Hong, M. H., Patnaik, A., Trigo, J., Szpurka, A. M., Yamamoto, N., Doi, T., Fu, S., Calderon, B., Velez de Mendizabal, N., Calvo, E., Yu, D., Gandhi, L., Liu, Z. T., Galvao, V. R., Leow, C. C., & de Miguel, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • 2START Madrid-FJD, Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics (US)
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria (ES)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • National Cancer Centre Japan (JP)
  • National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • 7Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • 11START Madrid, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain.
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • 13Eli Lilly and Company, New York, New York.
Corresponding author
Harding, James J.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2021-01-29
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
2168-2178
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W3123341232
Cited by
161
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13
FWCI
9.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
TIM-3, PD-L1 inhibitors, immune checkpoint blockade, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor resistance, non-small cell lung cancer, combination immunotherapy, CD8+ T cell infiltration, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, target engagement, antidrug antibodies
MeSH terms
Hepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2, Progression-Free Survival, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Young Adult, B7-H1 Antigen, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review