Cited by 68Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesGenetic factors in colorectal cancerCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Intratumor CMS heterogeneity impacts patient prognosis in localized colon cancer

Open access
Marisa, Laetitia, Blum, Yuna, Taieb, Julien, Ayadi, Mira, Pilati, Camilla, Le Malicot, Karine, Lepage, Côme, Salazar, Ramon +12 more·2021·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: The consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) represent a significant advance in the understanding of intertumor heterogeneity in colon cancer. Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) is the new frontier for refining prognostication and understanding treatment resistance. This study aims at deciphering the transcriptomic ITH of colon cancer and understanding its potential prognostic implications. Experimental Design: We deconvoluted the transcriptomic profiles of 1,779 tumors from the PETACC8 trial and 155 colon cancer cell lines as weighted sums of the four CMSs, using the Weighted In Silico Pathology (WISP) algorithm. We assigned to each tumor and cell line a combination of up to three CMS subtypes with a threshold above 20%. Results: Over 55% of tumors corresponded to mixtures of at least two CMSs, demonstrating pervasive ITH in colon cancer. Of note, ITH was associated with shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival, [HR, 1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI; 1.12–1.59), 1.40, 95% CI (1.14–1.71), respectively]. Moreover, we uncovered specific combinations of CMS associated with dismal prognosis. In multivariate analysis, ITH represents the third parameter explaining DFS variance, after T and N stages. At a cellular level, combined WISP and single-cell transcriptomic analysis revealed that most colon cancer cell lines are a mixture of cells falling into different CMSs, indicating that ITH may correspond to distinct functional statuses of colon cancer cells. Conclusions: This study shows that CMS-based transcriptomic ITH is frequent in colon cancer and impacts its prognosis. CMS-based transcriptomic ITH may correspond to distinct functional statuses of colon cancer cells, suggesting plasticity between CMS-related cell populations. Transcriptomic ITH deserves further assessment in the context of personalized medicine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0529

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marisa, L., Blum, Y., Taieb, J., Ayadi, M., Pilati, C., Le Malicot, K., Lepage, C., Salazar, R., Aust, D., Duval, A., Blons, H., Taly, V., Gentien, D., Rapinat, A., Selves, J., Mouillet-Richard, S., Boige, V., Emile, J.-F., de Reyniès, A., & Laurent-Puig, P.
Affiliations
  • 1Programme Cartes d'Identité des Tumeurs, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Paris, France.
  • La Ligue Contre le Cancer (FR)
  • 2Institut du cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • 4Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, INSERM, Université de Bourgogne et Franche Comté, Dijon, France.
  • Inserm (FR)
  • 6Catalan Institute of Oncology (IDIBELL), Universitat de Barcelona, CIBERONC, Spanish Gastrointestinal Tumors TTD Group, Barcelona, Spain.
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
  • Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR)
  • 10Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse, INSERM, Université Toulouse III, Department of Pathology, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
  • 3Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, CNRS SNC 5096, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
  • Hôpital Ambroise-Paré (FR)
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2021-06-24
Volume
27
Issue
17
Pages
4768-4780
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W3174644591
Cited by
68
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • SIRIC CARPEM (INCa-DGOS-Inserm_12561)
  • ITMO CANCER (COCAHEMISCLE)
  • Fédération Francophone de cancerologie digestive (FFCD)
  • Ligue Contre le Cancer (CIT)
  • Institut National Du Cancer (HETCOLI)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
intratumoral heterogeneity, consensus molecular subtypes, colon cancer, transcriptomic heterogeneity, prognosis, disease-free survival, overall survival, colon cancer cell lines, single-cell transcriptomics, tumor plasticity, treatment resistance
MeSH terms
Aged, Colonic Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Survival Rate, Gene Expression Profiling, Cell Line, Tumor, Tumor Microenvironment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review