Cited by 20TGF-β signaling in diseasesWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Colorectal Cancer-Associated Smad4 R361 Hotspot Mutations Boost Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling through Enhanced Smad4-LEF1 Binding

Open access
Lanauze, Claudia B., Sehgal, Priyanka, Hayer, Katharina, Torres-Diz, Manuel, Pippin, James A., Grant, Struan F.A., Thomas-Tikhonenko, Andrei·2021·Molecular Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

About 10% to 30% of patients with colorectal cancer harbor either loss of or missense mutations in SMAD4, a critical component of the TGFβ signaling pathway. The pathophysiologic function of missense mutations in Smad4 is not fully understood. They usually map to the MH2 domain, specifically to residues that are involved in heterodimeric complex formation with regulatory Smads (such as Smad2/3) and ensuing transcriptional activation. These detrimental effects suggest that SMAD4 missense mutations can be categorized as loss-of-function. However, they tend to cluster in a few hotspots, which is more consistent with them acting by a gain-of-function mechanism. In this study, we investigated the functional role of Smad4 R361 mutants by re-expressing two R361 Smad4 variants in several Smad4-null colorectal cancer cell lines. As predicted, R361 mutations disrupted Smad2/3-Smad4 heteromeric complex formation and abolished canonical TGFβ signaling. In that, they were similar to SMAD4 loss. However, RNA sequencing and subsequent RT-PCR assays revealed that Smad4mut cells acquired a gene signature associated with enhanced Lef1 protein function and increased Wnt signaling. Mechanistically, Smad4 mutant proteins retained binding to Lef1 protein and drove a commensurate increase in downstream Wnt signaling as measured by TOP/FOP luciferase assay and Wnt-dependent cell motility. Consistent with these findings, human colorectal cancers with SMAD4 missense mutations were less likely to acquire activating mutations in the key Wnt pathway gene CTNNB1 (encoding β-catenin) than colorectal cancers with truncating SMAD4 nonsense mutations. Implications: Our studies suggest that in colorectal cancer hotspot mutations in Smad4 confer enhanced Wnt signaling and possibly heightened sensitivity to Wnt pathway inhibitors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-20-0721

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Paneth-like cells were readily induced by KRAS-EGFR inhibition in both SMAD4 wild-type models (LS174T and KRAS G12D PDOs) and SMAD4 mutant lines (SW1463 and RW7213) harboring the loss-of-function SMAD4 R361C mutation.

    “Moreover, Paneth-like cells were readily induced by KRAS-EGFR inhibition in both SMAD4 wild-type models (LS174T and KRAS G12D PDOs) (Figures 1I–1N, S1J, and S1K) and SMAD4 mutant lines (SW1463 and RW7213) harboring the loss-of-function SMAD4 R361C mutation (Figures S1L–S1O).53”

    From Paneth-like transition drives resistance to dual targeting of KRAS and EGFR in colorectal cancer (2026) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Results section (‘Smad4 mutants do not support canonical TGFβ-induced transcriptional activity’; page unavailable) supports calling R361C loss-of-function for canonical TGFβ signaling. Our copy does not establish that SW1463 or RW7213 harbor R361C, or report Paneth-like cell induction after KRAS–EGFR inhibition; the citing sentence points to its own figures for the induction results. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lanauze, C. B., Sehgal, P., Hayer, K., Torres-Diz, M., Pippin, J. A., Grant, S. F. A., & Thomas-Tikhonenko, A.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • 1Division of Pathobiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Venue
Molecular Cancer Research
Published
2021-02-19
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
823-833
ISSN
  • 1541-7786 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3125
OpenAlex
W3129236693
Cited by
17
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH (R01 CA196299, 5T32 CA009140)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
SMAD4, colorectal cancer, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, LEF1, TGF-beta signaling, gain-of-function mutations, CTNNB1 mutation, Wnt pathway inhibitors, cell motility
MeSH terms
Humans, Mutation, Transfection, Colorectal Neoplasms, Lymphoid Enhancer-Binding Factor 1, Smad4 Protein, Wnt Signaling Pathway

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review