Cited by 84Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchCancer Cells and MetastasisCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

A Classical Epithelial State Drives Acute Resistance to KRAS Inhibition in Pancreatic Cancer

Open access
Singhal, Anupriya, Styers, Hannah C., Rub, Jonathan, Li, Zhuxuan, Torborg, Stefan R., Kim, Jung Yun, Grbovic-Huezo, Olivera, Feng, Huijin +11 more·2024·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Intratumoral heterogeneity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by a balance between basal and classical epithelial cancer cell states, with basal dominance associating with chemoresistance and a dismal prognosis. Targeting oncogenic KRAS, the primary driver of pancreatic cancer, shows early promise in clinical trials, but efficacy is limited by acquired resistance. Using genetically engineered mouse models and patient-derived xenografts, we find that basal PDAC cells are highly sensitive to KRAS inhibitors. Employing fluorescent and bioluminescent reporter systems, we longitudinally track cell-state dynamics in vivo and reveal a rapid, KRAS inhibitor–induced enrichment of the classical state. Lineage tracing uncovers that these enriched classical PDAC cells are a reservoir for disease relapse. Genetic or chemotherapy-mediated ablation of the classical cell state is synergistic with KRAS inhibition, providing a preclinical proof of concept for this therapeutic strategy. Our findings motivate combining classical state–directed therapies with KRAS inhibitors to deepen responses and counteract resistance in pancreatic cancer. Significance: KRAS inhibitors hold promise in pancreatic cancer, but responses are limited by acquired resistance. We find that a classical epithelial cancer cell state is acutely resistant to KRAS inhibition and serves as a reservoir for disease relapse. Targeting the classical state alongside KRAS inhibition deepens responses, revealing a potent therapeutic strategy. See related commentary by Marasco and Misale, p. 2018

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-24-0740

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lineage plasticity is a critical mechanism of non-genetic resistance to KRAS-targeted therapies in NSCLC and PDAC.

    “Lineage plasticity has emerged as a critical mechanism of non-genetic resistance to KRAS-targeted therapies in NSCLC and PDAC.27–31”

    From Paneth-like transition drives resistance to dual targeting of KRAS and EGFR in colorectal cancer (2026) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results (‘Classical PDAC cells give rise to disease relapse’; page unavailable) show that classical PDAC cells survive KRAS inhibition, give rise to other cell states, and contribute to relapse. The Discussion says this phenotypic shift mediates resistance in PDAC. It mentions a shift toward alveolar identity in lung adenocarcinoma but does not establish lineage plasticity as a resistance mechanism in NSCLC, so it supports the PDAC portion of the sentence, not the whole claim. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lineage plasticity has an established role in resistance to KRAS-targeted therapies.

    “Despite the established role of lineage plasticity in resistance to KRAS-targeted therapies,26–31 effective therapeutic interventions targeting drivers of lineage plasticity remain lacking.”
  • Transition into a classical state is observed in PDAC cells surviving KRAS-targeted therapy.

    “Differentiation into alveolar type 1 (AT1)-like,26 squamous,27,28 as well as mucinous states29 has been implicated to contribute to KRAS inhibitor tolerance in lung adenocarcinoma, whereas transition into a classical state is observed in PDAC cells surviving KRAS-targeted therapy.30,31”
  • Pancreatic cancer cells adopt a classical epithelial state to bypass KRAS inhibition.

    “In NSCLC, KRAS-mutant tumors evade therapy through transition into AT1-like,29 squamous,27,28 or mucinous states,29 while pancreatic cancer cells adopt a classical epithelial state to bypass KRAS inhibition.30,31”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singhal, A., Styers, H. C., Rub, J., Li, Z., Torborg, S. R., Kim, J. Y., Grbovic-Huezo, O., Feng, H., Tarcan, Z. C., Sahin Ozkan, H., Hallin, J., Basturk, O., Yaeger, R., Christensen, J. G., Betel, D., Yan, Y., Chio, I. I. C., de Stanchina, E., & Tammela, T.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • 2David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Mirati Therapeutics (United States) (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • 1Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Corresponding author
Tammela, Tuomas
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2024-07-05
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
2122-2134
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W4400416899
Cited by
84
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 7
FWCI
14.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • Break Through Cancer
  • National Cancer Institute (R37-CA244911, K12 CA184746, P50 CA257881-01A1, P30 CA08748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, KRAS inhibitors, acquired drug resistance, intratumoral heterogeneity, recurrence, lineage tracing, combination therapy, KRAS inhibition
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review