Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 999

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Characterization of Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer and Identification of New Drug Targets

Open access
Beltran, Himisha, Rickman, David S., Park, Kyung, Chae, Sung Suk, Sboner, Andrea, MacDonald, Theresa Y., Wang, Yuwei, Sheikh, Karen L., Terry, Stéphane, Tagawa, Scott T., Dhir, Rajiv, Nelson, Joel B., de la Taille, Alexandre, Allory, Yves, Gerstein, Mark B., Perner, Sven, Pienta, Kenneth J., Chinnaiyan, Arul M., Wang, Yuzhuo, Collins, Colin C., Gleave, Martin E., Demichelis, Francesca, Nanus, David M., Rubin, Mark A.·2011·Cancer Discovery

Abstract

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is an aggressive subtype of prostate cancer that most commonly evolves from preexisting prostate adenocarcinoma (PCA). Using next-generation RNA sequencing and oligonucleotide arrays, we profiled 7 NEPC, 30 PCA, and 5 benign prostate tissue (BEN) samples and validated findings in tumors from a large cohort of patients (37 with NEPC, 169 with PCA, and 22 with BEN) using immunohistochemistry and FISH. We discovered significant overexpression and gene amplification of AURKA and MYCN in 40% of NEPC and 5% of PCA tumors, respectively, and evidence that they cooperate to induce a neuroendocrine phenotype in prostate cells. There was dramatic and enhanced sensitivity of NEPC (and MYCN overexpressing PCA) to Aurora kinase inhibitor therapy both in vitro and in vivo, with complete suppression of neuroendocrine marker expression following treatment. We propose that alterations in Aurora kinase A and N-myc are involved in the development of NEPC and that future clinical trials will help determine the efficacy of Aurora kinase inhibitor therapy. Significance: We report on the largest in-depth molecular analysis of NEPC and provide new insight into molecular events involved in the progression of prostate cancer. Cancer Discovery; 1(6); 487–95. ©2011 AACR. Read the Commentary on this article by Aparicio et al., p. 466 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 457

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-11-0130

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 999

Metadata

Authors
Beltran, H., Rickman, D. S., Park, K., Chae, S. S., Sboner, A., MacDonald, T. Y., Wang, Y., Sheikh, K. L., Terry, S., Tagawa, S. T., Dhir, R., Nelson, J. B., de la Taille, A., Allory, Y., Gerstein, M. B., Perner, S., Pienta, K. J., Chinnaiyan, A. M., Wang, Y., Collins, C. C., Gleave, M. E., Demichelis, F., Nanus, D. M., & Rubin, M. A.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2011-11-01
Volume
1
Issue
6
Pages
487-495
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2130955565
Cited by
999
References
4
FWCI
28.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Characterization of Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer and Identification of New Drug Targets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-11-0130
The paper
Beltran, H., Rickman, D. S., Park, K., Chae, S. S., Sboner, A., MacDonald, T. Y., Wang, Y., Sheikh, K. L., Terry, S., Tagawa, S. T., Dhir, R., Nelson, J. B., de la Taille, A., Allory, Y., Gerstein, M. B., Perner, S., Pienta, K. J., Chinnaiyan, A. M., Wang, Y., . . . Rubin, M. A. (2011). Molecular Characterization of Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer and Identification of New Drug Targets. Cancer Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-11-0130

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.