Cited by 74Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsCancer Cells and MetastasisProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

Alveolar Differentiation Drives Resistance to KRAS Inhibition in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Open access
Li, Zhuxuan, Zhuang, Xueqian, Pan, Chun-Hao, Yan, Yan, Thummalapalli, Rohit, Hallin, Jill, Torborg, Stefan, Singhal, Anupriya +9 more·2024·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), commonly driven by KRAS mutations, is responsible for 7% of all cancer mortality. The first allele-specific KRAS inhibitors were recently approved in LUAD, but the clinical benefit is limited by intrinsic and acquired resistance. LUAD predominantly arises from alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells, which function as facultative alveolar stem cells by self-renewing and replacing alveolar type 1 (AT1) cells. Using genetically engineered mouse models, patient-derived xenografts, and patient samples, we found inhibition of KRAS promotes transition to a quiescent AT1-like cancer cell state in LUAD tumors. Similarly, suppressing Kras induced AT1 differentiation of wild-type AT2 cells upon lung injury. The AT1-like LUAD cells exhibited high growth and differentiation potential upon treatment cessation, whereas ablation of the AT1-like cells robustly improved treatment response to KRAS inhibitors. Our results uncover an unexpected role for KRAS in promoting intratumoral heterogeneity and suggest that targeting alveolar differentiation may augment KRAS-targeted therapies in LUAD. Significance: Treatment resistance limits response to KRAS inhibitors in LUAD patients. We find LUAD residual disease following KRAS targeting is composed of AT1-like cancer cells with the capacity to reignite tumorigenesis. Targeting the AT1-like cells augments responses to KRAS inhibition, elucidating a therapeutic strategy to overcome resistance to KRAS-targeted therapy. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 201

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-0289

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lineage plasticity has an established role in resistance to KRAS-targeted therapies.

    “Despite the established role of lineage plasticity in resistance to KRAS-targeted therapies,26–31 effective therapeutic interventions targeting drivers of lineage plasticity remain lacking.”
  • Differentiation into AT1-like, squamous, and mucinous states has been implicated in KRAS inhibitor tolerance in lung adenocarcinoma.

    “Differentiation into alveolar type 1 (AT1)-like,26 squamous,27,28 as well as mucinous states29 has been implicated to contribute to KRAS inhibitor tolerance in lung adenocarcinoma, whereas transition into a classical state is observed in PDAC cells surviving KRAS-targeted therapy.30,31”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Z., Zhuang, X., Pan, C.-H., Yan, Y., Thummalapalli, R., Hallin, J., Torborg, S., Singhal, A., Chang, J. C., Manchado, E., Dow, L. E., Yaeger, R., Christensen, J. G., Lowe, S. W., Rudin, C. M., Joost, S., & Tammela, T.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Mirati Therapeutics (United States) (US)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Tammela, Tuomas
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2023-11-06
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
308-325
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W4388406385
Cited by
74
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2
FWCI
13.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Cancer Society
  • National Institutes of Health (R01-CA270116)
  • Josie Robertson Scholarship
  • NIH/NCI cancer center support grant (P30-CA08748)
  • New York Stem Cell Foundation (C32559GG)
  • Hope Funds for Cancer Research
  • National Cancer Institute (F30-CA254120)
  • Medical Scientist Training Program from the NIH (T32GM007739)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
lung adenocarcinoma, KRAS inhibition, drug resistance, alveolar differentiation, alveolar type I cells, alveolar type II cells, intratumoral heterogeneity, alveolar stem cells, KRAS mutation, lung injury, KRAS-targeted therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review