The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RAF-Mutant Melanomas Differentially Depend on ERK2 Over ERK1 to Support Aberrant MAPK Pathway Activation and Cell Proliferation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Half of advanced human melanomas are driven by mutant BRAF and dependent on MAPK signaling. Interestingly, the results of three independent genetic screens highlight a dependency of BRAF-mutant melanoma cell lines on BRAF and ERK2, but not ERK1. ERK2 is expressed higher in melanoma compared with other cancer types and higher than ERK1 within melanoma. However, ERK1 and ERK2 are similarly required in primary human melanocytes transformed with mutant BRAF and are expressed at a similar, lower amount compared with established cancer cell lines. ERK1 can compensate for ERK2 loss as seen by expression of ERK1 rescuing the proliferation arrest mediated by ERK2 loss (both by shRNA or inhibition by an ERK inhibitor). ERK2 knockdown, as opposed to ERK1 knockdown, led to more robust suppression of MAPK signaling as seen by RNA-sequencing, qRT-PCR, and Western blot analysis. In addition, treatment with MAPK pathway inhibitors led to gene expression changes that closely resembled those seen upon knockdown of ERK2 but not ERK1. Together, these data demonstrate that ERK2 drives BRAF-mutant melanoma gene expression and proliferation as a function of its higher expression compared with ERK1. Selective inhibition of ERK2 for the treatment of melanomas may spare the toxicity associated with pan-ERK inhibition in normal tissues. Implications: BRAF-mutant melanomas overexpress and depend on ERK2 but not ERK1, suggesting that ERK2-selective inhibition may be toxicity sparing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 1×
“S2A), consistent with the reported half-life of these proteins of greater than 48 hours (21).”
BackgroundJacobs, D., Glossip, D., Xing, H., Muslin, A. J., & Kornfeld, K. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.2.163 · Cited by 439
An essential function of the mitogen‐activated protein kinase Erk2 in mouse trophoblast development
Saba‐El‐Leil, M. K., Vella, F. D. J., Vernay, B., Voisin, L., Chen, L., Labrecque, N., Ang, S., & Meloche, S. (2003) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.embor939 · Cited by 366
Docking Motif Interactions in MAP Kinases Revealed by Hydrogen Exchange Mass Spectrometry
Lee, T., Hoofnagle, A. N., Kabuyama, Y., Stroud, J., Min, X., Goldsmith, E. J., Chen, L., Resing, K. A., & Ahn, N. G. (2004) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(04)00161-3 · Cited by 282
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- Eblen, 2018, Extracellular-regulated kinases: signaling from Ras to ERK substrates to control biological outcomes, Adv Cancer Res, 138, 99, 10.1016/bs.acr.2018.02.004 · DOI
- Davies, 2002, Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer, Nature, 417, 949, 10.1038/nature00766 · DOI · Paper page
- Yaeger, 2019, Targeting alterations in the RAF-MEK pathway, Cancer Discov, 9, 329, 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-1321 · DOI
- Roskoski, 2019, Targeting ERK1/2 protein-serine/threonine kinases in human cancers, Pharmacol Res, 142, 151, 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.01.039 · DOI
- Busca, 2016, ERK1 and ERK2 map kinases: specific roles or functional redundancy?, Front Cell Dev Biol, 4, 53, 10.3389/fcell.2016.00053 · DOI
- Cohen-Armon, 2007, DNA-independent PARP-1 activation by phosphorylated ERK2 increases Elk1 activity: a link to histone acetylation, Mol Cell, 25, 297, 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
- Kang, 2017, ERK1 Directly Interacts With JNK1 Leading to Regulation of JNK1/c-Jun Activity and Cell Transformation, J Cell Biochem, 118, 2357, 10.1002/jcb.25896 · DOI
- Roskoski, 2012, ERK1/2 MAP kinases: structure, function, and regulation, Pharmacol Res, 66, 105, 10.1016/j.phrs.2012.04.005 · DOI
- Miller, 2017, A high throughput assay to identify substrate-selective inhibitors of the ERK protein kinases, Biochem Pharmacol, 142, 39, 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.06.127 · DOI
- Sammons, 2019, Targeting ERK beyond the boundaries of the kinase active site in melanoma, Mol Carcinog, 58, 1551, 10.1002/mc.23047 · DOI
- Barretina, 2012, The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity, Nature, 483, 603, 10.1038/nature11003 · DOI · Paper page
- Leung, 2019, Hyperactivation of MAPK signaling is deleterious to RAS/RAF-mutant melanoma, Mol Cancer Res, 17, 199, 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0327 · DOI
- Smurnyy, 2014, DNA sequencing and CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing for target validation in mammalian cells, Nat Chem Biol, 10, 623, 10.1038/nchembio.1550 · DOI
- Dai, 2005, Evolving gene/transcript definitions significantly alter the interpretation of GeneChip data, Nucleic Acids Res, 33, e175, 10.1093/nar/gni179 · DOI
- Sato, 2020, Phenotypic screening using large-scale genomic libraries to identify drug targets for the treatment of cancer, Oncol Lett, 19, 3617
- McDonald, 2017, Project DRIVE: a compendium of cancer dependencies and synthetic lethal relationships uncovered by large-scale, deep RNAi screening, Cell, 170, 577, 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
- McFarland, 2018, Improved estimation of cancer dependencies from large-scale RNAi screens using model-based normalization and data integration, Nat Commun, 9, 4610, 10.1038/s41467-018-06916-5 · DOI
- Tsherniak, 2017, Defining a cancer dependency map, Cell, 170, 564, 10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
- Dempster, 2019, Agreement between two large pan-cancer CRISPR-Cas9 gene dependency data sets, Nat Commun, 10, 5817, 10.1038/s41467-019-13805-y · DOI
- Meyers, 2017, Computational correction of copy number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells, Nat Genet, 49, 1779, 10.1038/ng.3984 · DOI · Paper page
- Reed, 1995, Loss of expression of the p16/cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2 tumor suppressor gene in melanocytic lesions correlates with invasive stage of tumor progression, Cancer Res, 55, 2713
- Tate, 2019, COSMIC: the catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer, Nucleic Acids Res, 47, D941, 10.1093/nar/gky1015 · DOI · Paper page
- Hatano, 2003, Essential role for ERK2 mitogen-activated protein kinase in placental development, Genes Cells, 8, 847, 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2003.00680.x · DOI · Paper page
- Selcher, 2001, Mice lacking the ERK1 isoform of MAP kinase are unimpaired in emotional learning, Learn Mem, 8, 11, 10.1101/lm.37001 · DOI
- Fremin, 2015, Functional redundancy of ERK1 and ERK2 MAP kinases during development, Cell Rep, 12, 913, 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.011 · DOI
- Nusinow, 2020, Quantitative proteomics of the cancer cell line encyclopedia, Cell, 180, 387, 10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.023 · DOI · Paper page
- Ghandi, 2019, Next-generation characterization of the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, Nature, 569, 503, 10.1038/s41586-019-1186-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Banaszynski, 2006, A rapid, reversible, and tunable method to regulate protein function in living cells using synthetic small molecules, Cell, 126, 995, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.025 · DOI · Paper page
- Robinson, 1996, Mutation of position 52 in ERK2 creates a nonproductive binding mode for adenosine 5′-triphosphate, Biochemistry, 35, 5641, 10.1021/bi952723e · DOI
- Dimitri, 2005, Spatially separate docking sites on ERK2 regulate distinct signaling events in vivo, Curr Biol, 15, 1319, 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.037 · DOI · Paper page
- Shin, 2010, ERK2 but not ERK1 induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transformation via DEF motif-dependent signaling events, Mol Cell, 38, 114, 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.020 · DOI
- Gagliardi, 2020, Differential functions of ERK1 and ERK2 in lung metastasis processes in triple-negative breast cancer, Sci Rep, 10, 8537, 10.1038/s41598-020-65250-3 · DOI
- Gusenbauer, 2015, Erk2 but not Erk1 regulates crosstalk between Met and EGFR in squamous cell carcinoma cell lines, Mol Cancer, 14, 54, 10.1186/s12943-015-0319-z · DOI
- Kaufmann, 2001, The extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases Erk1/Erk2 stimulate expression and biological activity of the transcriptional regulator Egr-1, Biol Chem, 382, 1077, 10.1515/BC.2001.135 · DOI
- Inoue, 2004, Transcriptional induction of FosB/DeltaFosB gene by mechanical stress in osteoblasts, J Biol Chem, 279, 49795, 10.1074/jbc.M404096200 · DOI
- Ahn, 2017, The slow cycling phenotype: a growing problem for treatment resistance in melanoma, Mol Cancer Ther, 16, 1002, 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0535 · DOI
- Sharma, 2005, Mutant V599EB-Raf regulates growth and vascular development of malignant melanoma tumors, Cancer Res, 65, 2412, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2423 · DOI
- Ricard, 2019, Isoform-specific roles of ERK1 and ERK2 in arteriogenesis, Cells, 9, 38, 10.3390/cells9010038 · DOI
- Marchi, 2008, The N-terminal domain of ERK1 accounts for the functional differences with ERK2, PLoS One, 3, e3873, 10.1371/journal.pone.0003873 · DOI
- Lefloch, 2009, Total ERK1/2 activity regulates cell proliferation, Cell Cycle, 8, 705, 10.4161/cc.8.5.7734 · DOI
- Unal, 2017, A compendium of ERK targets, FEBS Lett, 591, 2607, 10.1002/1873-3468.12740 · DOI
- Fantz, 2001, Docking sites on substrate proteins direct extracellular signal-regulated kinase to phosphorylate specific residues, J Biol Chem, 276, 27256, 10.1074/jbc.M102512200 · DOI
- Lee, 2011, Examining docking interactions on ERK2 with modular peptide substrates, Biochemistry, 50, 9500, 10.1021/bi201103b · DOI
- Boston, 2011, Characterization of ERK docking domain inhibitors that induce apoptosis by targeting Rsk-1 and caspase-9, BMC Cancer, 11, 7, 10.1186/1471-2407-11-7 · DOI
- Hancock, 2005, Identification of novel extracellular signal-regulated kinase docking domain inhibitors, J Med Chem, 48, 4586, 10.1021/jm0501174 · DOI
- Sammons, 2019, A novel class of common docking domain inhibitors that prevent ERK2 activation and substrate phosphorylation, ACS Chem Biol, 14, 1183, 10.1021/acschembio.9b00093 · DOI
- Qin, 2012, Specifically targeting ERK1 or ERK2 kills melanoma cells, J Transl Med, 10, 15, 10.1186/1479-5876-10-15 · DOI
- Lake, 2016, Negative feedback regulation of the ERK1/2 MAPK pathway, Cell Mol Life Sci, 73, 4397, 10.1007/s00018-016-2297-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Frémin, 2007, ERK2 but not ERK1 plays a key role in hepatocyte replication: an RNAi-mediated ERK2 knockdown approach in wild-type and ERK1 null hepatocytes, Hepatology, 45, 1035, 10.1002/hep.21551 · DOI · Paper page
- Shin, 2018, Isoform-selective activity-based profiling of ERK signaling, Chem Sci, 9, 2419, 10.1039/C8SC00043C · DOI
- Plotnikov, 2015, The nuclear translocation of ERK1/2 as an anticancer target, Nat Commun, 6, 6685, 10.1038/ncomms7685 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Crowe, M. S., Zavorotinskaya, T., Voliva, C. F., Shirley, M. D., Wang, Y., Ruddy, D. A., Rakiec, D. P., Engelman, J. A., Stuart, D. D., & Freeman, A. K.
- Affiliations
- 1Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
- 2Oncology, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Emeryville, California.
- Corresponding author
- Freeman, Alyson K.
- Venue
- Molecular Cancer Research
- Published
- 2021-03-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1063-1075
- ISSN
- 1541-7786 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3125
- OpenAlex
- W3135174747
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Molecular Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
- Keywords
- BRAF-mutant melanoma, ERK2, ERK1, MAPK signaling, melanoma cell proliferation, melanocyte transformation, gene expression profiling, MAPK pathway inhibitors
- MeSH terms
- RNA-Seq, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Melanoma, Mutation, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1, MAP Kinase Signaling System, RNA Interference, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Cell Proliferation, HEK293 Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review