Cited by 6Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RAF-Mutant Melanomas Differentially Depend on ERK2 Over ERK1 to Support Aberrant MAPK Pathway Activation and Cell Proliferation

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Half of advanced human melanomas are driven by mutant BRAF and dependent on MAPK signaling. Interestingly, the results of three independent genetic screens highlight a dependency of BRAF-mutant melanoma cell lines on BRAF and ERK2, but not ERK1. ERK2 is expressed higher in melanoma compared with other cancer types and higher than ERK1 within melanoma. However, ERK1 and ERK2 are similarly required in primary human melanocytes transformed with mutant BRAF and are expressed at a similar, lower amount compared with established cancer cell lines. ERK1 can compensate for ERK2 loss as seen by expression of ERK1 rescuing the proliferation arrest mediated by ERK2 loss (both by shRNA or inhibition by an ERK inhibitor). ERK2 knockdown, as opposed to ERK1 knockdown, led to more robust suppression of MAPK signaling as seen by RNA-sequencing, qRT-PCR, and Western blot analysis. In addition, treatment with MAPK pathway inhibitors led to gene expression changes that closely resembled those seen upon knockdown of ERK2 but not ERK1. Together, these data demonstrate that ERK2 drives BRAF-mutant melanoma gene expression and proliferation as a function of its higher expression compared with ERK1. Selective inhibition of ERK2 for the treatment of melanomas may spare the toxicity associated with pan-ERK inhibition in normal tissues. Implications: BRAF-mutant melanomas overexpress and depend on ERK2 but not ERK1, suggesting that ERK2-selective inhibition may be toxicity sparing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-20-1022

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Eblen, 2018, Extracellular-regulated kinases: signaling from Ras to ERK substrates to control biological outcomes, Adv Cancer Res, 138, 99, 10.1016/bs.acr.2018.02.004 · DOI
  2. Davies, 2002, Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer, Nature, 417, 949, 10.1038/nature00766 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Yaeger, 2019, Targeting alterations in the RAF-MEK pathway, Cancer Discov, 9, 329, 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-1321 · DOI
  4. Roskoski, 2019, Targeting ERK1/2 protein-serine/threonine kinases in human cancers, Pharmacol Res, 142, 151, 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.01.039 · DOI
  5. Busca, 2016, ERK1 and ERK2 map kinases: specific roles or functional redundancy?, Front Cell Dev Biol, 4, 53, 10.3389/fcell.2016.00053 · DOI
  6. Cohen-Armon, 2007, DNA-independent PARP-1 activation by phosphorylated ERK2 increases Elk1 activity: a link to histone acetylation, Mol Cell, 25, 297, 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Kang, 2017, ERK1 Directly Interacts With JNK1 Leading to Regulation of JNK1/c-Jun Activity and Cell Transformation, J Cell Biochem, 118, 2357, 10.1002/jcb.25896 · DOI
  8. Roskoski, 2012, ERK1/2 MAP kinases: structure, function, and regulation, Pharmacol Res, 66, 105, 10.1016/j.phrs.2012.04.005 · DOI
  9. Miller, 2017, A high throughput assay to identify substrate-selective inhibitors of the ERK protein kinases, Biochem Pharmacol, 142, 39, 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.06.127 · DOI
  10. Sammons, 2019, Targeting ERK beyond the boundaries of the kinase active site in melanoma, Mol Carcinog, 58, 1551, 10.1002/mc.23047 · DOI
  11. Barretina, 2012, The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity, Nature, 483, 603, 10.1038/nature11003 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Leung, 2019, Hyperactivation of MAPK signaling is deleterious to RAS/RAF-mutant melanoma, Mol Cancer Res, 17, 199, 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0327 · DOI
  13. Smurnyy, 2014, DNA sequencing and CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing for target validation in mammalian cells, Nat Chem Biol, 10, 623, 10.1038/nchembio.1550 · DOI
  14. Dai, 2005, Evolving gene/transcript definitions significantly alter the interpretation of GeneChip data, Nucleic Acids Res, 33, e175, 10.1093/nar/gni179 · DOI
  15. Sato, 2020, Phenotypic screening using large-scale genomic libraries to identify drug targets for the treatment of cancer, Oncol Lett, 19, 3617
  16. McDonald, 2017, Project DRIVE: a compendium of cancer dependencies and synthetic lethal relationships uncovered by large-scale, deep RNAi screening, Cell, 170, 577, 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  17. McFarland, 2018, Improved estimation of cancer dependencies from large-scale RNAi screens using model-based normalization and data integration, Nat Commun, 9, 4610, 10.1038/s41467-018-06916-5 · DOI
  18. Tsherniak, 2017, Defining a cancer dependency map, Cell, 170, 564, 10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Dempster, 2019, Agreement between two large pan-cancer CRISPR-Cas9 gene dependency data sets, Nat Commun, 10, 5817, 10.1038/s41467-019-13805-y · DOI
  20. Meyers, 2017, Computational correction of copy number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells, Nat Genet, 49, 1779, 10.1038/ng.3984 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Reed, 1995, Loss of expression of the p16/cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2 tumor suppressor gene in melanocytic lesions correlates with invasive stage of tumor progression, Cancer Res, 55, 2713
  22. Tate, 2019, COSMIC: the catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer, Nucleic Acids Res, 47, D941, 10.1093/nar/gky1015 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Hatano, 2003, Essential role for ERK2 mitogen-activated protein kinase in placental development, Genes Cells, 8, 847, 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2003.00680.x · DOI · Paper page
  24. Selcher, 2001, Mice lacking the ERK1 isoform of MAP kinase are unimpaired in emotional learning, Learn Mem, 8, 11, 10.1101/lm.37001 · DOI
  25. Fremin, 2015, Functional redundancy of ERK1 and ERK2 MAP kinases during development, Cell Rep, 12, 913, 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.011 · DOI
  26. Nusinow, 2020, Quantitative proteomics of the cancer cell line encyclopedia, Cell, 180, 387, 10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.023 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Ghandi, 2019, Next-generation characterization of the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, Nature, 569, 503, 10.1038/s41586-019-1186-3 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Banaszynski, 2006, A rapid, reversible, and tunable method to regulate protein function in living cells using synthetic small molecules, Cell, 126, 995, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.025 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Robinson, 1996, Mutation of position 52 in ERK2 creates a nonproductive binding mode for adenosine 5′-triphosphate, Biochemistry, 35, 5641, 10.1021/bi952723e · DOI
  30. Dimitri, 2005, Spatially separate docking sites on ERK2 regulate distinct signaling events in vivo, Curr Biol, 15, 1319, 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.037 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Shin, 2010, ERK2 but not ERK1 induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transformation via DEF motif-dependent signaling events, Mol Cell, 38, 114, 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.020 · DOI
  32. Gagliardi, 2020, Differential functions of ERK1 and ERK2 in lung metastasis processes in triple-negative breast cancer, Sci Rep, 10, 8537, 10.1038/s41598-020-65250-3 · DOI
  33. Gusenbauer, 2015, Erk2 but not Erk1 regulates crosstalk between Met and EGFR in squamous cell carcinoma cell lines, Mol Cancer, 14, 54, 10.1186/s12943-015-0319-z · DOI
  34. Kaufmann, 2001, The extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases Erk1/Erk2 stimulate expression and biological activity of the transcriptional regulator Egr-1, Biol Chem, 382, 1077, 10.1515/BC.2001.135 · DOI
  35. Inoue, 2004, Transcriptional induction of FosB/DeltaFosB gene by mechanical stress in osteoblasts, J Biol Chem, 279, 49795, 10.1074/jbc.M404096200 · DOI
  36. Ahn, 2017, The slow cycling phenotype: a growing problem for treatment resistance in melanoma, Mol Cancer Ther, 16, 1002, 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0535 · DOI
  37. Sharma, 2005, Mutant V599EB-Raf regulates growth and vascular development of malignant melanoma tumors, Cancer Res, 65, 2412, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2423 · DOI
  38. Ricard, 2019, Isoform-specific roles of ERK1 and ERK2 in arteriogenesis, Cells, 9, 38, 10.3390/cells9010038 · DOI
  39. Marchi, 2008, The N-terminal domain of ERK1 accounts for the functional differences with ERK2, PLoS One, 3, e3873, 10.1371/journal.pone.0003873 · DOI
  40. Lefloch, 2009, Total ERK1/2 activity regulates cell proliferation, Cell Cycle, 8, 705, 10.4161/cc.8.5.7734 · DOI
  41. Unal, 2017, A compendium of ERK targets, FEBS Lett, 591, 2607, 10.1002/1873-3468.12740 · DOI
  42. Fantz, 2001, Docking sites on substrate proteins direct extracellular signal-regulated kinase to phosphorylate specific residues, J Biol Chem, 276, 27256, 10.1074/jbc.M102512200 · DOI
  43. Lee, 2011, Examining docking interactions on ERK2 with modular peptide substrates, Biochemistry, 50, 9500, 10.1021/bi201103b · DOI
  44. Boston, 2011, Characterization of ERK docking domain inhibitors that induce apoptosis by targeting Rsk-1 and caspase-9, BMC Cancer, 11, 7, 10.1186/1471-2407-11-7 · DOI
  45. Hancock, 2005, Identification of novel extracellular signal-regulated kinase docking domain inhibitors, J Med Chem, 48, 4586, 10.1021/jm0501174 · DOI
  46. Sammons, 2019, A novel class of common docking domain inhibitors that prevent ERK2 activation and substrate phosphorylation, ACS Chem Biol, 14, 1183, 10.1021/acschembio.9b00093 · DOI
  47. Qin, 2012, Specifically targeting ERK1 or ERK2 kills melanoma cells, J Transl Med, 10, 15, 10.1186/1479-5876-10-15 · DOI
  48. Lake, 2016, Negative feedback regulation of the ERK1/2 MAPK pathway, Cell Mol Life Sci, 73, 4397, 10.1007/s00018-016-2297-8 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Frémin, 2007, ERK2 but not ERK1 plays a key role in hepatocyte replication: an RNAi-mediated ERK2 knockdown approach in wild-type and ERK1 null hepatocytes, Hepatology, 45, 1035, 10.1002/hep.21551 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Shin, 2018, Isoform-selective activity-based profiling of ERK signaling, Chem Sci, 9, 2419, 10.1039/C8SC00043C · DOI
  51. Plotnikov, 2015, The nuclear translocation of ERK1/2 as an anticancer target, Nat Commun, 6, 6685, 10.1038/ncomms7685 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Crowe, M. S., Zavorotinskaya, T., Voliva, C. F., Shirley, M. D., Wang, Y., Ruddy, D. A., Rakiec, D. P., Engelman, J. A., Stuart, D. D., & Freeman, A. K.
Affiliations
  • 1Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • 2Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Emeryville, California.
Corresponding author
Freeman, Alyson K.
Venue
Molecular Cancer Research
Published
2021-03-11
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
1063-1075
ISSN
  • 1541-7786 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3125
OpenAlex
W3135174747
Cited by
6
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Keywords
BRAF-mutant melanoma, ERK2, ERK1, MAPK signaling, melanoma cell proliferation, melanocyte transformation, gene expression profiling, MAPK pathway inhibitors
MeSH terms
RNA-Seq, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Melanoma, Mutation, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1, MAP Kinase Signaling System, RNA Interference, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Cell Proliferation, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review