Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Androgen Receptor Signaling in Circulating Tumor Cells as a Marker of Hormonally Responsive Prostate Cancer

Open access
Miyamoto, David T., Lee, Richard J., Stott, Shannon L., Ting, David T., Wittner, Ben S., Ulman, Matthew, Smas, Malgorzata E., Lord, Jenna B., Brannigan, Brian W., Trautwein, Julie, Bander, Neil H., Wu, Chin-Lee, Sequist, Lecia V., Smith, Matthew R., Ramaswamy, Sridhar, Toner, Mehmet, Maheswaran, Shyamala, Haber, Daniel A.·2012·Cancer Discovery

Abstract

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is initially effective in treating metastatic prostate cancer, and secondary hormonal therapies are being tested to suppress androgen receptor (AR) reactivation in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Despite variable responses to AR pathway inhibitors in CRPC, there are no reliable biomarkers to guide their application. Here, we used microfluidic capture of circulating tumor cells (CTC) to measure AR signaling readouts before and after therapeutic interventions. Single-cell immunofluorescence analysis revealed predominantly “AR-on” CTC signatures in untreated patients, compared with heterogeneous (“AR-on, AR-off, and AR-mixed”) CTC populations in patients with CRPC. Initiation of first-line ADT induced a profound switch from “AR-on” to “AR-off” CTCs, whereas secondary hormonal therapy in CRPC resulted in variable responses. Presence of “AR-mixed” CTCs and increasing “AR-on” cells despite treatment with abiraterone acetate were associated with an adverse treatment outcome. Measuring treatment-induced signaling responses within CTCs may help guide therapy in prostate cancer. Significance: Acquired resistance to first-line hormonal therapy in prostate cancer is heterogeneous in the extent of AR pathway reactivation. Measurement of pre- and posttreatment AR signaling within CTCs may help target such treatments to patients most likely to respond to second-line therapies. Cancer Discov; 2(11); 995–1003. ©2012 AACR. Read the Commentary on this article by Pantel and Alix-Panabières, p. 974. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 961

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0222

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Miyamoto, D. T., Lee, R. J., Stott, S. L., Ting, D. T., Wittner, B. S., Ulman, M., Smas, M. E., Lord, J. B., Brannigan, B. W., Trautwein, J., Bander, N. H., Wu, C.-L., Sequist, L. V., Smith, M. R., Ramaswamy, S., Toner, M., Maheswaran, S., & Haber, D. A.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2012-11-01
Volume
2
Issue
11
Pages
995-1003
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2110735634
Cited by
272
References
5
FWCI
22.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Androgen Receptor Signaling in Circulating Tumor Cells as a Marker of Hormonally Responsive Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0222
The paper
Miyamoto, D. T., Lee, R. J., Stott, S. L., Ting, D. T., Wittner, B. S., Ulman, M., Smas, M. E., Lord, J. B., Brannigan, B. W., Trautwein, J., Bander, N. H., Wu, C.-L., Sequist, L. V., Smith, M. R., Ramaswamy, S., Toner, M., Maheswaran, S., & Haber, D. A. (2012). Androgen Receptor Signaling in Circulating Tumor Cells as a Marker of Hormonally Responsive Prostate Cancer. Cancer Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0222

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.